Recensione del mini-PC Geekom GT13 Pro - Elegante alternativa al NUC con Intel Core i9-13900H, 32 GB di RAM DDR4 e 2 TB SSD

Name: Geekom GT13 Pro
Brand: Geekom

Mini-PC minimalista!

Il GT13 Pro di Geekom segue la gamma di modelli esistenti con un design elegante. L'Intel Core i9-13900H promette molto, ma in questa recensione dettagliata, diamo un'occhiata più da vicino alle prestazioni del SoC di fascia alta nel piccolo case da 0,5 litri. Con 32 GB di RAM e un SSD da 2 TB, il mini PC è ben equipaggiato, il che si riflette anche nelle connessioni con due porte USB4.

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (traduzione a cura di DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/23/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Mini PC Desktop Intel Raptor Lake Thunderbolt

Con Geekom GT13 Pro, il produttore ha nel suo portafoglio un mini-PC molto potente basato sui processori Intel. Purtroppo, Geekom utilizza solo i processori Raptor Lake H, anche se Intel ha recentemente lanciato i più recenti chip Meteor Lake. Nella configurazione migliore, il processore Intel Core i9-13900H abbinato a 32 GB di RAM e a un SSD da 2 TB. In termini di prezzo, deve scavare a fondo nelle sue tasche, poiché il conto finale arriva a 930 euro. A soli 721 euro, il Geekom GT13 Pro, basato sul processore Intel Core i7-13620H è significativamente più economico. Con 32 GB di RAM, il modello più economico ha la stessa quantità di memoria di lavoro, anche se la memoria di massa è solo la metà, con 1 TB.

Diamo un'occhiata più da vicino a quanto il Geekom GT13 Pro sia all'altezza di altri mini-PC ad alte prestazioni. A causa del prezzo, tuttavia, le aspettative sono già molto alte. Nella tabella seguente abbiamo raccolto una panoramica dei dispositivi di confronto che accompagnano Geekom in questa recensione.

Dispositivo di test fornito da Geekom

Scarica la tua immagine come PNG / SVG

Geekom GT13 Pro

Processore

Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 35 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H

Scheda grafica

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Core: 1500 MHz, 31.0.101.5522 DCH

Memoria

32 GB

, DDR4-3200, 2 von 2 belegt, max. 64 GB

Scheda madre

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Harddisk

Acer N7000, 2048 GB

, 1800 GB libera

Scheda audio

Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH - cAVS

Porte di connessione

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen 2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Porta Docking, Connessioni Audio: 3.5mm Klinke, Lettore schede: SD-Card (Full-Size)

Rete

Intel Ethernet Controller I225-V (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Dimensioni

altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 37 x 112.4 x 112.4

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Altre caratteristiche

120-Watt-Power-Adapter, 36 Mesi Garanzia

Peso

440 gr, Alimentazione: 249 gr

Prezzo

930 EUR

Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

guarda tutte le specifiche

Potenziali concorrenti a confrontos

Data	Version	Modello	Memoria	Peso	Altezza	Price
06/2024	v8	Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	32768 MB	440 gr	37 mm	930 EUR
06/2024	v8	Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	32768 MB	653 gr	60 mm	649 US-Dollar
05/2024	v7 ^(old)	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	32768 MB	863 gr	48.6 mm	959 Euro
05/2024	v7 ^(old)	Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	32768 MB	432 gr	38 mm	949 EUR
04/2024	v8	Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	32768 MB	545 gr	37 mm	899 EUR
04/2024	v7 ^(old)	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	32768 MB	768 gr	57 mm	1199 EUR
12/2023	v7 ^(old)	Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	32768 MB	750 gr	52.3 mm	879 EUR
08/2023	v7 ^(old)	Khadas Mind i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	32768 MB	438 gr	20 mm	799 Euro

Nota: abbiamo aggiornato il nostro sistema di valutazione e i risultati della versione 8 non sono paragonabili a quelli della versione 7, disponibili qui qui.

Geekom GT13 Pro e l'alimentatore (19 V; 6,32 A)

Custodia - alloggiamento da 0,5L in alluminio con un colore differente

Chi ha già letto le nostre prove del Geekom A7 o del Geekom A8noterà molte somiglianze quando guarderà il Geekom GT13 Pro. E sì, i dispositivi sono simili all'esterno. Il Geekom GT13 Pro si distingue visivamente solo per la diversa combinazione di colori. A differenza dei due dispositivi argentati, il case della variante Intel copiata è grigio scuro. Geekom stessa chiama questo colore grigio basalto. Soggettivamente, il design ci piace un po' di più. In definitiva, il Geekom GT13 Pro condivide gli stessi vantaggi e svantaggi. L'eccellente lavorazione e la scelta dei materiali sono certamente argomenti a favore del dispositivo Geekom. Il mini-PC ha anche un design estremamente compatto, che non è necessariamente un vantaggio in termini di unità di raffreddamento integrata. Il nostro campione di prova pesa solo 440 grammi ed è uno dei dispositivi più leggeri qui. L'alimentatore pesa altri 249 grammi.

Confronto delle dimensioni

Attrezzatura - Buona selezione, tra cui 2x USB4

Abbiamo già visto molte volte che Geekom offre molte opzioni di connettività nonostante il suo design estremamente compatto. Il Geekom GT13 Pro non fa eccezione e offre molte opzioni di connettività esterna. Quattro porte USB-A sono sufficienti, soprattutto perché ci sono due interfacce più moderne con USB4, che possono essere utilizzate per ampliare enormemente la gamma di applicazioni del mini-PC. Daremo anche un'occhiata alle prestazioni con una scheda grafica esterna. Il Geekom GT13 Pro può gestire fino a quattro display 4K contemporaneamente. È anche possibile controllare un display 8K. Il veloce lettore di schede SD, che si trova sul lato sinistro, non va dimenticato e va evidenziato positivamente.

Le connessioni esterne di Geekom GT13 Pro (Fonte: Geekom)

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	181.79 MB/s +5%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	176.8 MB/s +2%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	174.57 MB/s +1%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	172.63 MB/s
Geekom Mini IT13 Intel Core i9-13900H	154.449 MB/s -11%
Geekom Mini IT12 Intel Core i7-1260P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	129.2 MB/s -25%
Media della classe Mini PC (15.1 - 214, n=26, ultimi 2 anni)	97.7 MB/s -43%
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	65 MB/s -62%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	200.48 MB/s +12%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	182.85 MB/s +2%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	182.5 MB/s +2%
Geekom Mini IT13 Intel Core i9-13900H	180.4 MB/s 0%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	179.64 MB/s
Geekom Mini IT12 Intel Core i7-1260P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	176.8 MB/s -2%
Media della classe Mini PC (18.2 - 221, n=26, ultimi 2 anni)	112.4 MB/s -37%
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	69.9 MB/s -61%

Comunicazione

Nel Geekom GT13 Pro troviamo lo stesso modulo radio, che viene utilizzato anche nel Geekom A8 Geekom A8. Il modulo WLAN MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 permette di lavorare con le bande di frequenza di 2,4 GHz e di 5 GHz e 6 GHz. Le nostre misurazioni sono limitate alle bande di frequenza 5 e 6 GHz. Abbiamo documentato solo lievi differenze nelle prestazioni in combinazione con il nostro router di prova Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000. Purtroppo, Geekom non include un modulo Wi-Fi moderno. Sia il modulo Acemagic F2A sia il modulo Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti possono offrire risultati leggermente migliori con l'Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200. Il Geekom GT13 Pro dispone anche di una presa RJ45. Qui è possibile raggiungere velocità di trasferimento dati fino a 2,5 GBit/s.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1770 (1584^min - 1790^max) MBit/s +12%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1761 (1734^min - 1774^max) MBit/s +11%
Geekom GT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1583 (1557^min - 1611^max) MBit/s
Geekom A8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1458 (1382^min - 1500^max) MBit/s -8%
Khadas Mind Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1445 (1342^min - 1468^max) MBit/s -9%
Media MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (684 - 1771, n=39)	1433 MBit/s -9%
Media della classe Mini PC (684 - 1771, n=55, ultimi 2 anni)	1380 MBit/s -13%
Geekom XT12 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1152 (576^min - 1273^max) MBit/s -27%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1615 (767^min - 1670^max) MBit/s +13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1562 (1198^min - 1713^max) MBit/s +9%
Geekom GT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1429 (1392^min - 1511^max) MBit/s
Media MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (394 - 1800, n=38)	1399 MBit/s -2%
Geekom A8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1356 (669^min - 1390^max) MBit/s -5%
Khadas Mind Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1348 (1293^min - 1402^max) MBit/s -6%
Media della classe Mini PC (394 - 1800, n=55, ultimi 2 anni)	1330 MBit/s -7%
Geekom XT12 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1315 (691^min - 1352^max) MBit/s -8%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1599 (802^min - 1683^max) MBit/s +14%
Geekom GT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1398 (1261^min - 1453^max) MBit/s
Media MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (707 - 1775, n=55)	1397 MBit/s 0%
Geekom A8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1101 (606^min - 1257^max) MBit/s -21%
Khadas Mind Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1059 (937^min - 1173^max) MBit/s -24%
Media della classe Mini PC (320 - 1796, n=113, ultimi 2 anni)	945 MBit/s -32%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)	934 (915^min - 943^max) MBit/s -33%
Geekom XT12 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	892 (460^min - 921^max) MBit/s -36%
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	838 (728^min - 926^max) MBit/s -40%
Aoostar GEM12 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	740 (676^min - 758^max) MBit/s -47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1566 (904^min - 1695^max) MBit/s +37%
Media MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (358 - 1785, n=55)	1279 MBit/s +12%
Geekom GT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1146 (846^min - 1308^max) MBit/s
Khadas Mind Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1108 (703^min - 1199^max) MBit/s -3%
Geekom A8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1105 (489^min - 1222^max) MBit/s -4%
Media della classe Mini PC (184.1 - 1776, n=113, ultimi 2 anni)	874 MBit/s -24%
Aoostar GEM12 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	736 (369^min - 756^max) MBit/s -36%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)	729 (668^min - 784^max) MBit/s -36%
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	709 (369^min - 977^max) MBit/s -38%
Geekom XT12 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	589 (295^min - 624^max) MBit/s -49%

Geekom GT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1429 (1373-1511)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1562 (1198-1713)

Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1590 (767-1670)

Geekom GT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1582 (1557-1611)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1760 (1734-1774)

Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1769 (1584-1790)

Geekom GT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1397 (1261-1453)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1572 (802-1683)

Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø838 (728-926)

Geekom GT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1146 (846-1308)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1566 (904-1695)

Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø695 (369-977)

Accessori

Geekom GT13 Pro è dotato di un alimentatore da 120 watt. Nella confezione sono presenti anche un cavo HDMI e una piastra di montaggio VESA. Il produttore include anche un piccolo manuale d'uso, che descrive le opzioni di connessione e l'installazione di RAM e SSD, tra le altre cose. Geekom consegna il prodotto in una piccola scatola di cartone. La quantità di plastica potrebbe comunque essere ridotta al minimo, in quanto il cavo HDMI e la piastra di montaggio VESA sono imballati separatamente.

Manutenzione

Il Geekom GT13 Pro viene sempre venduto insieme a RAM e SSD. Ciò significa che il dispositivo non deve necessariamente essere aperto per installare i componenti hardware mancanti, come nel caso delle varianti barebone. Se ha comunque bisogno di accedere all'interno, può aprire il Geekom GT13 Pro dal lato inferiore. Quattro viti sono nascoste sotto i piedini di gomma incollati, che fissano il coperchio di plastica. Occorre prestare attenzione per evitare di danneggiare il cavo dell'antenna WLAN. C'è un'altra piastra metallica sotto il coperchio di plastica, che deve essere rimossa se si vuole accedere all'SSD o alla RAM. Anche il modulo WLAN può essere sostituito. Per accedere all'unità di raffreddamento, che il produttore pubblicizza come IceBlast 1.5, è necessario rimuovere completamente la scheda dall'alloggiamento, il che non rappresenta una grande sfida nella pratica.

Geekom GT13 Pro con lato inferiore aperto

Circuito stampato con unità di raffreddamento di Geekom GT13 Pro

Prestazioni - Processore Intel Raptor Lake con un massimo di 14 core

Il Geekom GT13 Pro è disponibile in due versioni. Il modello superiore con Intel Core i9-13900H dotato di 14 core, garantisce buone prestazioni multi-thread. Se vuole risparmiare un po' sul portafoglio, può anche acquistare l'elegante mini-PC con un processore Intel Core i7-13620H. Con 10 core e 16 thread, questo processore dovrebbe essere all'altezza dell'uso quotidiano. 32 GB di RAM DDR4 sono sempre inclusi e, pertanto, costituiscono una solida base per affrontare i compiti più impegnativi per la memoria.

Condizioni del test

Per tutti i test sulle prestazioni con il Geekom GT13 Pro, abbiamo utilizzato il piano energetico "prestazioni massime". Ci sono state solo deviazioni da questo nelle misurazioni del consumo energetico e del rumore secondo i nostri Criteri di test. I limiti di potenza del produttore per l'Intel Core i9-13900H sono definiti come 64 watt (PL2) e 35 watt (PL1).

Processore

Il modello top di gamma Geekom GT13 Pro è dotato di un Intel Core i9-13900H. Nella valutazione delle prestazioni, tuttavia, possiamo notare che il nostro campione di prova si posiziona solo a metà classifica. A causa della bassa capacità di raffreddamento, che va di pari passo con il design estremamente compatto, il SoC può funzionare con un TDP minimo di soli 35 watt sotto carico continuo. Questo ha gli effetti più gravi nei benchmark multi-thread, in cui l'Intel Core i9-13900H a volte offre prestazioni inferiori del 20-30 percento rispetto a quanto abbiamo documentato in media per questo processore fino ad oggi.

Per ulteriori confronti e benchmark, la invitiamo a consultare la nostra Tabella di confronto delle CPU.

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	58.2 pt
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	57.6 pt
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	57 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	56.9 pt
Media Intel Core i9-13900H	56.3 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	55.6 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	54.1 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	52.1 pt
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	51.7 pt

Cinebench 2024
CPU Multi Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1067 Points +52%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1022 Points +45%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	967 Points +38%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	956 Points +36%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	933 Points +33%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (680 - 818, n=3)	734 Points +4%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	703 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	578 Points -18%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	560 Points -20%
CPU Single Core
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	113 Points +9%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	110 Points +6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	108 Points +4%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	108 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	107 Points +3%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	106 Points +2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	106 Points +2%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	104 Points
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (101 - 104, n=3)	102.7 Points -1%

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	18497 Points +42%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	18016 Points +38%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (11997 - 20385, n=28)	16813 Points +29%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	16795 Points +29%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	16706 Points +28%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	16130 Points +24%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	13015 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	11036 Points -15%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	9859 Points -24%
Single Core
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (1297 - 2054, n=26)	1887 Points +10%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	1877 Points +9%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1851 Points +8%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1825 Points +6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1824 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1783 Points +4%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1779 Points +4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1771 Points +3%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1715 Points

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	287 Points +17%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	279 Points +14%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	279 Points +14%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	270 Points +10%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (211 - 297, n=26)	269 Points +10%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	268 Points +9%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	258 Points +5%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	251 Points +2%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	245 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2746 Points +22%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2738 Points +21%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (2061 - 3100, n=26)	2676 Points +18%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2640 Points +17%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2608 Points +15%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2537 Points +12%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	2260 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	2121 Points -6%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	1642 Points -27%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	724 Points +10%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (428 - 792, n=25)	720 Points +9%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	715 Points +8%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	711 Points +8%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	701 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	691 Points +5%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	690 Points +5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	679 Points +3%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	659 Points
CPU (Multi Core)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7196 Points +44%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7188 Points +43%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6591 Points +31%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (4935 - 7716, n=25)	6533 Points +30%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6509 Points +30%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6346 Points +27%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	5013 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	4294 Points -14%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	3820 Points -24%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	3.45 Points +16%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	3.33 Points +12%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	3.32 Points +11%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	3.27 Points +10%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3.27 Points +10%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3.13 Points +5%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	2.99 Points 0%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	2.98 Points
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (2.93 - 3, n=3)	2.97 Points 0%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	33.95 Points +24%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	33.49 Points +22%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	31.31 Points +14%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	30.25 Points +10%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	29.76 Points +8%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (27.5 - 29.7, n=3)	28.5 Points +4%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	27.48 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	21.11 Points -23%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	19.54 Points -29%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	15227 Points +10%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	14561 Points +5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	14374 Points +4%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	14177 Points +3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	14163 Points +2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13938 Points +1%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	13820 Points
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (13515 - 13820, n=3)	13696 Points -1%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	13378 Points -3%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	95005 Points +20%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	90144 Points +14%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	88902 Points +13%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	87064 Points +10%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	85872 Points +9%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	79014 Points
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (76558 - 79856, n=3)	78476 Points -1%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	69621 Points -12%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	61639 Points -22%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	324 Seconds * -24%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	296 Seconds * -13%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	262 Seconds *
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (166 - 268, n=24)	205 Seconds * +22%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	197 Seconds * +25%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	196 Seconds * +25%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	192 Seconds * +27%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	178 Seconds * +32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	171 Seconds * +35%

wPrime 2.10
32m
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	4.957 s * -41%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	4.111 s * -17%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3.523 s * -0%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	3.518 s *
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (3.14 - 3.52, n=3)	3.39 s * +4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3.254 s * +8%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2.703 s * +23%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2.626 s * +25%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2.563 s * +27%
1024m
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	441.275 s * -7%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	412.775 s *
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (179.5 - 429, n=3)	341 s * +17%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	240.083 s * +42%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	202.68 s * +51%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	139.617 s * +66%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	98.896 s * +76%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	72.819 s * +82%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	67.933 s * +84%

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 1
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	335.5 (329^min - 340^max) fps +12%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	325 (323^min - 328^max) fps +8%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	300.5 (288^min - 319^max) fps
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	298 (288^min - 300^max) fps -1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	298 (297^min - 305^max) fps -1%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (284 - 301, n=3)	294 fps -2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	289 (286^min - 292^max) fps -4%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	273 (264^min - 275^max) fps -9%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	262 (259^min - 282^max) fps -13%
Pass 2
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	158.2 (157.4^min - 158.8^max) fps +39%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	154.15 (153.8^min - 154.3^max) fps +35%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	150.65 (150.4^min - 154.2^max) fps +32%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	149.3 (148.8^min - 149.8^max) fps +31%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	143.7 (143^min - 145.2^max) fps +26%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (110.2 - 138.6, n=3)	120.9 fps +6%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	113.95 (106.5^min - 136.6^max) fps
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	94.7 (87.4^min - 101.7^max) fps -17%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	92.2 (91^min - 114.5^max) fps -19%

WinRAR - Result
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7945 KB/s +17%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7940 KB/s +17%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7843 KB/s +15%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7723 KB/s +14%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	7699 KB/s +13%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (6365 - 9303, n=3)	7489 KB/s +10%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	7327 KB/s +8%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	6800 KB/s
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	6079 KB/s -11%

TrueCrypt
AES Mean 100MB
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	15.4 GB/s +17%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	14.9 GB/s +13%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	14.4 GB/s +9%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (13.2 - 14.8, n=3)	13.8 GB/s +5%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	13.2 GB/s
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11.3 GB/s -14%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	11.2 GB/s -15%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10.6 GB/s -20%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	9.5 GB/s -28%
Twofish Mean 100MB
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	2.4 GB/s
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (2.3 - 2.5, n=3)	2.4 GB/s 0%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2.1 GB/s -12%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2 GB/s -17%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2 GB/s -17%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1.9 GB/s -21%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1.8 GB/s -25%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	1.7 GB/s -29%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1.7 GB/s -29%
Serpent Mean 100MB
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1.4 GB/s +17%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1.3 GB/s +8%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1.3 GB/s +8%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (1.2 - 1.4, n=3)	1.3 GB/s +8%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1.2 GB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1.1 GB/s -8%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1.1 GB/s -8%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1 GB/s -17%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	0.935 GB/s -22%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13392 Points +19%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12662 Points +12%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (9094 - 15410, n=26)	12649 Points +12%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	12481 Points +11%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	12177 Points +8%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12143 Points +8%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	11283 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	10028 Points -11%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	9159 Points -19%
Single-Core
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1996 Points +8%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1958 Points +6%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1943 Points +6%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (1140 - 2043, n=26)	1895 Points +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1856 Points +1%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1841 Points
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	1824 Points -1%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1790 Points -3%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1746 Points -5%

Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Multi-Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13228 Points +18%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12438 Points +11%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	12386 Points +11%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (11168 - 14172, n=8)	12381 Points +11%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12086 Points +8%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	11933 Points +7%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	11168 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	9892 Points -11%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	9000 Points -19%
5.0 Single-Core
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1906 Points +5%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1900 Points +5%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1900 Points +5%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	1826 Points +1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1821 Points +1%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1810 Points
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (1654 - 1958, n=8)	1801 Points 0%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1710 Points -6%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1708 Points -6%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	8178 Points +5%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	8084 Points +4%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	8048 Points +3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8034 Points +3%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (7253 - 8498, n=9)	7955 Points +2%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	7787 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7635 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7602 Points -2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6927 Points -11%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	49269 Points +18%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	48743 Points +16%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	47960 Points +15%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	47777 Points +14%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (41851 - 54848, n=9)	47143 Points +13%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	45250 Points +8%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	41851 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	37359 Points -11%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	33052 Points -21%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	22978 Points +25%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	22960 Points +25%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	21875 Points +19%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (15540 - 25420, n=29)	21781 Points +18%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	21762 Points +18%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	20846 Points +13%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	18383 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	16634 Points -10%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	15245 Points -17%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	72684 MIPS +39%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	71934 MIPS +37%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	71874 MIPS +37%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	70733 MIPS +35%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	66438 MIPS +27%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (45045 - 79032, n=25)	66435 MIPS +27%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	52479 MIPS
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	47146 MIPS -10%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	43201 MIPS -18%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6668 MIPS +5%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6644 MIPS +5%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6563 MIPS +4%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	6321 MIPS
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (3665 - 6600, n=25)	6054 MIPS -4%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	5904 MIPS -7%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	5881 MIPS -7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5560 MIPS -12%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5485 MIPS -13%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	20.9 fps +48%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	20.9 fps +48%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	20.9 fps +48%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	20.5 fps +45%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	19.6 fps +39%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (14.1 - 22.3, n=25)	18.5 fps +31%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	14.1 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	12.3 fps -13%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	11.4 fps -19%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4652 sec * -6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	0.4632 sec * -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	0.4627 sec * -5%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (0.4052 - 0.723, n=25)	0.4493 sec * -2%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	0.4463 sec * -2%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4395 sec *
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	0.4392 sec * -0%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	0.4354 sec * +1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	0.4346 sec * +1%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	53.9 s * -37%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	49.9 s * -27%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	49.5 s * -26%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (34.4 - 82.8, n=25)	47.6 s * -21%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	47.5 s * -21%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	44.5 s * -13%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	40.9 s * -4%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	39.6 s * -1%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	39.4 s *

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	324 Points +7%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	316 Points +4%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	316 Points +4%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	304 Points
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (171.4 - 340, n=20)	302 Points -1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	300 Points -1%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	291 Points -4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	276 Points -9%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	264 Points -13%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	535 ms * -3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	532 ms * -3%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	517 ms * -0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	517 ms * -0%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	517 ms *
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	511 ms * +1%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (456 - 828, n=24)	507 ms * +2%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	505 ms * +2%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	502 ms * +3%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	28906 Points +22%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	27732 Points +17%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (17733 - 32664, n=30)	26658 Points +13%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	26194 Points +11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	26038 Points +10%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	25043 Points +6%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	23626 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	22242 Points -6%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	18564 Points -21%
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (7863 - 13726, n=29)	11535 Points +23%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11481 Points +23%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	11298 Points +21%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	11159 Points +19%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	10824 Points +16%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10014 Points +7%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	9347 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7985 Points -15%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	7942 Points -15%

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	8.774 s * -18%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7.454 s * -0%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	7.445 s *
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	7.331 s * +2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7.168 s * +4%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7.045 s * +5%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (6.16 - 7.51, n=3)	7.04 s * +5%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	6.784 s * +9%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	6.751 s * +9%

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	21.271 s * -31%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	18.138 s * -12%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	17.549 s * -8%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	16.424 s * -1%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	16.234 s *
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.125 s * +1%
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (13.8 - 16.4, n=3)	15.5 s * +5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	14.879 s * +8%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	14.771 s * +9%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	724.411 s * -74%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	665.289 s * -60%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	624.748 s * -50%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	417.103 s *
Media Intel Core i9-13900H (350 - 425, n=3)	397 s * +5%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	396.475 s * +5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	394.754 s * +5%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P	384.074 s * +8%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	304.446 s * +27%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

9550

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

15509 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

79014 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

13820 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

14766

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

53438

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

2.66 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

24.38 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit

96.79 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.98 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

27.48 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

98.43 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

245 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2260 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

103.95 fps

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

659 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

5013 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

13015 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1715 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

104 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

703 Points

Aiuto

... in confronto

Performance Rating
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	98 pt
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	92.2 pt
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	68.8 pt
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	68.6 pt
Media della classe Mini PC	57.1 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	56.6 pt
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	51.9 pt
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	49.6 pt
Geekom Mini IT12 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	42.3 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	26889 KRay/s +129%
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	26146 KRay/s +123%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	14418 KRay/s +23%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	14406 KRay/s +23%
Media della classe Mini PC (646 - 51004, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	12878 KRay/s +10%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	11735 KRay/s
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	11188 KRay/s -5%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	9567 KRay/s -18%
Geekom Mini IT12 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7933 KRay/s -32%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	116269 Points +97%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	113684 Points +92%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	91475 Points +55%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	89540 Points +52%
Media della classe Mini PC (3857 - 214250, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	64921 Points +10%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	59094 Points
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	56942 Points -4%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	47763 Points -19%
Geekom Mini IT12 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	40251 Points -32%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	4953 MB/s +82%
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	4890 MB/s +80%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	3117 MB/s +15%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	3065 MB/s +13%
Media della classe Mini PC (260 - 9399, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	2856 MB/s +5%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2718 MB/s
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2669 MB/s -2%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2430 MB/s -11%
Geekom Mini IT12 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2006 MB/s -26%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	119569 Points +27%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	117103 Points +25%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	99180 Points +6%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	93952 Points
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	93870 Points 0%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	86881 Points -8%
Media della classe Mini PC (8172 - 184747, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	80187 Points -15%
Geekom Mini IT12 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	73765 Points -21%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	65324 Points -30%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	15312 Points +91%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	15145 Points +89%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	12642 Points +58%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	11771 Points +47%
Media della classe Mini PC (408 - 29064, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	8812 Points +10%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8026 Points
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7246 Points -10%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5734 Points -29%
Geekom Mini IT12 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5567 Points -31%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	62219 Points +114%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	60809 Points +109%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	50025 Points +72%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	49558 Points +70%
Media della classe Mini PC (1987 - 113499, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	33863 Points +16%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	29138 Points
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	28019 Points -4%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	22832 Points -22%
Geekom Mini IT12 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	19857 Points -32%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	170745 MB/s +66%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	124515 MB/s +21%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	119363 MB/s +16%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	102677 MB/s
Media della classe Mini PC (3691 - 325960, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	88382 MB/s -14%
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	86346 MB/s -16%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	80041 MB/s -22%
Geekom Mini IT12 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	74716 MB/s -27%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	53328 MB/s -48%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	1114 MB/s +41%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	1075 MB/s +36%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	789 MB/s
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	775 MB/s -2%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	754 MB/s -4%
Media della classe Mini PC (74.9 - 2039, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	740 MB/s -6%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	671 MB/s -15%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	578 MB/s -27%
Geekom Mini IT12 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	575 MB/s -27%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	14472 KRay/s +133%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	14284 KRay/s +130%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	7680 KRay/s +24%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	7551 KRay/s +22%
Media della classe Mini PC (350 - 26952, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	6881 KRay/s +11%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6205 KRay/s
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5957 KRay/s -4%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4975 KRay/s -20%
Geekom Mini IT12 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4156 KRay/s -33%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	43544 MPixel/s +54%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	40460 MPixel/s +43%
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	32647 MPixel/s +15%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	30049 MPixel/s +6%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon 680M	30038 MPixel/s +6%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	29263 MPixel/s +4%
Media della classe Mini PC (4408 - 50500, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	28301 MPixel/s 0%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	28269 MPixel/s
Geekom Mini IT12 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	28118 MPixel/s -1%

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

Uno sguardo al ciclo continuo di Cinebench R15 mostra che è possibile ottenere un risultato significativamente migliore all'inizio. Durante il primo ciclo, il Intel Core i9-13900H può mantenere il valore PL2 (64 watt) un po' più a lungo rispetto ai cicli successivi. Tuttavia, con alcune eccezioni, il SoC offre poi prestazioni stabili a un massimo di 35 watt.

Metriche della CPU durante il ciclo di Cinebench R15

Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø1776 (1688.48-2326.12)

Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2605 (2564.1-2649.53)

Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2646 (2612.16-2667.2)

Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø1878 (1825.15-2068.58)

Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1753 (1686.77-2083.33)

Geekom Mini IT12 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Core i7-1260P: Ø1280 (1241-1619.37)

ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2050 (2014.91-2082.68)

Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1443 (1386.82-1627.54)

Prestazioni del sistema

Nel complesso, Geekom GT13 Pro padroneggia abbastanza bene i test di sistema. Tuttavia, il sistema di prova ha difficoltà a reggere il confronto con i suoi concorrenti. Le perdite di prestazioni, in parte autoinflitte, molto probabilmente contribuiscono a questo risultato. Tuttavia, le prestazioni nei compiti quotidiani sono di buon livello. La generosa memoria di lavoro e l'archiviazione di massa veloce rendono il sistema soggettivamente ben performante.

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity

PCMark 10 / Score
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	7705 Points +30%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	7526 Points +27%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	7510 Points +26%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	7431 Points +25%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	7120 Points +20%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	6295 Points +6%
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	5944 Points
Khadas Mind, Intel Core i7-1360P Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	5937 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	11333 Points +10%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	11273 Points +9%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	11125 Points +8%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	11030 Points +7%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	11011 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10822 Points +5%
Khadas Mind, Intel Core i7-1360P Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	10761 Points +4%
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	10347 Points

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	11082 Points +51%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	10832 Points +48%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	10484 Points +43%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10482 Points +43%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	8901 Points +22%
Khadas Mind, Intel Core i7-1360P Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	8161 Points +12%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	8114 Points +11%
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	7319 Points

CrossMark: Overall | Responsiveness | Creativity | Productivity

CrossMark / Overall
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1939 Points +10%
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	1866 Points +6%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1860 Points +5%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1802 Points +2%
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	1766 Points
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1761 Points 0%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1675 Points -5%
Khadas Mind, Intel Core i7-1360P Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1564 Points -11%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1919 Points +7%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1849 Points +3%
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	1790 Points
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1700 Points -5%
Khadas Mind, Intel Core i7-1360P Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1528 Points -15%
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	1494 Points -17%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1378 Points -23%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1361 Points -24%

CrossMark / Creativity
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	2127 Points +19%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2040 Points +14%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2040 Points +14%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1929 Points +8%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1883 Points +5%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1870 Points +5%
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	1789 Points
Khadas Mind, Intel Core i7-1360P Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1600 Points -11%

CrossMark / Productivity
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1872 Points +8%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1831 Points +5%
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	1764 Points +2%
Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	1736 Points
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1717 Points -1%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1656 Points -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1589 Points -8%
Khadas Mind, Intel Core i7-1360P Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1541 Points -11%

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	71990 MB/s +57%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	68603 MB/s +50%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	67777 MB/s +48%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	67039 MB/s +47%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	65299 MB/s +43%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	62397 MB/s +36%
Media della classe Mini PC (6481 - 89287, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	48357 MB/s +6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	45792 MB/s 0%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	45721 MB/s

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	75449 MB/s +64%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	64323 MB/s +40%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	61867 MB/s +35%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	61710 MB/s +34%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	61006 MB/s +33%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	60668 MB/s +32%
Media della classe Mini PC (6914 - 99171, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	49177 MB/s +7%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	48963 MB/s +6%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	45995 MB/s

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	86974 MB/s +90%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	86693 MB/s +90%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	86677 MB/s +90%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	74777 MB/s +64%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	70596 MB/s +54%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	65057 MB/s +42%
Media della classe Mini PC (6862 - 98583, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	52856 MB/s +16%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	47201 MB/s +3%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	45733 MB/s

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	149 ns * -97%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	146.1 ns * -93%
Media della classe Mini PC (44.9 - 184.8, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	92.1 ns * -22%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	92 ns * -21%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	91.2 ns * -20%
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	90.5 ns * -19%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	88.6 ns * -17%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	75.8 ns *
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	74.7 ns * +1%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Latenze DPC

Purtroppo, Geekom GT13 Pro non raggiunge latenze DPC ottimali. Abbiamo già documentato un aumento delle latenze durante la navigazione in Internet, che aumentano di nuovo leggermente durante la riproduzione del video di prova 4K. Solo due fotogrammi caduti vanno bene e non riducono in alcun modo la qualità come client di streaming. Allo stesso tempo, l'iGPU è caricata al 45% circa.

Massima latenza quando si aprono più schede del browser e si riproduce materiale video in 4K

Latenza massima dopo dieci secondi di Prime95

Driver classificati in base al tempo di esecuzione più lungo

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2724 μs * -78%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2151 μs * -40%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	2097.9 μs * -37%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2069.2 μs * -35%
Geekom GT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	1533.4 μs *
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1178.9 μs * +23%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1001.9 μs * +35%
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	962 μs * +37%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Memoria di massa

Con 2 TB di spazio di archiviazione, il Geekom GT13 Pro è equipaggiato in modo eccellente e offre spazio di archiviazione sufficiente per molte applicazioni. È installato un SSD di Acer, che è impressionante in termini di prestazioni. I risultati documentati sono sufficienti per metterlo dietro all'Aoostar GEM12 Aoostar GEM12 per assicurarsi il secondo posto nella nostra valutazione. Tuttavia, l'SSD ha problemi a mantenere il suo alto livello di prestazioni sotto carico continuo. Sebbene il produttore abbia installato un raffreddamento passivo per l'SSD, alla fine non è sufficiente per mantenere stabili le prestazioni. Rispetto ai valori iniziali, la velocità di lettura scende di quasi il 50%. Tuttavia, non si tratta di un fallimento totale, come si può vedere dal grafico delle prestazioni continue. Con poco meno di 4.000 MB/s, l'Acer N7000 è ancora più veloce dei dispositivi di archiviazione di massa di altri mini-PC. Nel Geekom GT13 Pro è possibile installare un totale di due SSD. Tuttavia, va notato che il secondo slot M.2 supporta solo SSD SATA con una lunghezza di 42 millimetri.

Per ulteriori confronti e benchmark, faccia riferimento alla nostra Tabella di confronto.

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Acer N7000

Sequential Read: 4580 MB/s

Sequential Write: 4435 MB/s

512K Read: 2185 MB/s

512K Write: 3457 MB/s

4K Read: 71.73 MB/s

4K Write: 333.5 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 1047 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 779.3 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	89 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000	77 pt
Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	75.4 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	65.8 pt
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	60.1 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	58.1 pt
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	55.2 pt
Media della classe Mini PC	47.6 pt
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	45.7 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000	4357 (4314.26^min - 4356.72^max) MB/s
Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	3628 (3596.13^min - 3627.65^max) MB/s -17%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	3114 (3080.09^min - 3114.48^max) MB/s -29%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3108 (3065.99^min - 3107.56^max) MB/s -29%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2896 (2845^min - 2896.04^max) MB/s -34%
Media della classe Mini PC (277 - 4357, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	2333 MB/s -46%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2315 (2293.84^min - 2315.26^max) MB/s -47%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2178 (2158.39^min - 2177.68^max) MB/s -50%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1674 (1242.56^min - 1673.54^max) MB/s -62%
seq write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4619 (4584.79^min - 4619.39^max) MB/s +2%
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000	4544 (4380.79^min - 4543.83^max) MB/s
Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	4121 (3696.6^min - 4120.84^max) MB/s -9%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3736 (3562.44^min - 3735.53^max) MB/s -18%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3386 (3076.94^min - 3385.64^max) MB/s -25%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	3271 (3235.73^min - 3270.93^max) MB/s -28%
Media della classe Mini PC (229 - 5595, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	2509 MB/s -45%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2341 (2252.02^min - 2341.4^max) MB/s -48%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1348 (1117.85^min - 1347.87^max) MB/s -70%
seq q8 t1 read
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000	7007 (6166.72^min - 7006.62^max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	5213 (4500.71^min - 5212.95^max) MB/s -26%
Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	5168 (4831.21^min - 5167.59^max) MB/s -26%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4821 (4521.88^min - 4820.93^max) MB/s -31%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	4800 (4387.45^min - 4800.17^max) MB/s -31%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	4769 (3791.02^min - 4769.24^max) MB/s -32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4676 (4310.07^min - 4675.81^max) MB/s -33%
Media della classe Mini PC (236 - 8430, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	3790 MB/s -46%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	3194 (2810.81^min - 3194.17^max) MB/s -54%
seq q8 t1 write
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000	5261 (5018.9^min - 5261.3^max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4754 (4738.27^min - 4754.03^max) MB/s -10%
Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	4212 (3767.95^min - 4212.34^max) MB/s -20%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	4081 (3987.52^min - 4081.49^max) MB/s -22%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3910 (3902.59^min - 3909.87^max) MB/s -26%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3729 (3700.15^min - 3728.95^max) MB/s -29%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	3255 (2485.13^min - 3254.57^max) MB/s -38%
Media della classe Mini PC (239 - 6669, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	2810 MB/s -47%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2212 (1222.43^min - 2212.27^max) MB/s -58%
4k q1 t1 read
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000	85.3 (82.57^min - 85.32^max) MB/s
Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	83.7 (81.47^min - 83.67^max) MB/s -2%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	78.7 (78.09^min - 78.69^max) MB/s -8%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	64.9 (64.71^min - 64.94^max) MB/s -24%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	64.1 (56.32^min - 64.06^max) MB/s -25%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	63.5 (59.81^min - 63.5^max) MB/s -26%
Media della classe Mini PC (6.85 - 86.6, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	55.3 MB/s -35%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	54.4 (52.17^min - 54.39^max) MB/s -36%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	47.3 (47.07^min - 47.31^max) MB/s -45%
4k q1 t1 write
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000	327 (306.06^min - 326.78^max) MB/s
Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	301 (296.91^min - 301.44^max) MB/s -8%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	279 (237.61^min - 279.08^max) MB/s -15%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	274 (271.38^min - 273.89^max) MB/s -16%
Media della classe Mini PC (30.4 - 435, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	196.9 MB/s -40%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	196.1 (183.94^min - 196.13^max) MB/s -40%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	187.2 (181.54^min - 187.2^max) MB/s -43%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	184.4 (177.6^min - 184.36^max) MB/s -44%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	169.3 (157.77^min - 169.29^max) MB/s -48%
4k q32 t16 read
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000	3593 (3380.17^min - 3593.41^max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3197 (3174.44^min - 3196.85^max) MB/s -11%
Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2300 (2238.78^min - 2299.5^max) MB/s -36%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1824 (1239.47^min - 1824.09^max) MB/s -49%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	1558 (1523.21^min - 1557.75^max) MB/s -57%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1557 (1529.87^min - 1556.79^max) MB/s -57%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1452 (1402.67^min - 1451.9^max) MB/s -60%
Media della classe Mini PC (26.1 - 4158, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	1411 MB/s -61%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1143 (1091.01^min - 1142.98^max) MB/s -68%
4k q32 t16 write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3639 (3534.46^min - 3639.09^max) MB/s +378%
Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2441 (2189.1^min - 2441.28^max) MB/s +220%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1499 (1114.25^min - 1499.4^max) MB/s +97%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1434 (1410.26^min - 1433.71^max) MB/s +88%
Media della classe Mini PC (32.6 - 4288, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	1332 MB/s +75%
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000	762 (700.88^min - 761.76^max) MB/s
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	600 (492.7^min - 600.03^max) MB/s -21%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	565 (557.67^min - 564.75^max) MB/s -26%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	497 (467.49^min - 497.28^max) MB/s -35%

AS SSD
Score Total
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10021 Points +47%
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000	6798 Points
Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	6460 Points -5%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	5975 Points -12%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	5863 Points -14%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	5132 Points -25%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4987 Points -27%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	4412 Points -35%
Media della classe Mini PC (211 - 10021, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	4244 Points -38%
Score Read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3741 Points +31%
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000	2866 Points
Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2658 Points -7%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2119 Points -26%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1738 Points -39%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	1643 Points -43%
Media della classe Mini PC (76 - 3741, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	1578 Points -45%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1561 Points -46%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1482 Points -48%
Score Write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4371 Points +74%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3294 Points +31%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2807 Points +12%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2777 Points +10%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	2735 Points +9%
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000	2516 Points
Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2447 Points -3%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2082 Points -17%
Media della classe Mini PC (88 - 4371, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	1902 Points -24%
Seq Read
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000	4546 MB/s
Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	4496 MB/s -1%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	4349.85 MB/s -4%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4317 MB/s -5%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3822 MB/s -16%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3779 MB/s -17%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	3741 MB/s -18%
Media della classe Mini PC (291 - 6620, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	3231 MB/s -29%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	3010 MB/s -34%
Seq Write
Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	4258 MB/s +26%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4188 MB/s +24%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	3936.64 MB/s +17%
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000	3374 MB/s
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2463 MB/s -27%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2369 MB/s -30%
Media della classe Mini PC (242 - 5783, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	2292 MB/s -32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2285 MB/s -32%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	1897 MB/s -44%
4K Read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	89.3 MB/s +7%
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000	83.4 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	80.89 MB/s -3%
Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	76.3 MB/s -9%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	63.3 MB/s -24%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	61.9 MB/s -26%
Media della classe Mini PC (21.4 - 104.3, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	59.7 MB/s -28%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	50.3 MB/s -40%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	41.8 MB/s -50%
4K Write
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	316.33 MB/s +7%
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000	296 MB/s
Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	258 MB/s -13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	238 MB/s -20%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	221 MB/s -25%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	208 MB/s -30%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	196.9 MB/s -33%
Media della classe Mini PC (30.9 - 366, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	177.5 MB/s -40%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	171.7 MB/s -42%
4K-64 Read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3220 MB/s +38%
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000	2328 MB/s
Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2132 MB/s -8%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1602.91 MB/s -31%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1293 MB/s -44%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1218 MB/s -48%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	1218 MB/s -48%
Media della classe Mini PC (23.4 - 3220, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	1195 MB/s -49%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1041 MB/s -55%
4K-64 Write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3731 MB/s +98%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2840 MB/s +51%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	2374 MB/s +26%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2340 MB/s +24%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2066.57 MB/s +10%
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000	1883 MB/s
Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1763 MB/s -6%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1649 MB/s -12%
Media della classe Mini PC (32.8 - 3731, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	1495 MB/s -21%
Access Time Read
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.127 ms * -0%
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000	0.127 ms *
Media della classe Mini PC (0.022 - 0.489, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	0.09579 ms * +25%
Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	0.094 ms * +26%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.076 ms * +40%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	0.069 ms * +46%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.067 ms * +47%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	0.049 ms * +61%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	0.046 ms * +64%
Access Time Write
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	0.126 ms * -114%
Media della classe Mini PC (0.014 - 0.765, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	0.1133 ms * -92%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	0.072 ms * -22%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	0.059 ms * -0%
Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000	0.059 ms *
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.022 ms * +63%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.02 ms * +66%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.017 ms * +71%
Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	0.016 ms * +73%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Geekom GT13 Pro Acer N7000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5377 (3710.83-7006.62)

Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5121 (4152.57-5218.34)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4683 (3872.18-4767.25)

Geekom A8 Acer N5000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4786 (4324.07-4802.27)

Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1764 (1425.22-4795.56)

Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1320 (771.89-3141.95)

Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4795 (3366.33-4823.24)

Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00: Ø5222 (4952.01-5235.75)

Scheda grafica

La scelta del processore ha un impatto significativo sulle prestazioni 3D. Geekom ha optato per un Intel Core i9-13900Hl'iGPU è solo la Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7. Tuttavia, l'adattatore grafico con 96 EU viene utilizzato nel livello di configurazione più alto. Tuttavia, l'Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 non riesce più a tenere il passo con le iGPU più recenti dei modelli Meteor Lake. Vediamo quasi due classi nella classifica. Tutti i dispositivi dotati di Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 si trovano nel terzo inferiore. Le prestazioni tra i dispositivi sono quasi identiche. Tutti gli altri dispositivi che possono competere con iGPU più moderni e più potenti (Intel Arc 8 e AMD Radeon 780) si distinguono chiaramente.

Per ulteriori confronti e benchmark, la invitiamo a consultare la nostra Tabella di confronto delle GPU.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	96.8 pt
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	95.6 pt
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	94.6 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	93.9 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	92.3 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	59.1 pt
Khadas Mind Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	55.8 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	55.3 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	13533 Points +82%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	13410 Points +81%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	13347 Points +80%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12085 Points +63%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11691 Points +57%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	7424 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	6975 Points -6%
Khadas Mind Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	6722 Points -9%

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3205 Points +90%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3193 Points +89%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2901 Points +72%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2846 Points +68%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2832 Points +68%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1690 Points
Khadas Mind Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	1680 Points -1%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	1581 Points -6%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	8354 Points +44%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	8348 Points +44%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8007 Points +38%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7710 Points +33%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7599 Points +31%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	5812 Points
Khadas Mind Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	5461 Points -6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	5421 Points -7%

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	34.6 fps +38%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	34.5 fps +37%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	31.6 fps +26%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	29.7 fps +18%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	27.3 fps +9%
Khadas Mind Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	25.2 fps 0%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	25.1 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	21.8 fps -13%
Extreme Preset DX11
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	36.3 fps +40%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	35.5 fps +37%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	33.2 fps +28%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	32.8 fps +26%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	32.7 fps +26%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	26 fps
Khadas Mind Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	25.6 fps -2%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	22.7 fps -13%

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	24.5 fps +62%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	24 fps +59%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	19.1 fps +26%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	18.5 fps +23%
Khadas Mind Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	17.2 fps +14%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17.1 fps +13%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	15.1 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	13.3 fps -12%
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	32.4 fps +106%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	21 fps +34%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	20.8 fps +32%
Khadas Mind Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	20.4 fps +30%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	18.3 fps +17%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	15.7 fps
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	15.2 fps -3%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	13.9 fps -11%

Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12174 Points +84%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	12023 Points +82%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	10702 Points +62%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10491 Points +58%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	10102 Points +53%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	6619 Points
Khadas Mind Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	6265 Points -5%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	5950 Points -10%
1920x1080 1080p High
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	3648 Points +58%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	3592 Points +56%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3391 Points +47%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	3387 Points +47%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3341 Points +45%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	2306 Points
Khadas Mind Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	2279 Points -1%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	2035 Points -12%
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1920 Points +71%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1812 Points +61%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1800 Points +60%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1737 Points +55%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1585 Points +41%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1124 Points
Khadas Mind Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	1101 Points -2%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	1042 Points -7%

ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	10102 Points +177%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	9494 Points +160%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	8909 Points +144%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7480 Points +105%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	6270 Points +72%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	3650 Points
Khadas Mind Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	3605 Points -1%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	3390 Points -7%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	492 Points +72%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	483 Points +69%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	469 Points +64%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	468 Points +64%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	427 Points +49%
Khadas Mind Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	385 Points +35%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	286 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	231 Points -19%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	492 Points +67%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	488 Points +66%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	481 Points +64%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	462 Points +57%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	422 Points +44%
Khadas Mind Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	354 Points +20%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	294 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	246 Points -16%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2637 Points +202%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2477 Points +184%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2356 Points +170%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1961 Points +125%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1620 Points +86%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	873 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	860 Points -1%
Khadas Mind Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	830 Points -5%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2757 Points +210%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2519 Points +184%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2345 Points +164%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1594 Points +80%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1274 Points +43%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	888 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	872 Points -2%
Khadas Mind Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	864 Points -3%
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	3752 Points +186%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	3535 Points +170%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	3225 Points +146%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3076 Points +135%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2444 Points +87%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1310 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	1182 Points -10%
Khadas Mind Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	1174 Points -10%

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1173 Samples/s +80%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	807 Samples/s +24%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	801 Samples/s +23%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	651 Samples/s
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	640 Samples/s -2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	549 Samples/s -16%
Sala GPUs-only
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2732 Samples/s +30%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2319 Samples/s +10%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	2104 Samples/s
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1546 Samples/s -27%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1496 Samples/s -29%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	991 Samples/s -53%

Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5308 Points +19%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	4928 Points +10%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	4460 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	3830 Points -14%
Khadas Mind Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	3724 Points -17%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1709 Points -62%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1512 Points -66%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1399 Points -69%

Photoshop PugetBench - GPU Score
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	114.5 Points +30%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	103.4 Points +17%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	98 Points +11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	92.3 Points +4%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	88.4 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	79.4 Points -10%

Premiere Pro PugetBench - GPU 0.9
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.8 Points +107%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	11.4 Points +41%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	11.2 Points +38%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	8.1 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	7.6 Points -6%
Khadas Mind Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	7.2 Points -11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	6.8 Points -16%

DaVinci Resolve PugetBench - GPU Effects 0.93
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	20 Points +67%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	18 Points +50%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17 Points +42%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	12 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	11 Points -8%

	Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-13900H	Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900H	Khadas Mind, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i7-1360P	Aoostar GEM12, AMD Radeon 780M R7 8845HS	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 9 185H	Geekom A8, AMD Radeon 780M R9 8945HS	Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 7 155H	Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX, AMD Radeon 780M R7 7840HS	Media della classe Mini PC
SPECviewperf 12		-5%	-9%	662%	20%	674%	26%	725%	456%
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)	41.4	40.1 -3%	37.8 -9%	85.7 107%	49.7 20%	87.4 111%	49.8 20%	85 105%	75.4 ?(13.6 - 295, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) 82%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)	38.6	37.1 -4%	39.4 2%	86.6 124%	51.3 33%	86.4 124%	48.2 25%	89.8 133%	64.2 ?(10.9 - 251, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) 66%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)	28.2	26.9 -5%	7.37 -74%	53.3 89%	22.7 -20%	55.1 95%	23.1 -18%	51.1 81%	37 ?(4.03 - 117, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) 31%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)	0.41	0.4 -2%	0.46 12%	18.4 4388%	0.67 63%	19 4534%	0.91 122%	20.1 4802%	13.3 ?(0.15 - 80.4, n=57, ultimi 2 anni) 3144%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)	42.4	38.3 -10%	41.3 -3%	67.3 59%	58 37%	75 77%	54.9 29%	73.4 73%	64 ?(11.4 - 226, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) 51%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)	12.2	11.8 -3%	12 -2%	51.4 321%	15.9 30%	47.7 291%	16.9 39%	61.7 406%	28.5 ?(2.53 - 136, n=60, ultimi 2 anni) 134%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)	19.1	16.6 -13%	21.2 11%	30.3 59%	19.9 4%	25.8 35%	18.2 -5%	30.1 58%	35.3 ?(5.71 - 133, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) 85%
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)	46.6	45.3 -3%	41.6 -11%	114 145%	43 -8%	106 127%	42.7 -8%	113 142%	72.4 ?(20.9 - 243, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) 55%
SPECviewperf 13		-5%	-3%	165%	13%	160%	14%	186%	106%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)	41.2	40.1 -3%	39 -5%	82.4 100%	48.5 18%	85.8 108%	46.4 13%	86.1 109%	74.8 ?(13.4 - 294, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) 82%
Catia (catia-05)	54.7	51.3 -6%	57.1 4%	124 127%	76.8 40%	126 130%	71.6 31%	132 141%	91.4 ?(15.6 - 381, n=62, ultimi 2 anni) 67%
Creo (creo-02)	42.7	41.1 -4%	37.5 -12%	90.7 112%	29.3 -31%	92.8 117%	29.6 -31%	93.6 119%	73 ?(11.6 - 275, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) 71%
Energy (energy-02)	4.62	4.5 -3%	4.34 -6%	22.2 381%	5.27 14%	22.6 389%	5.69 23%	25.8 458%	17.7 ?(0.92 - 310, n=60, ultimi 2 anni) 283%
Maya (maya-05)	51.6	47.5 -8%	46.3 -10%	109 111%	62.5 21%	103 100%	59.5 15%	108 109%	97.5 ?(15.9 - 340, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) 89%
Medical (medical-02)	15.6	14.4 -8%	16 3%	70.5 352%	25 60%	69.2 344%	29.7 90%	79.8 412%	37.6 ?(2.28 - 198, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) 141%
Showcase (showcase-02)	19.1	17.3 -9%	21.4 12%	29.9 57%	19.9 4%	24.2 27%	18.2 -5%	30 57%	35 ?(5.69 - 133, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) 83%
Solidworks (sw-04)	58.3	57.1 -2%	53.7 -8%	104 78%	45.6 -22%	97.3 67%	44.8 -23%	107 84%	76.6 ?(27.4 - 223, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) 31%
SPECviewperf 2020		-2%	-1%	309%	38%	367%	29%	288%	193%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)	2.69	3.49 30%	2.67 -1%	11.2 316%	4.23 57%	10.9 305%	5.05 88%	12 346%	7.85 ?(0.78 - 30.8, n=66, ultimi 2 anni) 192%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)	3.17	3.05 -4%	2.97 -6%	19.9 528%	6.03 90%	31 878%	4.61 45%	15.4 386%	11.3 ?(0.52 - 47.9, n=66, ultimi 2 anni) 256%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)	16.3	14.8 -9%	16.9 4%	33.4 105%	18.5 13%	35.6 118%	17.9 10%	31.4 93%	30.7 ?(7.73 - 97.5, n=66, ultimi 2 anni) 88%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)	8.53	7.78 -9%	8.82 3%	23.2 172%	11.1 30%	24.6 188%	10 17%	24.4 186%	18.6 ?(4.61 - 64.1, n=65, ultimi 2 anni) 118%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)	10.3	9.69 -6%	10.1 -2%	20.4 98%	14.9 45%	21 104%	12.9 25%	21 104%	22.5 ?(5.53 - 87.5, n=66, ultimi 2 anni) 118%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)	6.62	6.29 -5%	6.01 -9%	64.1 868%	6.24 -6%	65.9 895%	5.7 -14%	61.5 829%	37.2 ?(2.25 - 224, n=64, ultimi 2 anni) 462%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)	27.3	23.9 -12%	27.8 2%	47.7 75%	37.7 38%	50.1 84%	35.4 30%	47.2 73%	58.9 ?(12.2 - 223, n=66, ultimi 2 anni) 116%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)		-4% / -4%	-4% / -5%	379% / 381%	24% / 23%	400% / 402%	23% / 23%	400% / 405%	252% / 254%

3DMark 05 Standard		43190 punti
3DMark 06 Standard Score		33774 punti
3DMark Vantage P Result		28241 punti
3DMark 11 Performance		8027 punti
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		147975 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		27505 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score		5420 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		2573 punti
3DMark Time Spy Score		1926 punti
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		186 punti
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		1283 punti
Aiuto

... in confronto

Prestazioni di gioco

Molti giochi moderni sovraccaricano l'iGPU Intel Iris Xe. Tuttavia, possiamo notare che in alcuni giochi è ancora possibile ottenere frame rate giocabili, se si sacrifica il livello di dettaglio. Tuttavia, non possiamo certificare che il Geekom GT13 Pro sia adatto al gioco in questa configurazione. Le prestazioni 3D sono nettamente superiori con il Geekom A8 o il Aoostar GEM12. In alternativa, può anche dare un'occhiata al modello Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti che ha ricevuto un'iGPU significativamente più potente con il SoC Meteor Lake di Intel.

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	44 (37.6^min) fps +142%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	42.4 (35.7^min) fps +133%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	34.3 (29.1^min) fps +88%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	29.5 (24.1^min) fps +62%
Geekom GT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	18.2 (14.7^min) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	16.4 (13.6^min) fps -10%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	26.3 (22.2^min) fps +105%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	24 (20.6^min) fps +88%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	22.4 (15.6^min) fps +75%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	20.4 (13.8^min) fps +59%
Geekom GT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	12.8 (10.9^min) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	11.5 (10^min) fps -10%

Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Low Preset
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	38.6 (26.3^min, 27.1^P0.1, 29.9^P1) fps +114%
Geekom GT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	18 (5.95^min, 5.96^P0.1, 6.91^P1) fps
1920x1080 High Preset
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	24.7 (16.6^min, 17.1^P0.1, 19.4^P1) fps +111%
Geekom GT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	11.7 (3.43^min, 3.51^P0.1, 3.99^P1) fps

Borderlands 3
1280x720 Very Low Overall Quality (DX11)
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	102.5 fps +88%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	100.3 fps +84%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	97.3 fps +79%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	93 fps +71%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	68.5 fps +26%
Geekom GT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	54.4 fps
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	50.7 fps -7%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	49.2 fps -10%
1920x1080 High Overall Quality (DX11)
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	33.3 fps +99%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	31.7 fps +90%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	28.7 fps +72%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	27.8 fps +66%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	27.7 fps +66%
Geekom GT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	16.7 fps
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	15.3 fps -8%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	14.9 fps -11%

GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	166.9 (5.05^min, 125^P1) fps +39%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	165.1 (4.83^min, 125^P1) fps +38%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	164.4 (4.9^min, 111.1^P1) fps +37%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	163.6 (4.63^min, 111.1^P1) fps +37%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	161 (4.76^min, 100^P1) fps +35%
Geekom GT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	119.7 (7.51^min, 66.7^P1) fps
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	112.7 (9.9^min, 71.4^P1) fps -6%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	66.9 (3.09^min, 45.5^P1) fps +204%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	65.3 (4.57^min, 45.5^P1) fps +197%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	64.7 (4.56^min, 31.3^P1) fps +194%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	41.2 (3.12^min, 30.3^P1) fps +87%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	31.3 (2.94^min, 22.7^P1) fps +42%
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	23.6 (10.9^min, 18.2^P1) fps +7%
Geekom GT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	22 (6.3^min, 16.4^P1) fps

Far Cry 5
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	88 (77^min) fps +52%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	87 (75^min) fps +50%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	84 (73^min) fps +45%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	79 (39^min) fps +36%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	69 (25^min) fps +19%
Geekom GT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	58 (52^min) fps
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	54 (44^min) fps -7%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	50 (45^min) fps -14%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	47 (42^min) fps +68%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	45 (39^min) fps +61%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	42 (34^min) fps +50%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	42 (33^min) fps +50%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	37 (30^min) fps +32%
Geekom GT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	28 (20^min) fps
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	26 (23^min) fps -7%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	23 (21^min) fps -18%

Far Cry New Dawn
1280x720 Low Preset
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	76 (58^min) fps +46%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	75 (58^min) fps +44%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	72 (54^min) fps +38%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	69 (2^min) fps +33%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	65 (11^min) fps +25%
Geekom GT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	52 (39^min) fps
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	49 (32^min) fps -6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	47 (31^min) fps -10%
1920x1080 High Preset
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	45 (37^min) fps +55%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	44 (37^min) fps +52%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	41 (32^min) fps +41%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	39 (25^min) fps +34%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	37 (25^min) fps +28%
Geekom GT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	29 (23^min) fps
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	27 (20^min) fps -7%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	24 (18^min) fps -17%

Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	161.5 (141.6^min) fps +47%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	159.7 (142.1^min) fps +45%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	152.7 (134.2^min) fps +39%
Geekom GT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	109.8 (85^min) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	106.5 (61^min) fps -3%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	106.3 (81.7^min) fps -3%
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	104.2 (79.7^min) fps -5%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	103.2 (59.8^min) fps -6%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	97.45 (86.9^min) fps +49%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	88.3 (74.1^min) fps +35%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	86.6 (72.2^min) fps +32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	79 (48.2^min) fps +21%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	77.3 (52.5^min) fps +18%
Geekom GT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	65.5 (56.1^min) fps
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	61.7 (51.7^min) fps -6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	61.3 (54.1^min) fps -6%

F1 2020
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	201 (180^min) fps +114%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	197.3 (171^min) fps +110%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	184.7 (163^min) fps +97%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	139.1 (126^min) fps +48%
Geekom GT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	93.8 (83^min) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	84.5 (74^min) fps -10%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	79.3 (67^min) fps +105%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	76.4 (67^min) fps +97%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	73.6 (62^min) fps +90%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	60.5 (51^min) fps +56%
Geekom GT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	38.7 (32^min) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	34.2 (29^min) fps -12%

GRID Legends
1280x720 Low Preset
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	150.6 (52.6^min) fps +115%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	141.4 (2.69^min) fps +102%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	136.2 (6.48^min) fps +95%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	86.6 (7.26^min) fps +24%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	80 (35^min) fps +14%
Geekom GT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	69.9 (30^min) fps
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	53.5 (25.6^min) fps -23%
1920x1080 High Preset
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	68.8 (34.8^min) fps +123%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	62.3 (30.5^min) fps +102%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	56.4 (21.6^min) fps +83%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	44.8 (29.3^min) fps +45%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	41.7 (24^min) fps +35%
Geekom GT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	30.8 (20.2^min) fps
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	27.1 (19.2^min) fps -12%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1280x720 Lowest Preset
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	131.4 fps +130%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	109.2 fps +91%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	103.8 fps +82%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	79.3 fps +39%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	65.9 fps +15%
Geekom GT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	57.1 fps
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	43.7 fps -23%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	39.6 fps -31%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	49.5 fps +137%
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	41.2 fps +97%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	39.5 fps +89%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	35.8 fps +71%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	23.4 fps +12%
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	22.5 fps +8%
Geekom GT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	20.9 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	18.8 fps -10%

FPS chart

Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø11.1 (5.97-12.3)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M: Ø21.7 (20.1-23.3)

	basso	medio	alto	ultra
GTA V (2015)	119.7	97.4	22	9.07
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	109.8	80.2	65.5	58.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	45.1	25.3	18.2
Far Cry 5 (2018)	58	30	28	27
Strange Brigade (2018)	98.7	42.5	33.8	26.9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	57.1	22.2	20.9	18
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	52	31	29	27
Metro Exodus (2019)	38.5	19.1	14.2	11.2
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)	100.3	39.6	30.2	22.2
Borderlands 3 (2019)	54.4	26.5	16.7	12.7
F1 2020 (2020)	93.8	49.1	38.7	24.9
F1 2021 (2021)	105.6	52.2	39.9	29.4
GRID Legends (2022)	58.8	40.2	30.8	27.9
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	34	26.4	16.7	13.2
F1 22 (2022)	46.3	43.1	31.2	24.9
F1 23 (2023)	43.2	39.4	28	21.9
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	18	14	11.7	11.2
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	18.2	14.7	12.8	11.5
Total War Pharaoh (2023)	68.9	48.8	34.8	30.9
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024)		132.8	93.4	87.8
F1 24 (2024)	40.4	35.4	25.6	20.4

Verifica delle prestazioni di Geekom GT13 Pro con Razer Core X

Razer Core X con Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Geekom GT13 Pro consente l'utilizzo di schede grafiche esterne che possono essere collegate tramite USB4. Abbiamo dato un'occhiata più da vicino alle prestazioni insieme al Razer Core X e a una Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Come previsto, le prestazioni 3D possono essere aumentate in modo massiccio. Con questa combinazione, il mini-PC copre un'ampia gamma di compiti ed è adatto sia al gioco che all'editing video. Le prestazioni della Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, che è collegata solo tramite USB4, non possono tenere il passo con le prestazioni di un PC desktop convenzionale. L'ampiezza di banda disponibile per la comunicazione con la scheda grafica esterna è solo alla velocità PCIe x4 3.0.

Geekom GT13 Pro con Razer Core X e Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	99.2 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	98 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	95.4 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	34666 Points +367%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	33219 Points +347%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	32654 Points +340%
	7424 Points

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	11182 Points +562%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	11085 Points +556%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	11062 Points +555%
	1690 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	25468 Points +338%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	25462 Points +338%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	24796 Points +327%
	5812 Points
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	7139 Points +471%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	7047 Points +463%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7044 Points +463%
	1251 Points

Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	34168 Points +416%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	33894 Points +412%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	31903 Points +382%
	6619 Points
1920x1080 1080p High
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	15240 Points +561%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	15076 Points +554%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	14853 Points +544%
	2306 Points
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	7193 Points +540%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	7089 Points +531%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7055 Points +528%
	1124 Points
3840x2160 4k Optimized
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	9419 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	9240 Points
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	9205 Points
7680x4320 8k Optimized
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	4079 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	4042 Points
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	4013 Points

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	144.5 fps +857%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	143.9 fps +853%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	141.6 fps +838%
	15.1 fps
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	138.6 fps +783%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	138.2 fps +780%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	137.5 fps +776%
	15.7 fps

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	174.9 fps +597%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	173.6 fps +592%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	172.1 fps +586%
	25.1 fps
Extreme Preset DX11
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	163.6 fps +529%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	163.2 fps +528%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	162.5 fps +525%
	26 fps

ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	28156 Points +671%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	27929 Points +665%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	25975 Points +612%
	3650 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	2719 Points +851%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2687 Points +840%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	2527 Points +784%
	286 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	2663 Points +806%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2622 Points +792%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	2463 Points +738%
	294 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	5769 Points +561%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	5742 Points +558%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	5342 Points +512%
	873 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	6335 Points +613%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6283 Points +608%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	5881 Points +562%
	888 Points
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	10671 Points +715%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	10594 Points +709%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	9762 Points +645%
	1310 Points

DaVinci Resolve PugetBench - GPU Effects 0.93
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	72 Points +500%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	69 Points +475%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	69 Points +475%
	12 Points

Photoshop PugetBench - GPU Score
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	100.6 Points +14%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	93.7 Points +6%
	88.4 Points
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	81.6 Points -8%

Premiere Pro PugetBench - GPU 0.9
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	55.8 Points +589%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	48 Points +493%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	45.6 Points +463%
	8.1 Points

	basso	medio	alto	ultra	QHD	4K DLSS	4K
GTA V (2015)	182.1	178	170.7	103.6	91.6		103.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	180.5	157.2	146.6	133.3			108.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	188	142.7	98.6		78		48.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	151.3	135	106.6				95.4
Far Cry 5 (2018)	160	138	132	121	99		58
Strange Brigade (2018)	214	160.5	156.8	152.9	130.2		84.5
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	118.5	101	100.8	98.5	85.9		49.6
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	138	119	115	104	93		60
Metro Exodus (2019)	144.8	91.6	69.6	52.5	45.8		33.7
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)	300.4	145.6	95	70.1	49.3		26.7
Borderlands 3 (2019)	155.8	132.4	104.8	84.6	64.6		38.3
F1 2020 (2020)	207	127.8	128.9	105.5	90.6		61.4
F1 2021 (2021)	143.5	110.1	69.1	51.7	48.1		41.4
Far Cry 6 (2021)	78	65	53.9	46.9	45.8
GRID Legends (2022)	119.2	99.7	84	70.9	64.7		51
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	178.2	138.7	100.2	81.4	61.7		36.1
F1 22 (2022)	61.4	56.1	43.2	27.6	26.2		19.6
F1 23 (2023)	67.9	66.2	54.6	33.3	31.9		10.3
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	113.4	90.8	78.9	79	61.4	54.7	36.9
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	85.3	80.4	71.3	63.9	44.9		22.1
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023)	88	82	77	63	59		56
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023)	53	49	43	30	23		9.7
Skull & Bones (2024)	83	77	64	54	45		31
F1 24 (2024)	77.3	72.8	61.3	42	36.5	28.9	19.6

	Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-13900H	Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), i9-13900H	Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), R9 8945HS	Minisforum MS-01 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), i9-13900H	Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), i9-12900H
SPECviewperf 12		679%	674%	687%	630%
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)	41.4	147 255%	146 253%	147 255%	124 200%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)	38.6	116 201%	112 190%	116 201%	95.2 147%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)	28.2	62.9 123%	62.9 123%	64.2 128%	53.5 90%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)	0.41	13.4 3168%	13.3 3144%	13.4 3168%	13.4 3168%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)	42.4	228 438%	235 454%	235 454%	182 329%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)	12.2	73.4 502%	74.8 513%	76.4 526%	74.4 510%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)	19.1	149 680%	141 638%	149 680%	123 544%
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)	46.6	77.2 66%	81.6 75%	84.6 82%	71.7 54%
SPECviewperf 13		386%	374%	385%	311%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)	41.2	147 257%	145 252%	147 257%	124 201%
Catia (catia-05)	54.7	164 200%	163 198%	163 198%	135 147%
Creo (creo-02)	42.7	232 443%	231 441%	231 441%	194 354%
Energy (energy-02)	4.62	25.9 461%	25.9 461%	25.9 461%	24 419%
Maya (maya-05)	51.6	363 603%	351 580%	361 600%	298 478%
Medical (medical-02)	15.6	65.2 318%	64.1 311%	64.9 316%	56.7 263%
Showcase (showcase-02)	19.1	151 691%	141 638%	150 685%	125 554%
Solidworks (sw-04)	58.3	127 118%	125 114%	129 121%	102 75%
SPECviewperf 2020		390%	518%	436%	327%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)	2.69	10.8 301%	10.8 301%	10.8 301%	11.8 339%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)	3.17	21 562%	50.3 1487%	31.1 881%	18.9 496%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)	16.3	76.4 369%	76.6 370%	76.8 371%	62.7 285%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)	8.53	40.1 370%	38.8 355%	39.7 365%	32.8 285%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)	10.3	47.3 359%	45.9 346%	47.6 362%	40 288%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)	6.62	16.5 149%	16.6 151%	16.6 151%	15.2 130%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)	27.3	196 618%	195 614%	197 622%	155 468%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)		485% / 489%	522% / 522%	503% / 505%	423% / 427%

Emissioni - IceBlast 1.5 raggiunge rapidamente il suo limite

Emissioni di rumore

In termini di raffreddamento, Geekom GT13 Pro è molto limitato a causa del suo design. Tuttavia, il mini-PC è ancora estremamente silenzioso quando è al minimo, anche se la piccola ventola può essere chiaramente udibile sotto carico. Nel test, abbiamo misurato un livello massimo di pressione sonora di 48,5 dB(A). Il GT13 Pro raggiunge questo livello di rumore solo per un breve periodo, fino a quando viene raggiunto il valore PL2. In caso di carico prolungato, il SoC lavora con il limite PL1, il che significa che il volume si stabilizza a circa 39 dB(A). Se non c'è un carico permanente, che simuliamo ad esempio con Prime95, la ventola lavora in modo molto nervoso. Il livello di pressione sonora sotto carico medio oscilla da 38 a 44 dB(A) nel nostro campione di prova.

Rumorosità

Idle		27.9 / 27.9 / 28 dB(A)
Sotto carico		43.8 / 48.5 dB(A)

	30 dB silenzioso 40 dB(A) udibile 50 dB(A) rumoroso
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm di distanza) Rumorosità ambientale: 24.3 dB(A)

	Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	Khadas Mind i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Noise		9%	1%	4%	2%	2%	6%	-13%
off /ambiente *	24.3	24.3 -0%	24.1 1%	24.4 -0%	25.4 -5%	24.9 -2%	24.8 -2%	25.2 -4%
Idle Minimum *	27.9	27.5 1%	29.8 -7%	24.5 12%	28 -0%	25.4 9%	28.5 -2%	34.4 -23%
Idle Average *	27.9	27.6 1%	29.9 -7%	24.7 11%	28.1 -1%	25.7 8%	28.5 -2%	34.4 -23%
Idle Maximum *	28	27.6 1%	30 -7%	24.7 12%	28.5 -2%	25.7 8%	28.7 -3%	34.5 -23%
Load Average *	43.8	36 18%	37.3 15%	48.5 -11%	39.6 10%	47.8 -9%	32.4 26%	44.7 -2%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	45.4	35.4 22%
Load Maximum *	48.5	38.2 21%	43.5 10%	49.2 -1%	44.2 9%	49 -1%	39.6 18%	50.4 -4%
Witcher 3 ultra *		35.4	40.2	47	47.2	45.23	32.7	49

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Temperatura

L'involucro del Geekom GT13 Pro si riscalda sensibilmente sia al minimo che sotto carico. Sotto carico, le temperature superficiali aumentano di nuovo leggermente. Tuttavia, i 50 °C non vengono raggiunti del tutto. Registriamo temperature relativamente elevate con l'Intel Core i9-13900H, il che è dovuto alla scarsa ventilazione dell'unità di raffreddamento compatta. A 100 °C, il SoC raggiunge il valore massimo che Intel stessa dichiara nelle specifiche. È importante sapere che i 100 °C vengono raggiunti solo per un breve periodo. La temperatura della CPU scende leggermente quando il PL1 funziona a un massimo di 35 watt. In media, la temperatura dell'Intel Core i9-13900H si assesta intorno ai 90 °C.

Geekom GT13 Pro stress test (lato superiore)

Geekom GT13 Pro stress test (lato inferiore)

Geekom GT13 Pro stress test (posteriore)

Carico massimo

Idle


47.9 °C	46.8 °C	48.2 °C
39.3 °C	41.7 °C	38.5 °C
37.7 °C	38.4 °C	38.1 °C

Massima: 48.2 °C
Media: 41.8 °C


42.4 °C	42.4 °C	39.8 °C
38.1 °C	45.7 °C	34.7 °C
39.8 °C	35.9 °C	32.4 °C

Massima: 45.7 °C
Media: 39 °C

Alimentazione (max) 40.6 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)

(-) La temperatura media del lato superiore sotto carico massimo e' di 41.8 °C / 107 F, rispetto alla media di 32.3 °C / 90 F per i dispositivi di questa classe Mini PC.
(-) La temperatura massima sul lato superiore è di 48.2 °C / 119 F, rispetto alla media di 35.8 °C / 96 F, che varia da 24 a 69.5 °C per questa classe Mini PC.
(-) Il lato inferiore si riscalda fino ad un massimo di 45.7 °C / 114 F, rispetto alla media di 36.1 °C / 97 F
(-) In idle, la temperatura media del lato superiore è di 38.2 °C / 101 F, rispetto alla media deld ispositivo di 32.3 °C / 90 F.

Gestione dell'energia

I mini-PC sono generalmente economici e richiedono una quantità di energia significativamente inferiore rispetto a un PC desktop convenzionale. Tuttavia, ci sono differenze tra i mini-PC in termini di consumo energetico. Con un consumo da 7,9 a 22,3 watt, il Geekom GT13 Pro non è particolarmente economico in modalità idle rispetto ai suoi concorrenti. Sotto carico medio, il nostro dispositivo di prova richiede 57 watt, mentre l'alimentatore da 120 watt deve fornire 93,4 watt al suo picco.

Consumo di corrente

Off / Standby	1.6 / 1.9 Watt
Idle	7.9 / 10.3 / 22.3 Watt
Sotto carico	57.44 / 93.4 Watt


Leggenda: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	Khadas Mind i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Media Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Media della classe Mini PC
Power Consumption		-7%	3%	31%	15%	1%	2%	18%	30%	-4%
Idle Minimum *	7.9	8.2 -4%	8.2 -4%	3.2 59%	5.7 28%	9.1 -15%	8.5 -8%	7.8 1%	5.34 ?(2.2 - 46.5, n=193) 32%	9.69 ?(1.9 - 45.7, n=121, ultimi 2 anni) -23%
Idle Average *	10.3	10 3%	12.1 -17%	4.9 52%	9.5 8%	10.3 -0%	10.5 -2%	10.9 -6%	8.55 ?(3.8 - 63, n=193) 17%	11.9 ?(1.9 - 47.5, n=119, ultimi 2 anni) -16%
Idle Maximum *	22.3	14.6 35%	14 37%	6.8 70%	16.5 26%	14.4 35%	12.9 42%	11.8 47%	10.8 ?(5.8 - 68.9, n=193) 52%	15.2 ?(2.6 - 57.1, n=121, ultimi 2 anni) 32%
Load Average *	57.44	73.9 -29%	53.1 8%	71.3 -24%	53.3 7%	54.9 4%	67.2 -17%	39.2 32%	45.3 ?(12.5 - 87.3, n=193) 21%	59 ?(11.3 - 170.6, n=121, ultimi 2 anni) -3%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	55.9	79.9 -43%
Load Maximum *	93.4	95.3 -2%	100.4 -7%	93.2 -0%	87.8 6%	110.4 -18%	97.2 -4%	76.4 18%	67.5 ?(30.1 - 123.3, n=193) 28%	100.5 ?(18.1 - 423, n=121, ultimi 2 anni) -8%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Efficiency overview

Power Consumption: Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor) | Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor

Power Consumption / Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor)
Geekom A8	35.8 Points per Watt +44%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti	31.2 Points per Watt +26%
Acemagic F2A	26.6 Points per Watt +7%
Geekom GT13 Pro	24.8 Points per Watt
Geekom XT12 Pro	24.7 Points per Watt 0%

Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Geekom A8	61.7 Points per Watt +14%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti	55.6 Points per Watt +2%
Geekom GT13 Pro	54.3 Points per Watt
Acemagic F2A	54.2 Points per Watt 0%
Geekom XT12 Pro	37.1 Points per Watt -32%

Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Geekom A8	251 Points per Watt +20%
Geekom GT13 Pro	210 Points per Watt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti	205 Points per Watt -2%
Acemagic F2A	183.7 Points per Watt -13%
Geekom XT12 Pro	182.7 (48.6^min, 48.7^P1 - 81.3^max) Points per Watt -13%

Power consumtion with external monitor

Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø17.4 (12.6-22.4)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10 (9.28-14.3)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø12.2 (10.9-14.1)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10.4 (9.08-14.4)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø79.6 (76-85.2)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø43.8 (42.6-45.7)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø48.4 (45.6-52.4)

Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø60.2 (57-86.6)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø84.4 (83.6-85.1)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø91.8 (87.6-95.4)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø92.2 (78.7-114)

Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø55.9 (54.2-59.2)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø79.9 (75.5-83.5)

Power consumtion with external monitor

Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø59.5 (53.5-84.7)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø83.6 (80.7-95.3)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø98.1 (94.2-100.4)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø99.6 (92-110.4)

Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø91.2 (88.5-93.4)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø82.1 (74.2-89.2)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø88 (87.7-88.3)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103 (99.2-107)

Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31.6 (29-59.5)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø34 (31.1-57.1)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø33.3 (28.9-63)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø32.7 (19.4-55.3)

Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø62.1 (50.4-89.7)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø75.3 (72.3-87.5)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø87.7 (87.3-88.3)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø100.7 (97.2-108.6)

Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø54.6 (51.3-69.7)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø83.1 (79.2-88.5)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø50.3 (47.7-65.3)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø49.7 (47.3-60.6)

Pro

+ alloggiamento da 0,5L estremamente compatto e robusto

+ scelta di materiali di alta qualità

+ wLAN veloce

+ 2x USB4

+ è possibile utilizzare contemporaneamente un massimo di quattro schermi

+ consumo energetico relativamente basso

+ generoso SSD con 2 TB di spazio di archiviazione

+ Lettore di schede SD con supporto UHS

+ 36 mesi di garanzia

Contro

- L'unità di raffreddamento lavora rapidamente al limite

- chiaramente udibile sotto carico

- basso utilizzo del Turbo del processore

- relativamente costoso

Verdetto - Aspetto grandioso con prestazioni medie a un prezzo superiore

Geekom GT13 Pro in recensione - fornito da Geekom

Il produttore commercializza un PC elegante e molto compatto come Geekom GT13 Pro. Con l'Intel Core i9-13900H, è presente un potente SoC, che non si basa sull'attuale architettura Meteor Lake. In linea di principio, il processore offre prestazioni adeguate se non si generano necessariamente carichi continui. Grazie al suo design ridotto, l'Intel Core i9-13900H può essere utilizzato solo con un consumo energetico molto basso.

Il Geekom GT13 Pro è un mini-PC elegante e potente e colpisce per le sue ottime caratteristiche. Purtroppo, il prezzo non è all'altezza delle prestazioni del Geekom GT13 Pro.

Visivamente, il Geekom GT13 Pro colpisce per il suo design elegante. Il look non è completamente nuovo, in quanto il Geekom A7 e il Geekom A8 sono già basati sullo stesso alloggiamento. In termini di colore, Geekom adotta un approccio diverso con il GT13 Pro, distinguendolo dalle sue controparti AMD. La connettività è uno dei punti di forza di Geekom GT13 Pro ed è persino leggermente migliore di quella dei concorrenti interni sopra citati. Le due porte USB4 sono buone e possono fare la differenza nella pratica se è necessario collegare molti dispositivi esterni. Il Geekom GT13 Pro ha superato perfettamente il test con una scheda grafica esterna, anche se i suoi concorrenti non sono stati da meno nemmeno in questo caso. Geekom non dovrebbe perdere di vista la possibilità di offrire un'interfaccia OCuLink, per non perdere il contatto con alcuni dei suoi avversari. Finché Thunderbolt 5 non sarà disponibile, l'interfaccia OCuLink è attualmente l'opzione migliore quando si tratta di utilizzare schede grafiche esterne.

Il design compatto è elegante e anche i materiali scelti sono di alta qualità. Tuttavia, Geekom deve chiedersi se il concetto è quello giusto quando si tratta di ospitare componenti molto potenti in uno spazio molto piccolo. Il case offre un flusso d'aria limitato, rendendo difficile il raffreddamento del processore. In definitiva, questo significa che il Geekom GT13 Pro è chiaramente udibile sotto carico. Minisforum e Aoostar dimostrano con i loro dispositivi che anche i componenti più potenti possono essere raffreddati in modo molto più silenzioso.

Infine, dobbiamo considerare di nuovo il prezzo: Al momento del test, il Geekom GT13 Pro costa 930 euro nella nostra configurazione. Ciò significa che il GT13 Pro non è davvero un affare e probabilmente avrà difficoltà a competere con i suoi concorrenti, alcuni dei quali sono significativamente più economici.

Prezzi e disponibilità

Il Geekom GT13 Pro può essere ordinato nella nostra configurazione di prova presso Geekom o Amazon. Il prezzo è di 930 euro. Attualmente c'è uno sconto del cinque percento utilizzando i seguenti codici: Geekom store: "NBCGT13", Amazon: "NBCGT130612".

Geekom GT13 Pro - 06/21/2024 v8
Sebastian Bade

Chassis

87 / 98 → 89%

Connettività

71 / 81 → 88%

Peso

84%

Prestazioni di gioco

27 / 80 → 34%

Prestazioni Applicazioni

80 / 92 → 87%

Workstation

24%

AI Performance

80%

Temperatura

81%

Rumorosità

75%

Media

53%

72%

Mini PC - Media ponderata

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
62.7%

Repairability
50%

Software Updates
39%

Total Sustainability Score: 33.6%

Articoli collegati

Geekom GT13 Pro (GT Serie)

recensione

•

Recensione del Geekom GT1 Mega: Il primo mini PC AI di Geekom non convince ...

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 470341 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione del mini-PC Geekom GT13 Pro - Elegante alternativa al NUC con Intel Core i9-13900H, 32 GB di RAM DDR4 e 2 TB SSD

Sebastian Bade, 2024-06-23 (Update: 2024-06-23)