Recensione del Mini-PC Aoostar GEM12: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS con 32 GB di RAM, 1 TB SSD e interfaccia OCuLink

Name: Aoostar GEM12
Brand: Aoostar

Suggerimento sul rapporto prezzo/prestazioni?

Aoostar GEM12 combina un potente e moderno AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS con 32 GB di RAM e un SSD da 1 TB in un case relativamente compatto. La connettività è superiore alla media e consente il semplice collegamento di schede grafiche esterne tramite OCuLink. Abbiamo messo alla prova Aoostar GEM12 e analizzato le sue prestazioni in dettaglio.

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (traduzione a cura di DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/16/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Mini PC Desktop AMD Ryzen (Zen) Radeon Thunderbolt

Recentemente abbiamo dato un'occhiata più da vicino al più piccolo Aoostar GEM10 e ora siamo pronti a testare Aoostar GEM12. Visivamente, il GEM12 appartiene chiaramente alla famiglia Aoostar. Rispetto al modello Aoostar GEM10 il GEM12 è leggermente più grande. Nella configurazione con le massime prestazioni, che è la base di questo test, un AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS viene utilizzato. In alternativa, Aoostar GEM12 è disponibile anche con AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS o AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX quest'ultimo è in grado di gestire solo processori DDR5 4.800 MT/s. Questi ultimi possono gestire solo DDR5 4.800 MT/s per motivi tecnici, mentre i due modelli Ryzen 7 funzionano con DDR5 5.600 MT/s.

Il dispositivo di prova con 32 GB di RAM e 1 TB di SSD costa almeno 649 dollari USA - un prezzo giustificato e che non sembra eccessivo se si guardano i dati tecnici rispetto ai concorrenti. Aoostar GEM12 è disponibile anche in versione barebone a 499 dollari USA. Se ha bisogno direttamente di 64 GB di RAM, deve preventivare un prezzo di 749 dollari USA. Riteniamo che questo sia un prezzo ragionevole al momento.

Nel test, l'Aoostar GEM12 deve tenere testa agli attuali mini-PC. Tra le altre cose, valutiamo anche le prestazioni del mini-PC rispetto ai rivali più costosi. Tuttavia, Aoostar GEM12 ha un concorrente molto serio in Aoostar GEM10, che è anche significativamente più economico. Può trovare una panoramica dei dispositivi di confronto per questa recensione nella seguente panoramica.

Dispositivo di test fornito da Aoostar

Scarica la tua immagine come PNG / SVG

Aoostar GEM12

Processore

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)

Scheda grafica

AMD Radeon 780M, Core: 2700 MHz

Memoria

32 GB

, DDR5-5600

Scheda madre

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Harddisk

Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, 1024 GB

, NVMe, 881 GB libera

Scheda audio

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Porte di connessione

2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen 2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Porta Docking, Connessioni Audio: 3.5mm Audio Jack

Rete

Intel Ethernet Controller I226-V (10/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Dimensioni

altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 60 x 130 x 130

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Altre caratteristiche

12 Mesi Garanzia

Peso

653 gr, Alimentazione: 279 gr

Prezzo

649 US-Dollar

Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

guarda tutte le specifiche

Potenziali concorrenti a confrontos

Data	Modello	Memoria	Peso	Altezza
06/2024	Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	32768 MB	653 gr	60 mm
05/2024	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	32768 MB	863 gr	48.6 mm
05/2024	Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	32768 MB	432 gr	38 mm
04/2024	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	32768 MB	768 gr	57 mm
04/2024	Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	32768 MB	545 gr	37 mm
05/2024	Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	32768 MB	615 gr	55 mm
04/2024	Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	32768 MB	600 gr	58 mm
	Aoostar GEM10 R7 6800H, Radeon 680M	32768 MB	525 gr	60 mm

Aoostar GEM12 con alimentatore (19 V; 6,32 A)

Cassa - Alluminio e plastica in una buona combinazione

Aoostar GEM12 Pro e Aoostar GEM12 (Fonte: Aoostar)

Aoostar GEM12 con due opzioni di colore (Fonte: Aoostar)

I modelli GEM di Aoostar sono visivamente simili. Con 13 x 13 centimetri, Aoostar GEM12 occupa leggermente più spazio sulla scrivania rispetto ad Aoostar GEM10 (10,7 x 10,7 centimetri). Nel grafico, si può notare che alcuni dispositivi occupano ancora più spazio. Con un'altezza di 6 centimetri, i dispositivi Aoostar sono leggermente più spessi dei loro concorrenti. In termini di selezione dei materiali, vediamo una buona combinazione di plastica e alluminio. Quest'ultimo è utilizzato principalmente per l'involucro, il che significa che l'Aoostar GEM12 dà anche un'ottima impressione aptica. La parte inferiore, invece, è in plastica, come la maggior parte dei dispositivi. C'è anche un piccolo elemento in plastica sulla parte superiore, che aggiunge solo valore visivo al dispositivo. Nonostante i materiali di alta qualità, Aoostar GEM12 non è fuori dal comune in termini di peso. La nostra bilancia segna solo poco più di 650 grammi. L'alimentatore stesso pesa 278 grammi e quindi è circa lo stesso peso della maggior parte degli altri mini-PC in questa classe di prestazioni.

Aoostar ha anche un GEM12 Pro nel suo portafoglio, che è dotato di un piccolo display e di uno scanner di impronte digitali. Purtroppo, il modello non-Pro non ne è dotato. Aoostar offre due opzioni di colore, come si può vedere nelle immagini del produttore. In termini di prezzo, c'è una differenza di 20 dollari tra il modello nero e quello argento, a favore della versione argento.

Confronto delle dimensioni

Caratteristiche - USB4 e OCuLink sono a bordo

Le connessioni si trovano solo sulla parte anteriore e posteriore. In termini di numeri, l'Aoostar GEM12 non è eccessivamente ben equipaggiato e in questo caso è piuttosto nella media: Ci sono in totale quattro prese USB Tipo-A, due delle quali, tuttavia, forniscono solo lo standard lento 2.0. Inoltre, è sempre necessaria una connessione USB-C per l'alimentazione. Almeno USB4 e persino OCuLink sono installati. Come per il modello Aoostar GEM10critichiamo la posizione della porta OCuLink che, a nostro avviso, sarebbe meglio collocata sul retro. Sul retro, vediamo anche una porta HDMI 2.1 e una DisplayPort 1.4 per l'uscita delle immagini. Qui si trovano anche due connessioni di rete.

C'è un punto importante da notare quando si utilizza l'interfaccia OCuLink: La porta non è hot-swap, il che significa che il mini-PC deve essere spento prima di collegare una eGPU. Lo stesso vale per la rimozione dei dispositivi collegati tramite OCuLink. I difetti causati da un uso improprio non sono coperti dalla garanzia del produttore.

Le connessioni esterne di Aoostar GEM12 (Fonte: Aoostar)

Comunicazione

Un modulo Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 è responsabile della comunicazione wireless nell'Aoostar GEM12. Il modulo WLAN è in grado di gestire le frequenze di 2,4 e 5 GHz e ha ottenuto risultati accettabili nel test. Il nostro campione di prova si colloca quindi nella fascia media buona. Per questo test abbiamo utilizzato il router Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000. Per trasferire grandi quantità di dati, consigliamo di utilizzare una connessione via cavo. In questo caso, Aoostar GEM12 è dotato di due prese RJ45 - 2,5 GBit/s ciascuna.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1599 (802^min - 1683^max) MBit/s +116%
Media Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (451 - 1746, n=23)	1274 MBit/s +72%
Geekom A8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1101 (606^min - 1257^max) MBit/s +49%
Media della classe Mini PC (320 - 1796, n=113, ultimi 2 anni)	945 MBit/s +28%
Geekom XT12 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	892 (460^min - 921^max) MBit/s +21%
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	838 (728^min - 926^max) MBit/s +13%
Aoostar GEM12 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	740 (676^min - 758^max) MBit/s
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 MediaTek MT7921	503 (371^min - 687^max) MBit/s -32%
Acemagic AM18 Realtek RTL8852BE	455 (221^min - 519^max) MBit/s -39%
Aoostar GEM10 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	451 (228^min - 466^max) MBit/s -39%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1566 (904^min - 1695^max) MBit/s +113%
Media Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (429 - 1748, n=23)	1164 MBit/s +58%
Geekom A8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1105 (489^min - 1222^max) MBit/s +50%
Media della classe Mini PC (184.1 - 1776, n=113, ultimi 2 anni)	874 MBit/s +19%
Aoostar GEM12 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	736 (369^min - 756^max) MBit/s
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	709 (369^min - 977^max) MBit/s -4%
Acemagic AM18 Realtek RTL8852BE	665 (343^min - 743^max) MBit/s -10%
Geekom XT12 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	589 (295^min - 624^max) MBit/s -20%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 MediaTek MT7921	531 (255^min - 725^max) MBit/s -28%
Aoostar GEM10 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	429 (325^min - 510^max) MBit/s -42%

Aoostar GEM12 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø739 (676-758)

Acemagic AM18 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø448 (221-519)

Aoostar GEM10 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø442 (228-466)

Aoostar GEM12 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø724 (369-756)

Acemagic AM18 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø654 (343-743)

Aoostar GEM10 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø429 (325-510)

Accessori

La scatola, relativamente piccola, contiene Aoostar GEM12, l'alimentatore da 120 watt e una guida rapida. C'è anche un cavo di collegamento HDMI e un supporto VESA con viti. Il produttore include anche due raffreddatori passivi per SSD con cuscinetti termici e un set di piedini in gomma come accessori aggiuntivi.

Manutenzione

Sapendo che Aoostar GEM12 viene offerto in versione barebone, tra le altre cose, è importante che il dispositivo sia facile da aprire. Per accedere agli slot SSD o RAM, è necessario rimuovere solo la parte inferiore. Le quattro viti che fissano il coperchio all'alloggiamento si trovano sotto i piedini di gomma. Bisogna fare attenzione quando si apre il coperchio per evitare di danneggiare le antenne WLAN. C'è anche una piccola ventola sul lato inferiore. Dopo aver rimosso la piastra di base, i due slot SSD e i due slot SO-DIMM sono facilmente accessibili. Nel nostro sistema di prova, uno slot M.2-2280 è ancora libero per un ulteriore supporto dati.

Prestazioni - Sempre otto core e 16 thread nel GEM12 di Aoostar

Aoostar GEM12 è una centrale elettrica compatta e offre otto core con 16 thread in ogni configurazione. Nel test, ci dedichiamo al AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS - il modello più veloce attualmente installato nel GEM12. In alternativa, può anche passare al modello AMD Ryzen 7 7840HSo al modello AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX. Dotato di 32 GB di RAM e di un SSD da 1 TB, Aoostar GEM12 è in grado di gestire anche compiti ad alta intensità di memoria. Secondo il produttore, è possibile installare un massimo di 128 GB di RAM DDR5 veloce.

Condizioni del test

Abbiamo utilizzato il profilo energetico "Prestazioni elevate" per tutti i test sulle prestazioni con questo dispositivo. Inoltre, non sono state apportate modifiche al BIOS, quindi tutti i valori sono stati determinati in base alle impostazioni di fabbrica.

Processore

Tre modalità di alimentazione disponibili (fonte: Aoostar)

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS si basa sull'architettura Zen4 e combina otto core di calcolo nativi, che garantiscono un'elevata velocità di lavoro. Tuttavia, Aoostar GEM12 non è in grado di superare sostanzialmente i suoi concorrenti. Insieme al AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Acemagic AM18 offre all'incirca le stesse prestazioni, anche se un AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX è più lento di circa dieci punti percentuali nella nostra valutazione. Questi due processori sono interessanti insieme all'AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, poiché il mini-PC GEM12 è disponibile anche con questi SoC.

Se diamo un'occhiata al modello di punta di Intel - Core 9 Ultra 185H - che è installato nel Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, a prima vista non c'è differenza di prestazioni. Nei singoli test, tuttavia, il modello Intel offre quasi il 10-15 percento in più di prestazioni multi-thread.

Il produttore pubblicizza un consumo massimo di 70 watt, che viene memorizzato come modalità di prestazioni nel BIOS. La modalità bilanciata con un massimo di 65 watt è l'impostazione predefinita. Esiste anche un'opzione di modalità silenziosa, che significa che il processore ha solo 54 watt disponibili al picco delle prestazioni. Abbiamo eseguito tutti i test in modalità bilanciata. In modalità prestazioni, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS è in grado di offrire circa il 5% in più di prestazioni multi-thread

Per ulteriori confronti e benchmark, la invitiamo a consultare la nostra Tabella di confronto delle CPU.

Risultati di Cinebench - Modalità silenziosa - PL2 54 W; PL1 45 W

Risultati del Cinebench - Modalità bilanciata - PL2 65 W; PL1 54 W

Risultati di Cinebench - Modalità Performance - PL2 70 W; PL1 65 W

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	58.2 pt
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	57.1 pt
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	57 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	56.9 pt
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	56.9 pt
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	56.9 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	55.6 pt
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	55.5 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	52.1 pt
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	51.7 pt
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	50.9 pt

Cinebench 2024
CPU Multi Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1067 Points +14%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1022 Points +10%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	967 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	933 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	923 Points -1%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (880 - 956, n=4)	918 Points -2%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (567 - 956, n=9)	853 Points -9%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	746 Points -20%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	709 Points -24%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (666 - 724, n=2)	695 Points -26%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	578 Points -38%
CPU Single Core
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	114 Points +7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	110 Points +3%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	108 Points +1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	108 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	107 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	106 Points -1%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (101 - 107, n=4)	104.5 Points -2%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (102 - 107.8, n=6)	104.1 Points -3%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	104 Points -3%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (91 - 92, n=2)	91.5 Points -14%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	88 Points -18%

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	18497 Points +15%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	18016 Points +12%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	16795 Points +4%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (15515 - 17214, n=17)	16414 Points +2%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14895 - 18037, n=11)	16146 Points 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	16130 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	15979 Points -1%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	14659 Points -9%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (9709 - 15100, n=19)	13307 Points -18%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	13117 Points -19%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	11036 Points -32%
Single Core
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1901 Points +7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1851 Points +4%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1825 Points +2%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1824 Points +2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1783 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1771 Points -1%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (1718 - 1812, n=17)	1768 Points -1%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1623 - 1783, n=11)	1747 Points -2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1737 Points -3%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1516 - 1616, n=19)	1565 Points -12%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1542 Points -14%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	287 Points +3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	279 Points
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (270 - 286, n=17)	278 Points 0%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (269 - 283, n=11)	276 Points -1%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	274 Points -2%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	270 Points -3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	268 Points -4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	258 Points -8%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	251 Points -10%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (241 - 261, n=19)	250 Points -10%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	240 Points -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2746 Points +8%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2738 Points +8%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2640 Points +4%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (2473 - 2729, n=17)	2598 Points +2%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2342 - 2908, n=11)	2556 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2537 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2505 Points -1%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	2249 Points -11%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1588 - 2411, n=19)	2163 Points -15%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	2121 Points -16%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2117 Points -17%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	734 Points +6%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	715 Points +3%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	711 Points +3%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	701 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	691 Points
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (661 - 705, n=17)	686 Points -1%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (673 - 698, n=11)	685 Points -1%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	679 Points -2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	673 Points -3%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (595 - 631, n=19)	610 Points -12%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	598 Points -13%
CPU (Multi Core)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7196 Points +13%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7188 Points +13%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6591 Points +4%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (6061 - 6744, n=17)	6414 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6346 Points
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5808 - 7026, n=11)	6309 Points -1%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6250 Points -2%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	5691 Points -10%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5216 Points -18%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (3742 - 5813, n=19)	5162 Points -19%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	4294 Points -32%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	3.45 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	3.32 Points
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (3.29 - 3.33, n=2)	3.31 Points 0%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (3.29 - 3.32, n=2)	3.31 Points 0%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	3.29 Points -1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3.27 Points -2%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	3.26 Points -2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3.13 Points -6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	2.99 Points -10%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (2.86 - 3.07, n=8)	2.94 Points -11%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2.86 Points -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	33.95 Points +14%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	33.49 Points +13%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	31.31 Points +5%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (29.7 - 30.3, n=2)	30 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	29.76 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	29.7 Points 0%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (29.3 - 29.8, n=2)	29.5 Points -1%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	27.25 Points -8%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	24.57 Points -17%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (19 - 26.4, n=8)	23.9 Points -20%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	21.11 Points -29%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	15303 Points +8%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	14561 Points +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	14374 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	14163 Points
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ()	14163 Points 0%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (14015 - 14177, n=2)	14096 Points 0%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	14015 Points -1%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13938 Points -2%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	13378 Points -6%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (11870 - 12943, n=8)	12332 Points -13%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	12142 Points -14%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	95005 Points +11%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	90144 Points +5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	88902 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	85872 Points
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ()	85872 Points 0%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (83726 - 87064, n=2)	85395 Points -1%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	83726 Points -2%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	75947 Points -12%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	70792 Points -18%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (55915 - 77450, n=8)	69650 Points -19%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	69621 Points -19%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	296 Seconds * -50%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	259 Seconds * -31%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (212 - 357, n=21)	239 Seconds * -21%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	234 Seconds * -19%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	202 Seconds * -3%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (179 - 216, n=11)	202 Seconds * -3%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (185 - 229, n=18)	198.6 Seconds * -1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	197 Seconds *
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	196 Seconds * +1%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	178 Seconds * +10%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	171 Seconds * +13%

wPrime 2.10
32m
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	4.111 s * -52%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (3.46 - 4.69, n=7)	4 s * -48%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2.7 - 5.3, n=2)	4 s * -48%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	3.55 s * -31%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3.523 s * -30%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	3.454 s * -28%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3.254 s * -20%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2.703 s *
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2.658 s * +2%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (2.63 - 2.66, n=2)	2.64 s * +2%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2.563 s * +5%
1024m
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	441.275 s * -346%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	202.68 s * -105%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	186.394 s * -88%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	139.617 s * -41%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (98.9 - 170, n=2)	134.4 s * -36%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (93.2 - 149.4, n=7)	114.7 s * -16%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	98.896 s *
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	97.298 s * +2%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (71.9 - 72.8, n=2)	72.4 s * +27%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	71.922 s * +27%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	67.933 s * +31%

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 1
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	335.5 (329^min - 340^max) fps +16%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	325 (323^min - 328^max) fps +12%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	317.5 (292^min - 319^max) fps +10%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	298 (297^min - 305^max) fps +3%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (282 - 298, n=2)	290 fps 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	289 (286^min - 292^max) fps
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ()	289 fps 0%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	281.5 (277^min - 286^max) fps -3%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	262 (259^min - 282^max) fps -9%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (241 - 263, n=7)	254 fps -12%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	251.5 (250^min - 256^max) fps -13%
Pass 2
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	158.2 (157.4^min - 158.8^max) fps +10%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	154.15 (153.8^min - 154.3^max) fps +7%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	150.65 (150.4^min - 154.2^max) fps +5%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (144.1 - 149.3, n=2)	146.7 fps +2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	144.1 (143.9^min - 145.6^max) fps 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	143.7 (143^min - 145.2^max) fps
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ()	143.7 fps 0%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	125.05 (112.4^min - 132^max) fps -13%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	122.2 (120.3^min - 126.1^max) fps -15%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (93.3 - 127.8, n=7)	115.2 fps -20%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	92.2 (91^min - 114.5^max) fps -36%

WinRAR - Result
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (7327 - 19008, n=2)	13168 KB/s +80%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	8735 KB/s +19%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7945 KB/s +8%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7940 KB/s +8%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7843 KB/s +7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7723 KB/s +5%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	7327 KB/s
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (6428 - 7699, n=2)	7064 KB/s -4%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (6795 - 6980, n=7)	6875 KB/s -6%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6428 KB/s -12%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5890 KB/s -20%

TrueCrypt
AES Mean 100MB
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	15.4 GB/s +7%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (14.7 - 14.9, n=2)	14.8 GB/s +3%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	14.7 GB/s +2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	14.4 GB/s
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14 - 14.4, n=2)	14.2 GB/s -1%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	13.5 GB/s -6%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	13 GB/s -10%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (9.3 - 13.5, n=7)	11.8 GB/s -18%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11.3 GB/s -22%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	11.2 GB/s -22%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10.6 GB/s -26%
Twofish Mean 100MB
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	2.2 GB/s +10%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2.1 GB/s +5%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (2.1 - 2.1, n=2)	2.1 GB/s +5%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2 GB/s 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2 GB/s
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2 - 2, n=2)	2 GB/s 0%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1.9 GB/s -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1.8 GB/s -10%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1.8 GB/s -10%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1.7 GB/s -15%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1.3 - 1.8, n=7)	1.643 GB/s -18%
Serpent Mean 100MB
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1.4 GB/s +8%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1.3 GB/s 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1.3 GB/s
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (1.3 - 1.3, n=2)	1.3 GB/s 0%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1.3 - 1.3, n=2)	1.3 GB/s 0%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1.2 GB/s -8%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1.2 GB/s -8%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1.1 GB/s -15%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1.1 GB/s -15%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (0.857 - 1.2, n=7)	1.094 GB/s -16%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1 GB/s -23%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13392 Points +10%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12662 Points +4%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	12481 Points +3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12143 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	12049 Points -1%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11256 - 12726, n=12)	11855 Points -2%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (8446 - 12339, n=20)	11674 Points -4%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	10378 Points -15%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	10028 Points -17%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (8313 - 10490, n=21)	9642 Points -21%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	8898 Points -27%
Single-Core
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1996 Points +2%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (1837 - 2017, n=20)	1966 Points 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1958 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1946 Points -1%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1765 - 2004, n=12)	1924 Points -2%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1866 Points -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1856 Points -5%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1790 Points -9%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1746 Points -11%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1523 - 1652, n=21)	1589 Points -19%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1552 Points -21%

Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Multi-Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13228 Points +9%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12438 Points +3%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	12386 Points +2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12086 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	12019 Points -1%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11742 - 12109, n=3)	11979 Points -1%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (8572 - 12278, n=10)	11483 Points -5%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	10276 Points -15%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	9892 Points -18%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (9220 - 10426, n=15)	9880 Points -18%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	8868 Points -27%
5.0 Single-Core
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1906 Points 0%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1895 - 1914, n=3)	1903 Points 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1900 Points
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (1834 - 1936, n=10)	1891 Points 0%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1870 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1821 Points -4%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1795 Points -6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1710 Points -10%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1708 Points -10%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1531 - 1603, n=15)	1561 Points -18%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1509 Points -21%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	8178 Points +2%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (7924 - 8166, n=6)	8100 Points +1%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (8034 - 8063, n=2)	8049 Points 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8034 Points
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	7932 Points -1%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	7924 Points -1%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7635 Points -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7602 Points -5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6927 Points -14%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (6191 - 6804, n=11)	6642 Points -17%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	6341 Points -21%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	49269 Points +3%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (47599 - 48906, n=6)	48417 Points +1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	47960 Points 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	47777 Points
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (47602 - 47777, n=2)	47690 Points 0%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	47599 Points 0%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	45250 Points -5%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	39510 Points -17%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (36780 - 39852, n=11)	39028 Points -18%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	37359 Points -22%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	35898 Points -25%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	22978 Points +6%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	22786 Points +5%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (19492 - 26212, n=12)	22246 Points +2%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (17320 - 25584, n=23)	22172 Points +2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	21875 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	21762 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	20846 Points -4%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	18553 Points -15%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (15855 - 21036, n=23)	18161 Points -17%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	16634 Points -24%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	16034 Points -26%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	71934 MIPS +2%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	71874 MIPS +2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	70733 MIPS
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	70723 MIPS 0%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (59538 - 73035, n=18)	69127 MIPS -2%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (62669 - 74664, n=11)	67906 MIPS -4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	66438 MIPS -6%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (49526 - 65336, n=20)	60091 MIPS -15%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	55620 MIPS -21%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	55067 MIPS -22%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	47146 MIPS -33%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6668 MIPS 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6644 MIPS
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (6049 - 6754, n=18)	6561 MIPS -1%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6545 MIPS -1%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5197 - 6714, n=11)	6288 MIPS -5%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	6136 MIPS -8%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	5881 MIPS -11%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (5090 - 6070, n=20)	5799 MIPS -13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5560 MIPS -16%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5521 MIPS -17%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5485 MIPS -17%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	20.9 fps +2%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	20.9 fps +2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	20.5 fps 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	20.5 fps
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (18.6 - 22.7, n=11)	20 fps -2%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (11.7 - 21.8, n=18)	19.8 fps -3%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	19.6 fps -4%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (12.6 - 18.7, n=20)	16.7 fps -19%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	16.2 fps -21%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	14.9 fps -27%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	12.3 fps -40%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	0.515 sec * -17%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (0.4627 - 0.4974, n=20)	0.483 sec * -10%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4652 sec * -6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	0.4632 sec * -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	0.4627 sec * -5%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (0.4304 - 0.4935, n=11)	0.4528 sec * -3%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	0.4398 sec * -0%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (0.4184 - 0.4739, n=18)	0.4394 sec * -0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	0.4392 sec *
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	0.4391 sec * -0%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	0.4346 sec * +1%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (44.8 - 81.7, n=20)	53.1 s * -12%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	51.2 s * -8%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (44.4 - 77, n=11)	51 s * -7%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	49.9 s * -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	49.5 s * -4%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (38.3 - 68.3, n=18)	48.6 s * -2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	47.7 s * -0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	47.5 s *
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	44.5 s * +6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	39.6 s * +17%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	37.2 s * +22%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	320 Points +7%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (288 - 339, n=18)	317 Points +6%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	316 Points +5%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (275 - 334, n=11)	304 Points +1%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	301 Points 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	300 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	291 Points -3%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (248 - 304, n=17)	280 Points -7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	276 Points -8%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	275 Points -8%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	264 Points -12%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	591 ms * -14%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (564 - 607, n=18)	588 ms * -14%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (496 - 664, n=11)	537 ms * -4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	535 ms * -3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	532 ms * -3%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	518 ms * -0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	517 ms *
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	511 ms * +1%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (480 - 544, n=19)	508 ms * +2%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	505 ms * +2%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	499 ms * +3%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	27732 Points +6%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (24338 - 29343, n=24)	27607 Points +5%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (25099 - 30715, n=12)	27245 Points +4%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	27120 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	26194 Points
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	26093 Points 0%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	26038 Points -1%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	25043 Points -4%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (18389 - 27338, n=23)	24551 Points -6%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	23807 Points -9%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	22242 Points -15%
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11481 Points +6%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	11298 Points +4%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (8550 - 19164, n=12)	11294 Points +4%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (8903 - 12218, n=23)	10942 Points +1%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	10926 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	10824 Points
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	10402 Points -4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10014 Points -7%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (6621 - 11039, n=23)	9584 Points -11%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	8128 Points -25%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7985 Points -26%

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (7.11 - 8.77, n=2)	7.94 s * -8%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	7.839 s * -7%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (7.33 - 8.57, n=6)	7.8 s * -6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7.454 s * -2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	7.331 s *
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	7.281 s * +1%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (7.1 - 7.33, n=2)	7.22 s * +2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7.168 s * +2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	7.112 s * +3%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7.045 s * +4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	6.751 s * +8%

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (17.7 - 21.3, n=2)	19.5 s * -8%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	19.101 s * -5%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (16.4 - 20.7, n=6)	18.8 s * -4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	18.138 s *
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (17.6 - 18.1, n=2)	17.9 s * +1%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	17.697 s * +2%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	17.549 s * +3%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	16.498 s * +9%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	16.424 s * +9%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.125 s * +11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	14.879 s * +18%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	694.152 s * -4%
Media AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (655 - 724, n=2)	690 s * -4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	665.289 s *
Media AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (660 - 665, n=2)	662 s * -0%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	655.388 s * +1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	624.748 s * +6%
Media AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (386 - 693, n=6)	622 s * +7%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	397.363 s * +40%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	396.475 s * +40%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	394.754 s * +41%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	304.446 s * +54%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

7426

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

20330 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

85872 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

14163 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

16738

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

47500

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

2.92 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

26.58 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

3.32 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

29.76 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

279 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2537 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

224.66 fps

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

691 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6346 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

16130 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1783 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

107 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

933 Points

Aiuto

... in confronto

Performance Rating
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	97.2 pt
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	94.3 pt
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	90.2 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	80.7 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	76.7 pt
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	67 pt
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	59.2 pt
Media della classe Mini PC	56.7 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	51.1 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	26846 KRay/s +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	25916 KRay/s
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	25725 KRay/s -1%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	17544 KRay/s -32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	17312 KRay/s -33%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	13726 KRay/s -47%
Media della classe Mini PC (646 - 51004, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	12878 KRay/s -50%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	12389 KRay/s -52%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	10476 KRay/s -60%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	113406 Points +3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	109747 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	108506 Points -1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	91112 Points -17%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	88829 Points -19%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	86223 Points -21%
Media della classe Mini PC (3857 - 214250, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	64921 Points -41%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	64350 Points -41%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	54166 Points -51%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	4952 MB/s +5%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	4769 MB/s +2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	4695 MB/s
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	4343 MB/s -7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	4246 MB/s -10%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3028 MB/s -36%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	2953 MB/s -37%
Media della classe Mini PC (260 - 9399, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	2856 MB/s -39%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2504 MB/s -47%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	119802 Points +3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	116083 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	115133 Points -1%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	99851 Points -14%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	98582 Points -15%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	89748 Points -23%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	87291 Points -25%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	82291 Points -29%
Media della classe Mini PC (8172 - 184747, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	80187 Points -31%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	15026 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	14876 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	14590 Points -2%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	12159 Points -18%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	10759 Points -28%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	10247 Points -31%
Media della classe Mini PC (408 - 29064, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	8812 Points -41%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8417 Points -43%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7317 Points -51%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	60482 Points +3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	58597 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	57881 Points -1%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	47463 Points -19%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	45718 Points -22%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	44874 Points -23%
Media della classe Mini PC (1987 - 113499, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	33863 Points -42%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	31933 Points -46%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	26850 Points -54%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	169431 MB/s +98%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	163604 MB/s +91%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	154066 MB/s +80%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	144741 MB/s +69%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	119681 MB/s +40%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	112254 MB/s +31%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	95500 MB/s +12%
Media della classe Mini PC (3691 - 325960, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	88382 MB/s +3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	85572 MB/s

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	1233 MB/s +18%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1183 MB/s +13%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	1048 MB/s
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	1042 MB/s -1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	1029 MB/s -2%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	870 MB/s -17%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	757 MB/s -28%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	745 MB/s -29%
Media della classe Mini PC (74.9 - 2039, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	740 MB/s -29%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	14240 KRay/s +3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	13875 KRay/s
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	13617 KRay/s -2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9284 KRay/s -33%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	9270 KRay/s -33%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	7279 KRay/s -48%
Media della classe Mini PC (350 - 26952, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	6881 KRay/s -50%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6325 KRay/s -54%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5777 KRay/s -58%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	45560 MPixel/s +13%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	40655 MPixel/s +1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	40475 MPixel/s +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	40245 MPixel/s
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	33092 MPixel/s -18%
Media della classe Mini PC (4408 - 50500, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	28301 MPixel/s -30%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	26496 MPixel/s -34%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	24903 MPixel/s -38%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	24858 MPixel/s -38%

Cinebench R15 multi loop

L'Aoostar GEM12 si comporta in modo eccellente nel ciclo continuo di Cinebench R15. Non c'è da aspettarsi una perdita di prestazioni dovuta al carico continuo. In termini di consistenza, il nostro campione di prova insieme all' Acemagic AM18 in un duello all'altezza degli occhi. Il consumo massimo di energia di 65 watt viene raggiunto ad ogni ciclo, il che a sua volta indica un'unità di raffreddamento potente.

Metriche della CPU durante il ciclo di Cinebench R15

Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2530 (2503.13-2552.81)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2784 (2721.64-2831.86)

Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS: Ø2605 (2529.88-2677.73)

Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2759 (2690.7-2800.92)

Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø1545 (1395.97-2133.22)

Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø1981 (1895.47-2262.7)

Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2489 (2476.93-2539.84)

Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H: Ø1983 (1919.75-2106.82)

Prestazioni del sistema

Aoostar GEM12 offre valori solidi nelle misurazioni delle prestazioni di sistema, collocando il nostro campione di prova nella fascia media buona. Le prestazioni di tutti i dispositivi qui elencati sono più che adatte all'uso quotidiano; non noterà una differenza notevole nell'uso normale (ad esempio, la navigazione in Internet o il lavoro d'ufficio). I 32 GB di RAM installati sono una dimensione generosa, che favorirà notevolmente la sua esperienza di navigazione con numerose pagine web aperte simultaneamente.

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity

PCMark 10 / Score
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	7705 Points +4%
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	7651 Points +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	7510 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	7431 Points
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	7120 Points -4%
Aoostar GEM10, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	6749 Points -9%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	6435 Points -13%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	6295 Points -15%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	11591 Points +7%
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	11333 Points +5%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	11273 Points +4%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	11125 Points +3%
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	11097 Points +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	11030 Points +2%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10822 Points
Aoostar GEM10, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	10522 Points -3%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	11082 Points +6%
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	10970 Points +5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	10484 Points 0%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10482 Points
Aoostar GEM10, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	9367 Points -11%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	8901 Points -15%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	8114 Points -23%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	7924 Points -24%

CrossMark: Overall | Responsiveness | Creativity | Productivity

CrossMark / Overall
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	1986 Points +2%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1939 Points
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	1866 Points -4%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1860 Points -4%
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	1828 Points -6%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1802 Points -7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1675 Points -14%
Aoostar GEM10, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	1648 Points -15%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	2205 Points +19%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1919 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1849 Points
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1700 Points -8%
Aoostar GEM10, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	1566 Points -15%
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	1541 Points -17%
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	1494 Points -19%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1378 Points -25%

CrossMark / Creativity
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	2127 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2040 Points
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	2030 Points 0%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1929 Points -5%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	1907 Points -7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1883 Points -8%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1870 Points -8%
Aoostar GEM10, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	1696 Points -17%

CrossMark / Productivity
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	1996 Points +7%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1872 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1831 Points -2%
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	1764 Points -6%
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	1743 Points -7%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1717 Points -8%
Aoostar GEM10, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Radeon 680M, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	1629 Points -13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1589 Points -15%

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	71990 MB/s +6%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	68603 MB/s +1%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	68299 MB/s +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	67777 MB/s
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	62397 MB/s -8%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	50829 MB/s -25%
Media della classe Mini PC (6481 - 89287, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	48357 MB/s -29%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	45792 MB/s -32%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44442 MB/s -34%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	75449 MB/s +24%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	64323 MB/s +5%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	61710 MB/s +1%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	61463 MB/s +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	61006 MB/s
Media della classe Mini PC (6914 - 99171, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	49177 MB/s -19%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	48963 MB/s -20%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	47960 MB/s -21%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	43828 MB/s -28%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	86974 MB/s 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	86677 MB/s
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	86273 MB/s 0%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	70596 MB/s -19%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	65057 MB/s -25%
Media della classe Mini PC (6862 - 98583, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	52856 MB/s -39%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	51116 MB/s -41%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	47201 MB/s -46%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	45952 MB/s -47%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	149 ns * -68%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	146.1 ns * -65%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	104.1 ns * -17%
Media della classe Mini PC (44.9 - 184.8, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	92.1 ns * -4%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	91.2 ns * -3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	88.6 ns *
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	87.9 ns * +1%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	79.9 ns * +10%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	74.7 ns * +16%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Latenze DPC

I valori DPC documentati sono leggermente superiori per Aoostar GEM12. Uno sguardo alla panoramica di confronto mostra che alcuni dispositivi hanno fornito risultati significativamente peggiori. Tuttavia, abbiamo raggiunto il valore massimo solo poco dopo aver avviato la riproduzione del video di prova 4K. Ci sono anche alcune cadute di fotogrammi, ma non ostacolano la fruizione del filmato. Durante la riproduzione, il carico dell'iGPU raggiunge il 64%, un valore relativamente alto.

Latenza massima quando si aprono più schede del browser e si riproducono video 4K

Latenza massima dopo dieci secondi di Prime95

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2724 μs * -172%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2151 μs * -115%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	2097.9 μs * -109%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2069.2 μs * -107%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	1026 μs * -2%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1001.9 μs *
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	962.8 μs * +4%
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	900 μs * +10%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Memoria di massa

Aoostar GEM12 è dotato di un SSD da 1 TB di Crucial. Nel confronto, vediamo un risultato eccellente, con il quale il nostro dispositivo di prova può assicurarsi il primo posto. Aoostar installa un raffreddamento attivo nel GEM12, ma questo consiste in una sola ventola. Tuttavia, questa combinazione non è sufficiente per mantenere stabili le prestazioni sotto carico. Tuttavia, la perdita di prestazioni è molto lieve e difficilmente percepibile. Nel dispositivo è possibile installare due SSD NVMe con una lunghezza di 80 millimetri.

Per ulteriori confronti e benchmark, la invitiamo a consultare la nostra tabella di confronto.

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8

Sequential Read: 2984 MB/s

Sequential Write: 4487 MB/s

512K Read: 2076 MB/s

512K Write: 4270 MB/s

4K Read: 61.03 MB/s

4K Write: 131.2 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 574.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 335.5 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	90.9 pt
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	85.6 pt
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	71.7 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	66.6 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	59.6 pt
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	57.2 pt
Media della classe Mini PC	49.2 pt
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	46.7 pt
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	46 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	4000 (3961.36^min - 3999.66^max) MB/s +29%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	3114 (3080.09^min - 3114.48^max) MB/s 0%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3108 (3065.99^min - 3107.56^max) MB/s
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	2668 (2648.91^min - 2668.42^max) MB/s -14%
Media della classe Mini PC (277 - 4357, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	2333 MB/s -25%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2315 (2293.84^min - 2315.26^max) MB/s -26%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	2279 (2272.33^min - 2279.03^max) MB/s -27%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2178 (2158.39^min - 2177.68^max) MB/s -30%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1674 (1242.56^min - 1673.54^max) MB/s -46%
seq write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4619 (4584.79^min - 4619.39^max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	4553 (4417.86^min - 4552.92^max) MB/s -1%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	3866 (206.78^min - 3865.71^max) MB/s -16%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3386 (3076.94^min - 3385.64^max) MB/s -27%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	3271 (3235.73^min - 3270.93^max) MB/s -29%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	2629 (1414.22^min - 2628.56^max) MB/s -43%
Media della classe Mini PC (229 - 5595, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	2509 MB/s -46%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2341 (2252.02^min - 2341.4^max) MB/s -49%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1348 (1117.85^min - 1347.87^max) MB/s -71%
seq q8 t1 read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	5213 (4500.71^min - 5212.95^max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	4878 (4476.29^min - 4877.98^max) MB/s -6%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	4800 (4387.45^min - 4800.17^max) MB/s -8%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	4780 (4492.97^min - 4780.46^max) MB/s -8%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	4769 (3791.02^min - 4769.24^max) MB/s -9%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	4684 (4089.86^min - 4684.2^max) MB/s -10%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4676 (4310.07^min - 4675.81^max) MB/s -10%
Media della classe Mini PC (236 - 8430, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	3790 MB/s -27%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	3194 (2810.81^min - 3194.17^max) MB/s -39%
seq q8 t1 write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4754 (4738.27^min - 4754.03^max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	4505 (4403.81^min - 4505.09^max) MB/s -5%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	4081 (3987.52^min - 4081.49^max) MB/s -14%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	3901 (912.47^min - 3901.29^max) MB/s -18%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3729 (3700.15^min - 3728.95^max) MB/s -22%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	3255 (2485.13^min - 3254.57^max) MB/s -32%
Media della classe Mini PC (239 - 6669, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	2810 MB/s -41%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	2627 (2402.52^min - 2626.88^max) MB/s -45%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2212 (1222.43^min - 2212.27^max) MB/s -53%
4k q1 t1 read
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	80.9 (78.95^min - 80.85^max) MB/s +3%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	78.7 (78.09^min - 78.69^max) MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	64.1 (56.32^min - 64.06^max) MB/s -19%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	63.5 (59.81^min - 63.5^max) MB/s -19%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	61.7 (61.26^min - 61.71^max) MB/s -22%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	55.6 (53.92^min - 55.58^max) MB/s -29%
Media della classe Mini PC (6.85 - 86.6, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	55.3 MB/s -30%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	54.4 (52.17^min - 54.39^max) MB/s -31%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	47.3 (47.07^min - 47.31^max) MB/s -40%
4k q1 t1 write
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	422 (409.3^min - 421.98^max) MB/s +54%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	279 (237.61^min - 279.08^max) MB/s +2%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	274 (271.38^min - 273.89^max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	235 (230.8^min - 235.02^max) MB/s -14%
Media della classe Mini PC (30.4 - 435, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	196.9 MB/s -28%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	187.2 (181.54^min - 187.2^max) MB/s -32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	184.4 (177.6^min - 184.36^max) MB/s -33%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	169.3 (157.77^min - 169.29^max) MB/s -38%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	151.3 (148.71^min - 151.28^max) MB/s -45%
4k q32 t16 read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3197 (3174.44^min - 3196.85^max) MB/s
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	2967 (2962.7^min - 2967.4^max) MB/s -7%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	2004 (2002.37^min - 2004.23^max) MB/s -37%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1824 (1239.47^min - 1824.09^max) MB/s -43%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	1558 (1523.21^min - 1557.75^max) MB/s -51%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1452 (1402.67^min - 1451.9^max) MB/s -55%
Media della classe Mini PC (26.1 - 4158, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	1411 MB/s -56%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1143 (1091.01^min - 1142.98^max) MB/s -64%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	910 (889.36^min - 909.64^max) MB/s -72%
4k q32 t16 write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3639 (3534.46^min - 3639.09^max) MB/s
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	3364 (866.38^min - 3364.31^max) MB/s -8%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	2681 (2560.18^min - 2680.76^max) MB/s -26%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	1583 (825.5^min - 1583.41^max) MB/s -56%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1499 (1114.25^min - 1499.4^max) MB/s -59%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1434 (1410.26^min - 1433.71^max) MB/s -61%
Media della classe Mini PC (32.6 - 4288, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	1332 MB/s -63%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	600 (492.7^min - 600.03^max) MB/s -84%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	497 (467.49^min - 497.28^max) MB/s -86%

AS SSD
Score Total
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10021 Points
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	7931 Points -21%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	6147 Points -39%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	5975 Points -40%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	5132 Points -49%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4987 Points -50%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	4412 Points -56%
Media della classe Mini PC (211 - 10021, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	4244 Points -58%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	3435 Points -66%
Score Read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3741 Points
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	2899 Points -23%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2119 Points -43%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	2109 Points -44%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	1643 Points -56%
Media della classe Mini PC (76 - 3741, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	1578 Points -58%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1561 Points -58%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1482 Points -60%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	1248 Points -67%
Score Write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4371 Points
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	3564 Points -18%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	2964 Points -32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2807 Points -36%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2777 Points -36%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	2735 Points -37%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2082 Points -52%
Media della classe Mini PC (88 - 4371, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	1902 Points -56%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	1600 Points -63%
Seq Read
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	4349.85 MB/s +1%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4317 MB/s
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	4264 MB/s -1%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	4162 MB/s -4%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	3835 MB/s -11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3779 MB/s -12%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	3741 MB/s -13%
Media della classe Mini PC (291 - 6620, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	3231 MB/s -25%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	3010 MB/s -30%
Seq Write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4188 MB/s
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	3970 MB/s -5%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	3936.64 MB/s -6%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	3477 MB/s -17%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	2568 MB/s -39%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2369 MB/s -43%
Media della classe Mini PC (242 - 5783, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	2292 MB/s -45%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2285 MB/s -45%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	1897 MB/s -55%
4K Read
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	104.3 MB/s +17%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	89.3 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	80.89 MB/s -9%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	68.4 MB/s -23%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	63.3 MB/s -29%
Media della classe Mini PC (21.4 - 104.3, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	59.7 MB/s -33%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	52.4 MB/s -41%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	50.3 MB/s -44%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	41.8 MB/s -53%
4K Write
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	366 MB/s +66%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	316.33 MB/s +43%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	238 MB/s +8%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	221 MB/s
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	196.9 MB/s -11%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	196.5 MB/s -11%
Media della classe Mini PC (30.9 - 366, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	177.5 MB/s -20%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	171.7 MB/s -22%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	139.4 MB/s -37%
4K-64 Read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3220 MB/s
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	2379 MB/s -26%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	1614 MB/s -50%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1602.91 MB/s -50%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1218 MB/s -62%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	1218 MB/s -62%
Media della classe Mini PC (23.4 - 3220, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	1195 MB/s -63%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1041 MB/s -68%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	812 MB/s -75%
4K-64 Write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3731 MB/s
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	2850 MB/s -24%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	2374 MB/s -36%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	2370 MB/s -36%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2340 MB/s -37%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2066.57 MB/s -45%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1649 MB/s -56%
Media della classe Mini PC (32.8 - 3731, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	1495 MB/s -60%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	1204 MB/s -68%
Access Time Read
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	0.173 ms * -128%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	0.098 ms * -29%
Media della classe Mini PC (0.022 - 0.489, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	0.09579 ms * -26%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.076 ms *
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	0.069 ms * +9%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.067 ms * +12%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	0.049 ms * +36%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	0.046 ms * +39%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	0.044 ms * +42%
Access Time Write
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	0.126 ms * -641%
Media della classe Mini PC (0.014 - 0.765, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	0.1133 ms * -566%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	0.078 ms * -359%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	0.072 ms * -324%
Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	0.061 ms * -259%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	0.059 ms * -247%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	0.031 ms * -82%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.02 ms * -18%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.017 ms *

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Continuous load: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5121 (4152.57-5218.34)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4683 (3872.18-4767.25)

Geekom A8 Acer N5000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4786 (4324.07-4802.27)

Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1320 (771.89-3141.95)

Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1764 (1425.22-4795.56)

Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4764 (3862.99-4794.3)

Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4663 (3995.26-4684.2)

Aoostar GEM10 BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4833 (4418.07-4847.99)

Scheda grafica

L'uscita delle immagini è gestita dalla AMD Radeon 780M che abbiamo già testato diverse volte. In combinazione con il AMD Ryzen 7 8845HSè disponibile un massimo di 65 watt. Le prestazioni dell'iGPU sono buone e sono alla pari con i suoi rivali con lo stesso adattatore grafico. Il duello contro il Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti e il Acemagic F2Ache funzionano entrambi con l'Intel Arc 8, viene vinto dal nostro campione di prova con uno stretto margine. Coloro che utilizzano Aoostar GEM12 con AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX possono orientarsi verso Aoostar GEM10 in termini di prestazioni.

Per ulteriori confronti e benchmark, consulti la nostra tabella di confronto delle GPU Tabella di confronto delle GPU.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	96.8 pt
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	96.6 pt
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	94.3 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	93.6 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	92.1 pt
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	85.2 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	55.1 pt
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	55.1 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	13636 Points +2%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	13533 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	13410 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12085 Points -10%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11691 Points -13%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	11668 Points -13%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	6999 Points -48%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	6975 Points -48%

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3205 Points +13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3193 Points +12%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2912 Points +2%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2901 Points +2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2846 Points
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2518 Points -12%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	1583 Points -44%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	1581 Points -44%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	8354 Points +4%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	8327 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8007 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7710 Points -4%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	7653 Points -4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7599 Points -5%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	5421 Points -32%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	5407 Points -32%

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	37 fps +7%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	34.6 fps
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	34 fps -2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	31.6 fps -9%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	29.7 fps -14%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	27.3 fps -21%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	22.3 fps -36%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	21.8 fps -37%
Extreme Preset DX11
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	36.3 fps
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	35.3 fps -3%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	34.7 fps -4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	33.2 fps -9%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	32.8 fps -10%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	32.7 fps -10%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	23.2 fps -36%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	22.7 fps -37%

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	24.5 fps
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	24 fps -2%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	23.7 fps -3%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	19.1 fps -22%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	18.5 fps -24%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17.1 fps -30%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	13.7 fps -44%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	13.3 fps -46%
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	32.4 fps +54%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	25.5 fps +21%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	21 fps
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	20.8 fps -1%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	18.3 fps -13%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	15.2 fps -28%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	14.6 fps -30%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	13.9 fps -34%

Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12174 Points
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	11940 Points -2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	11903 Points -2%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	10702 Points -12%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10491 Points -14%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	10102 Points -17%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	6129 Points -50%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	5950 Points -51%
1920x1080 1080p High
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	3631 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	3592 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3391 Points -6%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	3387 Points -6%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	3380 Points -6%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3341 Points -7%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	2113 Points -41%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	2035 Points -43%
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1920 Points +11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1812 Points +4%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1777 Points +2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1737 Points
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1585 Points -9%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1424 Points -18%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	1060 Points -39%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	1042 Points -40%

ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	9863 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	9494 Points
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	8909 Points -6%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7480 Points -21%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	6763 Points -29%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	6270 Points -34%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	3390 Points -64%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	3382 Points -64%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	492 Points +2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	483 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	471 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	469 Points -3%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	427 Points -12%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	427 Points -12%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	231 Points -52%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	226 Points -53%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	492 Points +2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	486 Points +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	481 Points
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	468 Points -3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	462 Points -4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	422 Points -12%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	246 Points -49%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	239 Points -50%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2589 Points +5%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2477 Points
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2356 Points -5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1961 Points -21%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1900 Points -23%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1620 Points -35%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	860 Points -65%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	850 Points -66%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2651 Points +5%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2519 Points
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2345 Points -7%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1812 Points -28%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1594 Points -37%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1274 Points -49%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	872 Points -65%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	866 Points -66%
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	3667 Points +4%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	3535 Points
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	3225 Points -9%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3076 Points -13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2444 Points -31%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2157 Points -39%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	1201 Points -66%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	1182 Points -67%

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1173 Samples/s +46%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	808 Samples/s +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	801 Samples/s
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	640 Samples/s -20%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	577 Samples/s -28%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	567 Samples/s -29%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	549 Samples/s -31%
Sala GPUs-only
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2732 Samples/s +83%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	2349 Samples/s +57%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2319 Samples/s +55%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1512 Samples/s +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1496 Samples/s
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1288 Samples/s -14%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	991 Samples/s -34%

Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5308 Points +211%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	4928 Points +188%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	4215 Points +147%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	3830 Points +124%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2339 Points +37%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1709 Points
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1512 Points -12%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1371 Points -20%

Photoshop PugetBench - GPU Score
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	114.5 Points +11%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	113 Points +9%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	103.4 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	98 Points -5%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	95.7 Points -7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	92.3 Points -11%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	90.6 Points -12%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	79.4 Points -23%

Premiere Pro PugetBench - GPU 0.9
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.8 Points +47%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	11.4 Points
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	11.2 Points -2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	10.1 Points -11%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	8.2 Points -28%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	7.6 Points -33%
Aoostar GEM10 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	7 Points -39%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	6.8 Points -40%

	Aoostar GEM12, AMD Radeon 780M R7 8845HS	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 9 185H	Geekom A8, AMD Radeon 780M R9 8945HS	Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 7 155H	Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900H	Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900HK	Acemagic AM18, AMD Radeon 780M R7 7840HS	Aoostar GEM10, AMD Radeon 680M R7 6800H	Media della classe Mini PC
SPECviewperf 12		-52%	-1%	-53%	-60%	-60%	6%	38%	-21%
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)	85.7	49.7 -42%	87.4 2%	49.8 -42%	40.1 -53%	40.2 -53%	83.7 -2%	90.8 6%	75.4 ?(13.6 - 295, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) -12%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)	86.6	51.3 -41%	86.4 0%	48.2 -44%	37.1 -57%	35.9 -59%	88.5 2%	91.2 5%	64.2 ?(10.9 - 251, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) -26%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)	53.3	22.7 -57%	55.1 3%	23.1 -57%	26.9 -50%	27.7 -48%	56.3 6%	56.7 6%	37 ?(4.03 - 117, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) -31%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)	18.4	0.67 -96%	19 3%	0.91 -95%	0.4 -98%	0.4 -98%	21.3 16%	70.6 284%	13.3 ?(0.15 - 80.4, n=57, ultimi 2 anni) -28%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)	67.3	58 -14%	75 11%	54.9 -18%	38.3 -43%	39.8 -41%	71.5 6%	75.7 12%	64 ?(11.4 - 226, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) -5%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)	51.4	15.9 -69%	47.7 -7%	16.9 -67%	11.8 -77%	12.2 -76%	60.5 18%	49.3 -4%	28.5 ?(2.53 - 136, n=60, ultimi 2 anni) -45%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)	30.3	19.9 -34%	25.8 -15%	18.2 -40%	16.6 -45%	17.4 -43%	30 -1%	28.2 -7%	35.3 ?(5.71 - 133, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) 17%
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)	114	43 -62%	106 -7%	42.7 -63%	45.3 -60%	47.3 -59%	116 2%	120 5%	72.4 ?(20.9 - 243, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) -36%
SPECviewperf 13		-53%	-3%	-53%	-59%	-59%	4%	-15%	-18%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)	82.4	48.5 -41%	85.8 4%	46.4 -44%	40.1 -51%	39.9 -52%	83.1 1%	63.5 -23%	74.8 ?(13.4 - 294, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) -9%
Catia (catia-05)	124	76.8 -38%	126 2%	71.6 -42%	51.3 -59%	51.6 -58%	129 4%	93.8 -24%	91.4 ?(15.6 - 381, n=62, ultimi 2 anni) -26%
Creo (creo-02)	90.7	29.3 -68%	92.8 2%	29.6 -67%	41.1 -55%	40.2 -56%	92 1%	64.8 -29%	73 ?(11.6 - 275, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) -20%
Energy (energy-02)	22.2	5.27 -76%	22.6 2%	5.69 -74%	4.5 -80%	4.39 -80%	24.1 9%	14.1 -36%	17.7 ?(0.92 - 310, n=60, ultimi 2 anni) -20%
Maya (maya-05)	109	62.5 -43%	103 -6%	59.5 -45%	47.5 -56%	48.3 -56%	108 -1%	113 4%	97.5 ?(15.9 - 340, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) -11%
Medical (medical-02)	70.5	25 -65%	69.2 -2%	29.7 -58%	14.4 -80%	14.4 -80%	79 12%	61.8 -12%	37.6 ?(2.28 - 198, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) -47%
Showcase (showcase-02)	29.9	19.9 -33%	24.2 -19%	18.2 -39%	17.3 -42%	17.3 -42%	29.9 0%	27.5 -8%	35 ?(5.69 - 133, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) 17%
Solidworks (sw-04)	104	45.6 -56%	97.3 -6%	44.8 -57%	57.1 -45%	57.4 -45%	107 3%	111 7%	76.6 ?(27.4 - 223, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) -26%
SPECviewperf 2020		-52%	11%	-56%	-67%	-66%	-3%	-9%	-16%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)	11.2	4.23 -62%	10.9 -3%	5.05 -55%	3.49 -69%	3.48 -69%	13 16%	10.7 -4%	7.85 ?(0.78 - 30.8, n=66, ultimi 2 anni) -30%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)	19.9	6.03 -70%	31 56%	4.61 -77%	3.05 -85%	3 -85%	14.2 -29%	10.6 -47%	11.3 ?(0.52 - 47.9, n=66, ultimi 2 anni) -43%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)	33.4	18.5 -45%	35.6 7%	17.9 -46%	14.8 -56%	15.1 -55%	31.2 -7%	32 -4%	30.7 ?(7.73 - 97.5, n=66, ultimi 2 anni) -8%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)	23.2	11.1 -52%	24.6 6%	10 -57%	7.78 -66%	8.08 -65%	24.7 6%	22.8 -2%	18.6 ?(4.61 - 64.1, n=65, ultimi 2 anni) -20%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)	20.4	14.9 -27%	21 3%	12.9 -37%	9.69 -52%	9.78 -52%	20.7 1%	18.9 -7%	22.5 ?(5.53 - 87.5, n=66, ultimi 2 anni) 10%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)	64.1	6.24 -90%	65.9 3%	5.7 -91%	6.29 -90%	6.67 -90%	61.1 -5%	61.4 -4%	37.2 ?(2.25 - 224, n=64, ultimi 2 anni) -42%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)	47.7	37.7 -21%	50.1 5%	35.4 -26%	23.9 -50%	24.4 -49%	46.7 -2%	49.7 4%	58.9 ?(12.2 - 223, n=66, ultimi 2 anni) 23%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)		-52% / -52%	2% / 2%	-54% / -54%	-62% / -62%	-62% / -61%	2% / 2%	5% / 5%	-18% / -18%

3DMark 05 Standard		55130 punti
3DMark 06 Standard Score		45449 punti
3DMark Vantage P Result		44358 punti
3DMark 11 Performance		13249 punti
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		162597 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		35738 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score		7353 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		3940 punti
3DMark Time Spy Score		3199 punti
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		502 punti
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		2806 punti
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score		2827 punti
Aiuto

... in confronto

Prestazioni di gioco

Aoostar GEM12 offre AMD Radeon 780M - una iGPU molto potente. Questa offre buone prestazioni 3D, sufficienti per giocare ad alcuni giochi. Tuttavia, a volte è necessario accettare le limitazioni in termini di qualità dei dettagli, se si vogliono ottenere buoni frame rate giocabili.

Per una panoramica dettagliata delle prestazioni dell'iGPU rispetto ad altre schede grafiche, consulti il nostro Elenco dei giochi GPU.

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	153.5 (7.45^min, 37.4^P0.1, 101.7^P1) fps +4%
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	148.9 (7.41^min, 12.7^P0.1, 96.9^P1) fps +1%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	147.5 (7.32^min, 34.2^P0.1, 83.2^P1) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	140.2 (26.9^min, 57.9^P0.1, 101.9^P1) fps -5%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	126 (36.4^min, 62.1^P0.1, 99.1^P1) fps -15%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	119.6 (6.3^min, 25^P0.1, 75.7^P1) fps -19%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	98.1 (22.4^min, 35.3^P0.1, 58.9^P1) fps -33%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	87.7 (4.87^min, 27.9^P0.1, 53^P1) fps -41%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	49.3 (25.6^min, 36.7^P0.1, 40.9^P1) fps 0%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	49.1 (14.6^min, 36.4^P0.1, 40.8^P1) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	46.8 (28.7^min, 32.6^P0.1, 37.1^P1) fps -5%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	46.2 (14.1^min, 14.7^P0.1, 16^P1) fps -6%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	44.8 (26.8^min, 32^P0.1, 37.7^P1) fps -9%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	41.7 (8.33^min, 17.3^P0.1, 31.2^P1) fps -15%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	32.2 (15.4^min, 16^P0.1, 18.1^P1) fps -34%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	31.4 (16^min, 16.2^P0.1, 17.4^P1) fps -36%

Borderlands 3
1280x720 Very Low Overall Quality (DX11)
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	102.5 fps +2%
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	101.9 fps +2%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	100.3 fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	93 fps -7%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	83.6 fps -17%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	68.5 fps -32%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	57.2 fps -43%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	49.2 fps -51%
1920x1080 High Overall Quality (DX11)
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	32.7 fps +3%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	31.7 fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	28.7 fps -9%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	27.8 fps -12%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	27.7 fps -13%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	26.4 fps -17%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	16.1 fps -49%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	14.9 fps -53%

GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	166.9 (5.05^min, 125^P1) fps +1%
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	165.1 (4.54^min, 100^P1) fps 0%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	165.1 (4.83^min, 125^P1) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	163.6 (4.63^min, 111.1^P1) fps -1%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	161 (4.76^min, 100^P1) fps -2%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	145.3 (5.31^min, 100^P1) fps -12%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	120.8 (22.9^min, 83.3^P1) fps -27%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	66.7 (4.68^min, 45.5^P1) fps +2%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	65.3 (4.57^min, 45.5^P1) fps
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	64.7 (4.56^min, 31.3^P1) fps -1%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	53.9 (3.82^min, 38.5^P1) fps -17%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	41.2 (3.12^min, 30.3^P1) fps -37%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	31.3 (2.94^min, 22.7^P1) fps -52%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	20.3 (10.5^min, 16.1^P1) fps -69%

Far Cry 5
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	88 (77^min) fps +5%
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	84 (74^min) fps 0%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	84 (73^min) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	79 (39^min) fps -6%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	72 (63^min) fps -14%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	69 (25^min) fps -18%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	50 (45^min) fps -40%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	46 (41^min) fps +2%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	45 (39^min) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	42 (34^min) fps -7%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	42 (33^min) fps -7%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	38 (31^min) fps -16%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	37 (30^min) fps -18%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	23 (21^min) fps -49%

Far Cry New Dawn
1280x720 Low Preset
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	76 (58^min) fps +6%
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	74 (48^min) fps +3%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	72 (54^min) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	69 (2^min) fps -4%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	65 (11^min) fps -10%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	62 (50^min) fps -14%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	47 (31^min) fps -35%
1920x1080 High Preset
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	44 (35^min) fps +7%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	44 (37^min) fps +7%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	41 (32^min) fps
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	40 (33^min) fps -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	39 (25^min) fps -5%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	37 (25^min) fps -10%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	24 (18^min) fps -41%

Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	163.1 (143^min) fps +7%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	159.7 (142.1^min) fps +5%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	152.7 (134.2^min) fps
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	124 (8.9^min) fps -19%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	119.5 (88.5^min) fps -22%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	106.5 (61^min) fps -30%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	106.3 (81.7^min) fps -30%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	103.2 (59.8^min) fps -32%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	88.3 (74.1^min) fps +2%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	86.6 (72.2^min) fps
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	82.9 (69.1^min) fps -4%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	81.6 (72.3^min) fps -6%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	79 (48.2^min) fps -9%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	77.3 (52.5^min) fps -11%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	67 (60.7^min) fps -23%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	61.3 (54.1^min) fps -29%

F1 2020
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	197.3 (171^min) fps +7%
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	194.4 (178^min) fps +5%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	184.7 (163^min) fps
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	164 (150^min) fps -11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	139.1 (126^min) fps -25%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	88.7 (79^min) fps -52%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	84.5 (74^min) fps -54%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	79.5 (67^min) fps +8%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	76.4 (67^min) fps +4%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	73.6 (62^min) fps
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	64.5 (51^min) fps -12%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	60.5 (51^min) fps -18%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	35.6 (30^min) fps -52%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	34.2 (29^min) fps -54%

GRID Legends
1280x720 Low Preset
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	141.4 (2.69^min) fps +4%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	136.2 (6.48^min) fps
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	136.1 (8.29^min) fps 0%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	116.5 (34.8^min) fps -14%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	86.6 (7.26^min) fps -36%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	80 (35^min) fps -41%
1920x1080 High Preset
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	62.5 (1.931^min) fps 0%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	62.3 (30.5^min) fps
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	56.4 (21.6^min) fps -9%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	53.3 (24.4^min) fps -14%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	44.8 (29.3^min) fps -28%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	41.7 (24^min) fps -33%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1280x720 Lowest Preset
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	131.4 fps +27%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	103.8 fps
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	101.2 fps -3%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	91.3 fps -12%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	79.3 fps -24%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	65.9 fps -37%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	39.6 fps -62%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	49.5 fps +25%
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	40.3 fps +2%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	39.5 fps
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	36.9 fps -7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	35.8 fps -9%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	23.4 fps -41%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	18.8 fps -52%

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	45.4 (38.4^min) fps +7%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	44 (37.6^min) fps +4%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	42.4 (35.7^min) fps
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	34.8 (29.9^min) fps -18%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	34.3 (29.1^min) fps -19%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	29.5 (24.1^min) fps -30%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	18.2 (14.1^min) fps -57%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	16.4 (13.6^min) fps -61%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	27.8 (23.7^min) fps +6%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	26.3 (22.2^min) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	24 (20.6^min) fps -9%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	22.4 (15.6^min) fps -15%
Aoostar GEM10 Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB	21.3 (18.4^min) fps -19%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	20.4 (13.8^min) fps -22%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	12.2 (10.3^min) fps -54%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	11.5 (10^min) fps -56%

Cyberpunk 2077 FPS chart

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M: Ø21.7 (20.1-23.3)

Aoostar GEM10 R7 6800H, Radeon 680M: Ø17 (13-17.6)

	basso	medio	alto	ultra
GTA V (2015)	165.1	154.8	65.3	26.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)	147.5	95.3	49.1	31.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	152.7	123.3	86.6	80.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	77.9	38.3	28.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	62.6	44.9	38.1
Far Cry 5 (2018)	84	48	45	42
Strange Brigade (2018)	166.8	68	57.3	49.3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	103.8	43.3	39.5	33.9
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	72	43	41	38
Metro Exodus (2019)	86.9	37	27.9	23
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)	145.3	60.6	60.6	51.2
Borderlands 3 (2019)	100.3	48.6	31.7	25.3
F1 2020 (2020)	184.7	94.7	73.6	52.4
F1 2021 (2021)	207	105.5	79.9	34.6
God of War (2022)	42.3	34.1	27.2	18.3
GRID Legends (2022)	105.7	82.3	62.3	49.4
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	65.8	49.1	34.5	28.1
F1 22 (2022)	94.9	82.7	61.5	17.6
F1 23 (2023)	89.8	79	57.8	13.9
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	38.6	30	24.7	24.6
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	42.4	32.9	26.3	23.3
Total War Pharaoh (2023)	89.9	75.6	61	55.2
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024)		173.5	134.9	128.9

Aoostar GEM12 con l'eGPU GPD G1 nella verifica delle prestazioni

Aoostar installa un'interfaccia OCuLink nel GEM12, disponibile principalmente per l'utilizzo di schede grafiche esterne. È disponibile anche l'interfaccia USB4, anche se la larghezza di banda della connessione OCuLink è migliore e consente circa il 10% in più di prestazioni 3D. Una volta abbiamo testato le prestazioni in combinazione con il GPD G1 (AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT) e abbiamo eseguito alcuni benchmark sintetici e di gioco.

Le prestazioni in combinazione con l'eGPU GPD G1 sono migliori di tutti gli altri dispositivi che abbiamo testato finora in questa combinazione. La differenza di prestazioni rispetto a Aoostar GEM10 o a Minisforum AtomMan x7 Ti è trascurabile. Molti giochi possono ora essere goduti in alta qualità.

Performance Rating - Percent
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	99.4 pt
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	98.7 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	96.6 pt
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	88.7 pt
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	83.6 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	42102 Points +214%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	41824 Points +212%
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	41706 Points +211%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	33843 Points +152%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	27060 Points +102%
	13410 Points

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	10237 Points +260%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	10204 Points +259%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	10195 Points +258%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	9734 Points +242%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9555 Points +236%
	2846 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	29444 Points +268%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	29101 Points +263%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	29080 Points +263%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	29015 Points +262%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	28653 Points +258%
	8007 Points
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	6805 Points +218%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	6784 Points +217%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6754 Points +216%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	6738 Points +215%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6704 Points +214%
	2138 Points

Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	27759 Points +128%
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	24191 Points +99%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	19596 Points +61%
	12174 Points
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6849 Points -44%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5014 Points -59%
1920x1080 1080p High
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	12860 Points +258%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12816 Points +257%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	12194 Points +239%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7660 Points +113%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5621 Points +56%
	3592 Points
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5858 Points +237%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	5829 Points +236%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5799 Points +234%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	5328 Points +207%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	4275 Points +146%
	1737 Points
3840x2160 4k Optimized
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	7197 Points
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	7139 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7049 Points
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6043 Points
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	4765 Points
7680x4320 8k Optimized
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2778 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2777 Points
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2770 Points
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2765 Points
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2764 Points

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	99 fps +304%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	98.8 fps +303%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	98.5 fps +302%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	96.5 fps +294%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	91.6 fps +274%
	24.5 fps
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	89.9 fps +328%
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	89.4 fps +326%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	88.5 fps +321%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	81 fps +286%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	79.1 fps +277%
	21 fps

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	136.2 fps +294%
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	135.3 fps +291%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	132.3 fps +282%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	121.7 fps +252%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	118.1 fps +241%
	34.6 fps
Extreme Preset DX11
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	134.9 fps +272%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	134.7 fps +271%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	130.8 fps +260%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	129.7 fps +257%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	123.2 fps +239%
	36.3 fps

ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	20937 Points +121%
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	20653 Points +118%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	20490 Points +116%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	20386 Points +115%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	20340 Points +114%
	9494 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1765 Points +265%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1729 Points +258%
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1726 Points +257%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1703 Points +253%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1701 Points +252%
	483 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1797 Points +274%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1772 Points +268%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1754 Points +265%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1748 Points +263%
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1735 Points +261%
	481 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	4583 Points +85%
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	4580 Points +85%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	4512 Points +82%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	4450 Points +80%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	4300 Points +74%
	2477 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	5543 Points +120%
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5421 Points +115%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	5375 Points +113%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5373 Points +113%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5356 Points +113%
	2519 Points
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	7310 Points +107%
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	7190 Points +103%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7145 Points +102%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7122 Points +101%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	7114 Points +101%
	3535 Points

Premiere Pro PugetBench - GPU 0.9
Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	36.1 Points +217%
Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	35.2 Points +209%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	34.1 Points +199%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	30.9 Points +171%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	26.9 Points +136%
	11.4 Points

	basso	medio	alto	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	180.9	175.9	166.8	97.6	70.3	76.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)	372	304	195.1	111.9	78.2	55
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	163.7	149.3	148.6	136.2		98.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	216	136.4	97.6		69.3	37.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	111.8	89.5	71.1			51.8
Far Cry 5 (2018)	134	121	116	108	101	52
Strange Brigade (2018)	455	264	218	186.7	123.1	65.6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	185.1	153.5	148	126.2	76.5	35.7
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	117	106	103	93	91	58
Metro Exodus (2019)	180.3	114.7	99.9	78.3	60.9	36.1
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)	288.9	173.6	123.1	85	50.7	21.3
Borderlands 3 (2019)	126.1	112.3	99.1	83.7	59.9	31.9
F1 2020 (2020)	307	258	223	153.3	114.2	64.6
F1 2021 (2021)	359	325	252	106.8	71.8	11.7
Far Cry 6 (2021)	125.7	114	105.2	99	70.1
God of War (2022)	120.2	119	99.6	69.3	53.9	34.5
GRID Legends (2022)	158.9	142.7	131.3	120.5	106.3	62.4
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	228	181.8	118.2	90.8	61	16.6
F1 22 (2022)	259	253	212	56.5	31.9	8.2
F1 23 (2023)	256	263	200	14.5	11.3
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	140.2	107.8	92.3	89	62.2	31.3
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	139	107.5	90.3	80.6	49.1	20.2
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023)	132	118	101	71	46	29
Total War Pharaoh (2023)	297.3	200.5	132.2	106.8	72.9	35.6
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023)	60	53	46	39	27	8
Skull & Bones (2024)	128	114	91	86	47	24

	Aoostar GEM12, AMD Radeon 780M R7 8845HS	Aoostar GEM12 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) , R7 8845HS	Aoostar GEM10 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) , R7 6800H	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) , Ultra 9 185H	Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4), R9 8945HS	Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) , AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT R7 7735HS
SPECviewperf 12		150%	144%	151%	146%	98%
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)	85.7	246 187%	241 181%	226 164%	123 44%	105 23%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)	86.6	244 182%	240 177%	234 170%	187 116%	176 103%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)	53.3	101 89%	96.2 80%	96.5 81%	84.1 58%	73.1 37%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)	18.4	36.1 96%	36.5 98%	36.4 98%	72 291%	24.2 32%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)	67.3	214 218%	196 191%	187 178%	171 154%	160 138%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)	51.4	122 137%	124 141%	121 135%	123 139%	107 108%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)	30.3	87.6 189%	90.9 200%	122 303%	119 293%	118 289%
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)	114	228 100%	210 84%	208 82%	193 69%	175 54%
SPECviewperf 13		187%	179%	193%	150%	138%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)	82.4	244 196%	240 191%	223 171%	123 49%	104 26%
Catia (catia-05)	124	366 195%	361 191%	355 186%	291 135%	273 120%
Creo (creo-02)	90.7	270 198%	268 195%	268 195%	190 109%	175 93%
Energy (energy-02)	22.2	73.5 231%	71.8 223%	73.6 232%	73.4 231%	71.6 223%
Maya (maya-05)	109	328 201%	323 196%	326 199%	278 155%	270 148%
Medical (medical-02)	70.5	197 179%	176 150%	182 158%	170 141%	163 131%
Showcase (showcase-02)	29.9	87.8 194%	90.2 202%	122 308%	119 298%	118 295%
Solidworks (sw-04)	104	210 102%	192 85%	201 93%	192 85%	176 69%
SPECviewperf 2020		191%	174%	183%	172%	167%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)	11.2	24.4 118%	23.6 111%	22.6 102%	26.8 139%	27.8 148%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)	19.9	56.8 185%	37.1 86%	57.1 187%	89.9 352%	87.7 341%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)	33.4	92.9 178%	90.8 172%	87.4 162%	63.1 89%	57 71%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)	23.2	63.8 175%	63.2 172%	61.6 166%	58.7 153%	57.4 147%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)	20.4	60.5 197%	60.1 195%	56.8 178%	33.7 65%	33.1 62%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)	64.1	214 234%	214 234%	218 240%	201 214%	207 223%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)	47.7	166 248%	165 246%	164 244%	139 191%	131 175%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)		176% / 175%	166% / 165%	176% / 175%	156% / 155%	134% / 133%

Emissioni - AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ben raffreddato

Emissioni di rumore

Sebbene Aoostar abbia installato due ventole nel GEM12, il dispositivo è significativamente più silenzioso di tutti gli altri dispositivi di questa recensione. In modalità idle, abbiamo misurato un livello di pressione sonora di soli 27,6 dB(A). Sotto carico medio, Aoostar GEM12 raggiunge 36 dB(A) ed è silenziosamente udibile. Abbiamo poi raggiunto il volume massimo nello stress test, a poco più di 38 dB(A). Va sottolineato positivamente il piacevole rumore della ventola, che non tende ad essere fastidioso grazie alla sua bassa frequenza.

Rumorosità

Idle		27.5 / 27.6 / 27.6 dB(A)
Sotto carico		36 / 38.2 dB(A)

	30 dB silenzioso 40 dB(A) udibile 50 dB(A) rumoroso
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm di distanza) Rumorosità ambientale: 24.3 dB(A)

	Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	Aoostar GEM10 R7 6800H, Radeon 680M
Noise		-8%	-9%	-10%	-10%	-13%	-13%	-19%
off /ambiente *	24.3	24.1 1%	24.4 -0%	24.9 -2%	25.4 -5%	25.4 -5%	24.8 -2%	24.3 -0%
Idle Minimum *	27.5	29.8 -8%	24.5 11%	25.4 8%	28 -2%	27.5 -0%	31 -13%	36.5 -33%
Idle Average *	27.6	29.9 -8%	24.7 11%	25.7 7%	28.1 -2%	28 -1%	31.2 -13%	36.6 -33%
Idle Maximum *	27.6	30 -9%	24.7 11%	25.7 7%	28.5 -3%	33 -20%	31.4 -14%	36.6 -33%
Load Average *	36	37.3 -4%	48.5 -35%	47.8 -33%	39.6 -10%	42.8 -19%	37.1 -3%	41.7 -16%
Witcher 3 ultra *	35.4	40.2 -14%	47 -33%	45.23 -28%	47.2 -33%	44.5 -26%	37.6 -6%	40.18 -14%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	35.4							40.3 -14%
Load Maximum *	38.2	43.5 -14%	49.2 -29%	49 -28%	44.2 -16%	44.9 -18%	53.7 -41%	40.8 -7%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Temperatura

L'involucro metallico distribuisce abbastanza bene il calore risultante. Documentiamo un'area sulla parte superiore come il punto più caldo, dove misuriamo circa 46 °C sulla superficie. I componenti sono ventilati dall'alto e dal basso. Due ventole lavorano qui per aspirare aria fresca. Tuttavia, la ventola inferiore fornisce aria fresca solo alla memoria di massa e alla RAM, mentre la ventola installata sulla parte superiore raffredda il processore. Questo concetto di raffreddamento funziona e, con un massimo di 84,4 °C, non c'è nulla da criticare in termini di temperatura. I limiti di prestazioni predefiniti sono stati raggiunti; le prestazioni complete del processore AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS può essere mantenuta in modo permanente anche durante lo stress test.

Aoostar GEM12 durante lo stress test (lato superiore)

Aoostar GEM12 durante lo stress test (lato inferiore)

Aoostar GEM12 durante lo stress test (retro)

Carico massimo

Idle

Cyberpunk


45.2 °C	46 °C	41.7 °C
37.4 °C	27.3 °C	29.2 °C
35.4 °C	33.7 °C	33.5 °C

Massima: 46 °C
Media: 36.6 °C


34.6 °C	31.3 °C	33.2 °C
28.7 °C	24.2 °C	29.2 °C
27.5 °C	27.4 °C	29.2 °C

Massima: 34.6 °C
Media: 29.5 °C

Alimentazione (max) 47.1 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)

Carico massimo

Idle

Cyberpunk


30.3 °C	30.1 °C	29.7 °C
30.1 °C	28.3 °C	28.5 °C
29.2 °C	28.7 °C	29 °C

Massima: 30.3 °C
Media: 29.3 °C


29.6 °C	29.2 °C	29.2 °C
29.1 °C	27.8 °C	28.5 °C
29 °C	28.5 °C	28.5 °C

Massima: 29.6 °C
Media: 28.8 °C

Alimentazione (max) 35.2 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)

Carico massimo

Idle

Cyberpunk


43.3 °C	44.9 °C	41.2 °C
35.8 °C	27 °C	30.8 °C
33.2 °C	33.1 °C	35.2 °C

Massima: 44.9 °C
Media: 36.1 °C


35.4 °C	31.1 °C	32.3 °C
30.3 °C	25.5 °C	30.2 °C
29.1 °C	28.4 °C	29.5 °C

Massima: 35.4 °C
Media: 30.2 °C

Alimentazione (max) 41.9 °C | Temperatura della stanza 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)

(±) La temperatura media del lato superiore sotto carico massimo e' di 36.6 °C / 98 F, rispetto alla media di 32.3 °C / 90 F per i dispositivi di questa classe Mini PC.
(-) La temperatura massima sul lato superiore è di 46 °C / 115 F, rispetto alla media di 35.8 °C / 96 F, che varia da 24 a 69.5 °C per questa classe Mini PC.
(+) Il lato inferiore si riscalda fino ad un massimo di 34.6 °C / 94 F, rispetto alla media di 36.1 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle, la temperatura media del lato superiore è di 29.3 °C / 85 F, rispetto alla media deld ispositivo di 32.3 °C / 90 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the class Mini PC.

Gestione dell'energia

Purtroppo, Aoostar GEM12 non vince la corona dell'efficienza. Mentre i requisiti energetici in modalità idle sono ancora ragionevoli, da 8 a 14,6 watt, aumentano notevolmente sotto carico. Con 73,9 watt, il nostro campione di prova richiede una quantità di energia significativamente maggiore rispetto al Minisforum AtomMan X7 Tiche è alla pari in termini di prestazioni. A breve termine, l'alimentatore da 120 watt deve essere in grado di fornire fino a 95 watt, il che non causa problemi nella pratica.

Aoostar GEM10 con alimentatore (19 V; 6,32 A)

Consumo di corrente

Off / Standby	1.7 / 2.4 Watt
Idle	8.2 / 10 / 14.6 Watt
Sotto carico	73.9 / 95.3 Watt


Leggenda: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	Aoostar GEM10 R7 6800H, Radeon 680M	Media AMD Radeon 780M	Media della classe Mini PC
Power Consumption		1%	34%	-1%	12%	-20%	-10%	14%	23%	-5%
Idle Minimum *	8.2	8.2 -0%	3.2 61%	9.1 -11%	5.7 30%	12.1 -48%	9.8 -20%	7.3 11%	6.11 ?(2.7 - 14, n=51) 25%	9.69 ?(1.9 - 45.7, n=121, ultimi 2 anni) -18%
Idle Average *	10	12.1 -21%	4.9 51%	10.3 -3%	9.5 5%	13.2 -32%	11.5 -15%	8.7 13%	8.32 ?(4.7 - 17.6, n=51) 17%	11.9 ?(1.9 - 47.5, n=119, ultimi 2 anni) -19%
Idle Maximum *	14.6	14 4%	6.8 53%	14.4 1%	16.5 -13%	14.1 3%	15.3 -5%	10.4 29%	10.6 ?(5.2 - 27, n=51) 27%	15.2 ?(2.6 - 57.1, n=121, ultimi 2 anni) -4%
Load Average *	73.9	53.1 28%	71.3 4%	54.9 26%	53.3 28%	82.9 -12%	75.3 -2%	67.2 9%	56.1 ?(19.7 - 93.2, n=50) 24%	59 ?(11.3 - 170.6, n=121, ultimi 2 anni) 20%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	79.9							58.8 26%
Load Maximum *	95.3	100.4 -5%	93.2 2%	110.4 -16%	87.8 8%	106.8 -12%	102.8 -8%	101.6 -7%	74.9 ?(34.9 - 111.8, n=51) 21%	100.5 ?(18.1 - 423, n=121, ultimi 2 anni) -5%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Power consumption with the external monitor

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10 (9.28-14.3)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø12.2 (10.9-14.1)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.93 (3.89-6.83)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10.4 (9.08-14.4)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø79.6 (76-85.2)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø43.8 (42.6-45.7)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø67.5 (54.1-87.8)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø48.4 (45.6-52.4)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø84.4 (83.6-85.1)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø91.8 (87.6-95.4)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø69.9 (55.2-93.2)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø92.2 (78.7-114)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø73.9 (55.4-87)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø53.1 (49.6-57.6)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø71.3 (62.5-83.3)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø54.9 (50.2-57)

Power consumption with the external monitor

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø83.6 (80.7-95.3)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø98.1 (94.2-100.4)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø72.5 (69.7-93.2)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø99.6 (92-110.4)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø82.1 (74.2-89.2)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø88 (87.7-88.3)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø73.7 (64.4-85.7)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103 (99.2-107)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø34 (31.1-57.1)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø33.3 (28.9-63)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø29.6 (24.6-64.4)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø32.7 (19.4-55.3)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø75.3 (72.3-87.5)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø87.7 (87.3-88.3)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø66.8 (64.3-85.9)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø100.7 (97.2-108.6)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø83.1 (79.2-88.5)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø50.3 (47.7-65.3)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø71.9 (63.7-91)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø49.7 (47.3-60.6)

Pro

+ robusto alloggiamento in alluminio

+ lavorazione perfetta

+ moderno AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

+ potente iGPU (AMD Radeon 780M)

+ è possibile installare due SSD NVMe (M.2-2280)

+ radiatore attivo per SSD

+ USB4 e OCuLink

+ doppio RJ45 (2.5G)

+ temperature del case sempre basse

+ potente unità di raffreddamento

+ relativamente silenzioso

+ prezzo ragionevole

Contro

- posizione poco pratica delle porte USB4 e OCuLink

- Prestazioni WLAN inferiori alla media

- nessun Wi-Fi 6E

- solo due porte USB 3.2 Type-A

Verdetto - Aoostar GEM12 con prezzo equo

L'Aoostar GEM12 in recensione: fornito da Aoostar

Aoostar GEM12 è ideale in combinazione con il AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ed è un mini-PC potente e ricco di prestazioni. Insieme a 32 GB di RAM e 1 TB di spazio di archiviazione, il computer compatto è ideale per molte attività. In termini di prestazioni relative, tuttavia, Aoostar GEM12 non può distinguersi dai suoi concorrenti, che offrono anch'essi prestazioni altrettanto buone. Dal punto di vista visivo, Aoostar ha rinunciato a qualsiasi espediente sul nostro dispositivo di prova. Se apprezza ancora questi piccoli dettagli, può dare un'occhiata al modello Pro della serie, che è dotato di un piccolo schermo sulla parte superiore. Tuttavia, non ne vediamo la necessità.

Aoostar GEM12 offre prestazioni impressionanti con AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS. Un'interfaccia moderna e un case di alta qualità con un raffreddamento potente sono un buon punto di vendita, che va di pari passo con un prezzo equo.

Il case di Aoostar GEM12 è perfettamente rifinito e la scelta dei materiali è altrettanto eccellente. Il mix di alluminio e plastica è buono e migliora l'aspetto e la sensazione del dispositivo. Per quanto riguarda il prezzo di acquisto, Aoostar GEM12 è posizionato significativamente meglio rispetto ad altri mini-PC di questa classe di prestazioni. Questo vale anche per la connettività di Aoostar GEM12. Con USB4 e OCuLink, il produttore ha installato due interfacce moderne che possono certamente influenzare la decisione di acquisto. Tuttavia, Aoostar non può rivendicare questo come un punto di vendita unico, in quanto Minisforum ha già integrato la connessione OCuLink in alcuni dei suoi modelli. Tuttavia, la combinazione con la scheda grafica esterna ha fornito le migliori prestazioni con Aoostar GEM12.

Un altro aspetto positivo di Aoostar GEM12 è il sistema di raffreddamento integrato: a pieno carico, il mini-PC è significativamente più silenzioso rispetto ai concorrenti che abbiamo testato qui. Le prestazioni dell'AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS possono essere mantenute stabili per tutto il tempo. Aoostar commette un piccolo errore con il raffreddamento dell'SSD. Nonostante il raffreddamento attivo, la perdita di prestazioni sotto carico è minima. Il Aoostar GEM10 era in grado di offrire prestazioni più stabili dell'SSD con un'unità di raffreddamento più massiccia. Un altro piccolo punto debole sono le prestazioni della connessione wireless. Non riusciamo a capire perché il produttore non abbia installato il Wi-Fi 6E, dato che Aoostar è dotato di connessioni moderne come USB4 e OCuLink. Fortunatamente, il modulo wireless non è installato in modo permanente e può essere sostituito. Inoltre, l'utente ha ancora a disposizione due interfacce da 2,5 GBit, che non è necessariamente lo standard per i mini-PC.

Prezzo e disponibilità

Aoostar GEM12 è disponibile direttamente presso il produttore https://aoostar.com/products/aoostar-gem12-amd-ryzen-7-8845hs-mini-pc-with-16-32g-ddr5-ram-512g-1t-pcle-4-0-ssd-win-11-pro-2-nvme-oculink-2-2-5g-lan-non-screened-version?variant=48594310103338 in tre varianti, la versione barebone parte da 499 dollari. In alternativa, gli utenti possono acquistare il mini-PC tramite Amazon.

Aoostar GEM12 - 06/21/2024 v8
Sebastian Bade

Chassis

87 / 98 → 89%

Connettività

65 / 81 → 80%

Peso

81%

Prestazioni di gioco

52 / 80 → 66%

Prestazioni Applicazioni

86 / 92 → 93%

Workstation

55%

AI Performance

89%

Temperatura

89%

Rumorosità

86%

Media

60%

81%

Mini PC - Media ponderata

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
64.8%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 37.9%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.