Recensione del Geekom A8: Mini-PC premium da 0,5 litri con AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, 32 GB di RAM DDR5 e 2 TB SSD

Name: Geekom A8
Brand: Geekom

Potenza compatta.

La serie Geekom A combina prestazioni eccellenti con un fattore di forma estremamente compatto. Il produttore ha già dimostrato che questo concetto funziona con il Geekom A7. Il Geekom A8 dovrebbe offrire prestazioni ancora più elevate e si basa su AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, che sembra molto promettente. Abbiamo dato un'occhiata da vicino alla nuova ammiraglia e analizzato le sue prestazioni sulla base di numerosi benchmark.

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (traduzione a cura di DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 05/31/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Mini PC Desktop AMD Radeon Thunderbolt Zen 4

I mini-PC stanno diventando sempre più potenti e non hanno nulla da invidiare ai tradizionali PC desktop per quanto riguarda le prestazioni quotidiane. I PC compatti ottengono anche un punteggio elevato in termini di efficienza, spingendo l'uso dei mini-PC. Il Geekom A8 è basato sul Geekom A7 e colpisce per il suo design elegante. La configurazione di punta di questo mini-PC di altissima qualità e potenza si basa su un AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS con 32 GB di RAM DDR5 e un SSD da 2 TB. Se il Geekom A8 è sulla sua lista dei desideri, attualmente deve mettere sul tavolo circa 950 euro. La configurazione base è leggermente più economica, a 799 euro. Tuttavia, le prestazioni non dovrebbero differire molto dal modello di punta nella pratica, in quanto il AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS è identico e dispone di otto core e 16 thread.

Il Geekom A8 dovrà competere con il Geekom A7. Tuttavia, diamo un'occhiata alle prestazioni rispetto agli altri produttori di Mini-PC, che hanno anche dispositivi molto potenti nel loro portafoglio. Abbiamo compilato una panoramica dei dispositivi di confronto nella seguente tabella.

Dispositivo di test fornito da Geekom

Scarica la tua immagine come PNG / SVG

Geekom A8

Processore

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS 8 x 4 - 5.2 GHz, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)

Scheda grafica

AMD Radeon 780M, Core: 2800 MHz, Adrenalin 24.5.1

Memoria

32 GB

, DDR5-5600 MT/s

Scheda madre

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Harddisk

Acer N5000, 2048 GB

, M.2-2280, NVMe, 1800 GB libera

Scheda audio

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Porte di connessione

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen 2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 2 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Connessioni Audio: 3.5mm Klinke, Lettore schede: SD-Card (Full-Size)

Rete

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Dimensioni

altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 38 x 112 x 112

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Altre caratteristiche

120-Watt-Power-Adapter, 36 Mesi Garanzia

Peso

432 gr, Alimentazione: 255 gr

Prezzo

949 EUR

Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

guarda tutte le specifiche

Potenziali concorrenti a confrontos

Punteggio	Data	Modello	Memoria	Peso	Altezza
84.9 % v7 ^(old)	05/2024	Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	32768 MB	432 gr	38 mm
87.5 % v7 ^(old)	05/2024	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	32768 MB	863 gr	48.6 mm
83.4 % v7 ^(old)	04/2024	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	32768 MB	768 gr	57 mm
84.1 %	04/2024	Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	32768 MB	545 gr	37 mm
82.6 % v7 ^(old)	03/2024	Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	32768 MB	417 gr	38 mm
82.4 % v7 ^(old)	05/2024	Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	32768 MB	615 gr	55 mm
82.3 % v7 ^(old)	04/2024	Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	32768 MB	600 gr	58 mm

Geekom A8 in dettaglio

Geekom A8 con alimentatore (19 V; 6,32 A)

Custodia - Robusto alloggiamento in alluminio da 0,5l

Il Geekom A8 utilizza lo stesso alloggiamento del Geekom A7 che ha un aspetto e una sensazione di alta qualità. L'alloggiamento, realizzato interamente in alluminio, offre un'enorme stabilità e il design elegante ha un aspetto moderno. Con un volume di circa 0,5 l, il Geekom A8 e il Geekom A7 sono tra i dispositivi più compatti e combinano questo con un'enorme potenza di calcolo. In confronto, il Geekom A8 occupa meno spazio sulla scrivania e, con poco più di 400 grammi, il mini-PC è anche molto leggero.

Confronto delle dimensioni

Caratteristiche - Molte connessioni, tra cui USB4

Sebbene Geekom A8 sia estremamente compatto, il produttore ha dotato il mini-PC di un'ampia gamma di opzioni di connessione. Quattro porte USB Tipo-A sono sufficienti e, in termini di numeri, Geekom è in linea con la massa. L'interfaccia più moderna del Geekom A8 è la USB4, che può ampliare enormemente le possibilità di applicazione. Nel test, diamo un'occhiata alle prestazioni in combinazione con schede grafiche esterne. Gli schermi possono essere collegati direttamente tramite HDMI, anche se le due porte USB-C possono essere utilizzate in alternativa per l'uscita delle immagini. In totale, è possibile gestire quattro schermi contemporaneamente. Un'altra caratteristica positiva è il veloce lettore di schede SD, che si trova sul lato sinistro.

Le connessioni esterne del Geekom A8 (Fonte: Geekom)

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	181.79 MB/s +4%
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	176.8 MB/s +1%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	175.19 MB/s 0%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	174.57 MB/s
Geekom Mini IT13 Intel Core i9-13900H	154.449 MB/s -12%
Geekom Mini IT12 Intel Core i7-1260P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	129.2 MB/s -26%
Media della classe Mini PC (15.1 - 214, n=26, ultimi 2 anni)	97.7 MB/s -44%
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	65 MB/s -63%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	200.48 MB/s +10%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	185.62 MB/s +2%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	182.85 MB/s
Geekom A5 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	182.5 MB/s 0%
Geekom Mini IT13 Intel Core i9-13900H	180.4 MB/s -1%
Geekom Mini IT12 Intel Core i7-1260P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	176.8 MB/s -3%
Media della classe Mini PC (18.2 - 221, n=26, ultimi 2 anni)	112.4 MB/s -39%
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	69.9 MB/s -62%

Comunicazione

Nel Geekom A8 è installato un modulo WLAN MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922. Le prestazioni nelle nostre misurazioni sono buone e più che adatte all'uso quotidiano. Rispetto alla concorrenza, il nostro campione di prova si distingue solo in alcuni punti. Il modulo wireless può gestire le gamme di frequenza di 2,4 GHz, 5 GHz e 6 GHz. Per i test sulle prestazioni è stato utilizzato il router Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000. Nel Geekom A8 è installata anche una presa RJ45, che può essere utilizzata come connessione di rete alternativa. Qui sono possibili velocità di trasferimento fino a 2,5 GBit/s.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1770 (1584^min - 1790^max) MBit/s +21%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1761 (1734^min - 1774^max) MBit/s +21%
Geekom A8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1458 (1382^min - 1500^max) MBit/s
Media MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (684 - 1771, n=39)	1433 MBit/s -2%
Media della classe Mini PC (684 - 1771, n=55, ultimi 2 anni)	1380 MBit/s -5%
Geekom A7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1375 (688^min - 1438^max) MBit/s -6%
Geekom XT12 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1152 (576^min - 1273^max) MBit/s -21%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1615 (767^min - 1670^max) MBit/s +19%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1562 (1198^min - 1713^max) MBit/s +15%
Media MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (394 - 1800, n=38)	1399 MBit/s +3%
Geekom A7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1367 (1268^min - 1443^max) MBit/s +1%
Geekom A8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1356 (669^min - 1390^max) MBit/s
Media della classe Mini PC (394 - 1800, n=55, ultimi 2 anni)	1330 MBit/s -2%
Geekom XT12 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1315 (691^min - 1352^max) MBit/s -3%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1599 (802^min - 1683^max) MBit/s +45%
Media MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (707 - 1775, n=55)	1397 MBit/s +27%
Geekom A8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1101 (606^min - 1257^max) MBit/s
Media della classe Mini PC (320 - 1796, n=113, ultimi 2 anni)	945 MBit/s -14%
Geekom XT12 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	892 (460^min - 921^max) MBit/s -19%
Geekom A7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	858 (827^min - 886^max) MBit/s -22%
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	838 (728^min - 926^max) MBit/s -24%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 MediaTek MT7921	503 (371^min - 687^max) MBit/s -54%
Acemagic AM18 Realtek RTL8852BE	455 (221^min - 519^max) MBit/s -59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1566 (904^min - 1695^max) MBit/s +42%
Media MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (358 - 1785, n=55)	1279 MBit/s +16%
Geekom A8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1105 (489^min - 1222^max) MBit/s
Media della classe Mini PC (184.1 - 1776, n=113, ultimi 2 anni)	874 MBit/s -21%
Geekom A7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	831 (755^min - 940^max) MBit/s -25%
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	709 (369^min - 977^max) MBit/s -36%
Acemagic AM18 Realtek RTL8852BE	665 (343^min - 743^max) MBit/s -40%
Geekom XT12 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	589 (295^min - 624^max) MBit/s -47%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 MediaTek MT7921	531 (255^min - 725^max) MBit/s -52%

Geekom A8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1334 (669-1390)

Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW); iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1106 (177-1337)

Geekom A8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1458 (1382-1500)

Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW); iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1012 (571-1177)

Geekom A8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1080 (606-1257)

Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW); iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø762 (347-841)

Geekom A8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1088 (489-1222)

Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW); iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø768 (738-792)

Accessori

La fornitura comprende il Geekom A8 insieme all'alimentatore da 120 watt. La confezione contiene anche un cavo HDMI e una piastra di montaggio VESA.

Ambito di consegna del Geekom A8 (Fonte: Geekom)

Manutenzione

Geekom vende sempre l'A8 preconfigurato, il che significa che non deve necessariamente smontare il dispositivo. Tuttavia, la RAM e l'SSD possono essere rimossi e sostituiti, se necessario. Per smontare il dispositivo, deve prima rimuovere i piedini in gomma incollati sul lato inferiore. Sotto ci sono le quattro viti di fissaggio per rimuovere la piastra di base. Deve fare attenzione, perché il cavo dell'antenna WLAN non ha molto spazio di manovra e può essere danneggiato. C'è un'altra piastra metallica sotto la piastra di base, che deve essere rimossa se si vuole accedere all'SSD o alla RAM. Anche il modulo WLAN può essere sostituito e non è installato in modo permanente. La ventola della CPU si trova sull'altro lato della scheda e non può essere raggiunta senza smontarla completamente. Con un po' di destrezza, è possibile rimuovere l'intera unità (scheda con unità di raffreddamento) dall'alloggiamento.

Scheda del circuito del Geekom A8 con unità di raffreddamento

Vista dell'unità di raffreddamento sul Geekom A8

Prestazioni - AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS con 8 core e 16 threads

Il AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS assicura un'eccellente velocità di lavoro nel Geekom A8. Tecnicamente, il SoC si basa sull'architettura Zen4 e combina otto core con 16 thread. Se desidera acquistare una configurazione più economica, il Geekom A8 può essere equipaggiato con il modello AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS che presenta velocità di clock leggermente inferiori.

Condizioni del test

Abbiamo eseguito tutti i test sulle prestazioni con il piano energetico Bilanciato. Le prestazioni del SoC e l'allocazione della RAM (512 MB) non sono state modificate nel BIOS e sono state lasciate così come sono state fornite, in conformità alle impostazioni del produttore. Il BIOS stesso non offre comunque la possibilità di apportare modifiche.

Processore

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS o AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Fonte: Geekom)

Il nostro campione di prova è equipaggiato con il AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS. Questo appartiene alla serie Hawk Point ed è ancora basato sull'architettura Zen4. Ci sono pochi cambiamenti rispetto alla serie 7000, il che significa che il Geekom A8 non è particolarmente diverso dal Geekom A7 in termini di prestazioni. Il duello con il recente Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti ha vinto solo a tratti, ma nella pratica non si noterà una differenza notevole.

Per ulteriori confronti e benchmark, la invitiamo a consultare la nostra Tabella di confronto delle CPU.

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	58.2 pt
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	57.3 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	56.9 pt
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	56.9 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	55.6 pt
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	55.5 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	52.1 pt

Cinebench 2024
CPU Multi Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1067 Points +10%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1022 Points +6%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	967 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	923 Points -5%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	922 Points -5%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	746 Points -23%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	578 Points -40%
CPU Single Core
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	114 Points +6%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	110 Points +2%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	108 Points 0%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	108 Points 0%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	108 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	106 Points -2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	104 Points -4%

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	18497 Points +10%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	18016 Points +7%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	16795 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	15979 Points -5%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	15556 Points -7%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	14659 Points -13%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	11036 Points -34%
Single Core
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1901 Points +4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1851 Points +1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1825 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1824 Points 0%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1771 Points -3%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1747 Points -4%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1737 Points -5%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	287 Points
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	278 Points -3%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	274 Points -5%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	270 Points -6%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	268 Points -7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	258 Points -10%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	251 Points -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2746 Points +4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2738 Points +4%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2640 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2505 Points -5%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2470 Points -6%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	2249 Points -15%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	2121 Points -20%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	734 Points +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	715 Points +1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	711 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	701 Points -1%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	692 Points -3%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	679 Points -5%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	673 Points -5%
CPU (Multi Core)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7196 Points +9%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7188 Points +9%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6591 Points
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6277 Points -5%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6250 Points -5%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	5691 Points -14%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	4294 Points -35%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	3.45 Points
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	3.34 Points -3%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	3.29 Points -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3.27 Points -5%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	3.26 Points -6%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3.13 Points -9%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	2.99 Points -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	33.95 Points +8%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	33.49 Points +7%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	31.31 Points
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	29.8 Points -5%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	29.7 Points -5%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	27.25 Points -13%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	21.11 Points -33%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	15303 Points +5%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	14561 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	14374 Points -1%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	14300 Points -2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	14015 Points -4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13938 Points -4%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	13378 Points -8%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	95005 Points +5%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	90144 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	88902 Points -1%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	84721 Points -6%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	83726 Points -7%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	75947 Points -16%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	69621 Points -23%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	296 Seconds * -51%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	234 Seconds * -19%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	202 Seconds * -3%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	202 Seconds * -3%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	196 Seconds *
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	178 Seconds * +9%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	171 Seconds * +13%

wPrime 2.10
32m
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	4.111 s * -60%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3.523 s * -37%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	3.454 s * -35%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3.254 s * -27%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2.658 s * -4%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2.648 s * -3%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2.563 s *
1024m
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	441.275 s * -550%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	202.68 s * -198%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	186.394 s * -174%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	139.617 s * -106%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	98.222 s * -45%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	71.922 s * -6%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	67.933 s *

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 1
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	335.5 (329^min - 340^max) fps +13%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	325 (323^min - 328^max) fps +9%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	317.5 (292^min - 319^max) fps +7%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	298 (297^min - 305^max) fps
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	292.5 (291^min - 296^max) fps -2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	281.5 (277^min - 286^max) fps -6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	262 (259^min - 282^max) fps -12%
Pass 2
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	158.2 (157.4^min - 158.8^max) fps +5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	154.15 (153.8^min - 154.3^max) fps +2%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	150.65 (150.4^min - 154.2^max) fps
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	144.1 (143.9^min - 145.6^max) fps -4%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	140.8 (138.2^min - 144.7^max) fps -7%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	125.05 (112.4^min - 132^max) fps -17%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	92.2 (91^min - 114.5^max) fps -39%

WinRAR - Result
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	8735 KB/s +11%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7945 KB/s +1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7940 KB/s +1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7843 KB/s
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7723 KB/s -2%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	7490 KB/s -5%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6428 KB/s -18%

TrueCrypt
AES Mean 100MB
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	15.4 GB/s
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	15.1 GB/s -2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	14.7 GB/s -5%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	13 GB/s -16%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11.3 GB/s -27%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	11.2 GB/s -27%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10.6 GB/s -31%
Twofish Mean 100MB
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	2.2 GB/s +10%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2.1 GB/s +5%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2.1 GB/s +5%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2 GB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1.9 GB/s -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1.8 GB/s -10%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1.7 GB/s -15%
Serpent Mean 100MB
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1.4 GB/s
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1.3 GB/s -7%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1.3 GB/s -7%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1.2 GB/s -14%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1.1 GB/s -21%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1.1 GB/s -21%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1 GB/s -29%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13392 Points +7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12662 Points +1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	12481 Points
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12261 Points -2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	12049 Points -3%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	10378 Points -17%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	10028 Points -20%
Single-Core
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2008 Points +1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1996 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1946 Points -3%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1866 Points -7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1856 Points -7%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1790 Points -10%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1746 Points -13%

Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Multi-Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13228 Points +7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12438 Points 0%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	12386 Points
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12127 Points -2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	12019 Points -3%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	10276 Points -17%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	9892 Points -20%
5.0 Single-Core
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1918 Points +1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1906 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1870 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1821 Points -4%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	1795 Points -6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1710 Points -10%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1708 Points -10%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	8253 Points +1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	8178 Points
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	7932 Points -3%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	7924 Points -3%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7635 Points -7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7602 Points -7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6927 Points -15%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	49269 Points
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	48723 Points -1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	47960 Points -3%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	47599 Points -3%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	45250 Points -8%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	39510 Points -20%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	37359 Points -24%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	22978 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	22786 Points -1%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	22600 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	21875 Points -5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	20846 Points -9%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	18553 Points -19%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	16634 Points -28%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	71934 MIPS 0%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	71874 MIPS
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	70723 MIPS -2%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	70707 MIPS -2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	66438 MIPS -8%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	55620 MIPS -23%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	47146 MIPS -34%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6744 MIPS +1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6668 MIPS
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6545 MIPS -2%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	6136 MIPS -8%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	5881 MIPS -12%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5560 MIPS -17%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5485 MIPS -18%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	20.9 fps 0%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	20.9 fps
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	20.6 fps -1%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	20.5 fps -2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	19.6 fps -6%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	16.2 fps -22%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	12.3 fps -41%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4652 sec * -7%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	0.4632 sec * -7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	0.4627 sec * -6%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	0.4398 sec * -1%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	0.4391 sec * -1%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	0.4351 sec * -0%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	0.4346 sec *

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	54.8 s * -10%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	49.9 s *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	49.5 s * +1%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	47.7 s * +4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	44.5 s * +11%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	39.6 s * +21%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	37.2 s * +25%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	333 Points +5%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	320 Points +1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	316 Points
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	301 Points -5%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	291 Points -8%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	276 Points -13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	264 Points -16%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	535 ms * -6%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	532 ms * -5%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	518 ms * -3%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	511 ms * -1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	505 ms *
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	503 ms * -0%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	499 ms * +1%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	27732 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	27120 Points -2%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	26093 Points -6%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	26038 Points -6%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	25816 Points -7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	25043 Points -10%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	22242 Points -20%
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11481 Points +2%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	11298 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	10926 Points -3%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	10402 Points -8%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	10397 Points -8%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10014 Points -11%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7985 Points -29%

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7.454 s * -6%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	7.442 s * -6%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	7.281 s * -3%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7.168 s * -2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	7.112 s * -1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7.045 s *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	6.751 s * +4%

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	18.402 s * -5%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	17.697 s * -1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	17.549 s *
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	16.498 s * +6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	16.424 s * +6%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.125 s * +8%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	14.879 s * +15%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	655.388 s * -5%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	624.748 s *
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	529.929 s * +15%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK	397.363 s * +36%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	396.475 s * +37%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	394.754 s * +37%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	304.446 s * +51%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

7748

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

21082 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

90144 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

14561 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

17730

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

49325

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

2.98 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

27.66 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

3.45 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

31.31 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

287 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2640 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

231.81 fps

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

711 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6591 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

16795 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1825 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

108 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

967 Points

Aiuto

... in confronto

Performance Rating
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	97.2 pt
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	94.3 pt
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	94 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	80.7 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	76.7 pt
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	59.2 pt
Media della classe Mini PC	56.7 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	51.1 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	26846 KRay/s
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	25725 KRay/s -4%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	25359 KRay/s -6%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	17544 KRay/s -35%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	17312 KRay/s -36%
Media della classe Mini PC (646 - 51004, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	12878 KRay/s -52%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	12389 KRay/s -54%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	10476 KRay/s -61%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	113406 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	108506 Points -4%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	107540 Points -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	91112 Points -20%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	88829 Points -22%
Media della classe Mini PC (3857 - 214250, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	64921 Points -43%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	64350 Points -43%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	54166 Points -52%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	4952 MB/s
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	4769 MB/s -4%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	4753 MB/s -4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	4343 MB/s -12%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	4246 MB/s -14%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3028 MB/s -39%
Media della classe Mini PC (260 - 9399, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	2856 MB/s -42%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2504 MB/s -49%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	119802 Points
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	118174 Points -1%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	115133 Points -4%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	99851 Points -17%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	89748 Points -25%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	87291 Points -27%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	82291 Points -31%
Media della classe Mini PC (8172 - 184747, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	80187 Points -33%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	15026 Points
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	14663 Points -2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	14590 Points -3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	10759 Points -28%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	10247 Points -32%
Media della classe Mini PC (408 - 29064, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	8812 Points -41%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8417 Points -44%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7317 Points -51%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	60482 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	57881 Points -4%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	57402 Points -5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	45718 Points -24%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	44874 Points -26%
Media della classe Mini PC (1987 - 113499, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	33863 Points -44%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	31933 Points -47%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	26850 Points -56%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	169431 MB/s
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	164414 MB/s -3%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	163604 MB/s -3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	154066 MB/s -9%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	144741 MB/s -15%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	112254 MB/s -34%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	95500 MB/s -44%
Media della classe Mini PC (3691 - 325960, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	88382 MB/s -48%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	1233 MB/s +20%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1183 MB/s +15%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	1042 MB/s +1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	1029 MB/s
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	1020 MB/s -1%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	870 MB/s -15%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	745 MB/s -28%
Media della classe Mini PC (74.9 - 2039, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	740 MB/s -28%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	14240 KRay/s
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	13617 KRay/s -4%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	13517 KRay/s -5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9284 KRay/s -35%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	9270 KRay/s -35%
Media della classe Mini PC (350 - 26952, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	6881 KRay/s -52%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6325 KRay/s -56%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5777 KRay/s -59%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	45560 MPixel/s +13%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	40655 MPixel/s 0%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	40570 MPixel/s 0%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	40475 MPixel/s
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	33092 MPixel/s -18%
Media della classe Mini PC (4408 - 50500, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	28301 MPixel/s -30%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	24903 MPixel/s -38%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	24858 MPixel/s -39%

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

Il ciclo di resistenza Cinebench R15 è il nostro primo test di resistenza per vedere come il sistema di raffreddamento riesce a gestire il potente AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS. All'inizio, vediamo una prestazione abbastanza stabile del processore, che diminuisce leggermente nella seconda metà. Fino a 65 watt sono disponibili per il SoC nel breve termine, anche se si raggiungono poco meno di 50 watt in caso di carico prolungato. Il limite di temperatura del processore nel Geekom A8 è definito come 90 °C. Nel confronto delle prestazioni, questo è sufficiente al nostro mini-PC per assicurarsi il terzo posto. Solo il Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti e il Acemagic F2A offrono prestazioni migliori in questo test.

Metriche della CPU durante il ciclo di Cinebench R15

Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS: Ø2605 (2529.88-2677.73)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2784 (2721.64-2831.86)

Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2759 (2690.7-2800.92)

Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø1545 (1395.97-2133.22)

Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2410 (2285.58-2581.81)

Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø1981 (1895.47-2262.7)

Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2489 (2476.93-2539.84)

Prestazioni del sistema

Le prestazioni del sistema del Geekom A8 sono eccezionali. Tuttavia, questo vale anche per gli altri dispositivi di prova che hanno già completato il nostro percorso di test. Difficilmente si noterà una differenza notevole nell'uso quotidiano. Tuttavia, le differenze sono misurabili, anche se variano solo di pochi punti percentuali nei primi posti. Il Geekom A7 può essere facilmente superato in tutti i test.

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity

PCMark 10 / Score
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	7705 Points
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	7651 Points -1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	7510 Points -3%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	7455 Points -3%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	7120 Points -8%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	6435 Points -16%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	6295 Points -18%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	11591 Points +2%
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	11333 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	11273 Points -1%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	11125 Points -2%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	11114 Points -2%
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	11097 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	11030 Points -3%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	11082 Points
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	10970 Points -1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	10484 Points -5%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	10291 Points -7%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	8901 Points -20%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	8114 Points -27%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	7924 Points -28%

CrossMark: Overall | Responsiveness | Creativity | Productivity

CrossMark / Overall
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	1986 Points +6%
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	1866 Points
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	1861 Points 0%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1860 Points 0%
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	1828 Points -2%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1802 Points -3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1675 Points -10%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	2205 Points +48%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1919 Points +28%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1700 Points +14%
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	1541 Points +3%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	1540 Points +3%
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	1494 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1378 Points -8%

CrossMark / Creativity
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	2127 Points
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	2072 Points -3%
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	2030 Points -5%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1929 Points -9%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	1907 Points -10%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1883 Points -11%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1870 Points -12%

CrossMark / Productivity
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	1996 Points +13%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1831 Points +4%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	1781 Points +1%
Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	1764 Points
Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	1743 Points -1%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1717 Points -3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1589 Points -10%

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	71990 MB/s +5%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	68603 MB/s
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	68299 MB/s 0%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	67161 MB/s -2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	62397 MB/s -9%
Media della classe Mini PC (6481 - 89287, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	48357 MB/s -30%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	45792 MB/s -33%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44442 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	75449 MB/s +22%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	64323 MB/s +4%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	61710 MB/s
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	61542 MB/s 0%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	61463 MB/s 0%
Media della classe Mini PC (6914 - 99171, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	49177 MB/s -20%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	48963 MB/s -21%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	47960 MB/s -22%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	86974 MB/s
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	86810 MB/s 0%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	86273 MB/s -1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	70596 MB/s -19%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	65057 MB/s -25%
Media della classe Mini PC (6862 - 98583, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	52856 MB/s -39%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	47201 MB/s -46%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	45952 MB/s -47%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	149 ns * -63%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	146.1 ns * -60%
Media della classe Mini PC (44.9 - 184.8, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	92.1 ns * -1%
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	91.2 ns *
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	89 ns * +2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	87.9 ns * +4%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	79.9 ns * +12%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	74.7 ns * +18%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Latenze DPC

Il Geekom A8 fallisce in termini di latenza, e persino la navigazione con il browser Edge comporta un aumento dei valori. Le latenze aumentano ulteriormente poco dopo l'avvio della riproduzione del video di prova 4K. Tuttavia, il Geekom A8 non ha problemi durante la riproduzione di video ad alta risoluzione. L'utilizzo dell'iGPU è notevolmente elevato, pari al 60 percento. L'iGPU del Geekom A7 è stata utilizzata solo al 30 percento nello stesso test.

Massima latenza quando si aprono più schede del browser e si riproduce materiale video in 4K

Latenza massima dopo dieci secondi di Prime95

Driver classificati in base al tempo di esecuzione più lungo

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2724 μs * -30%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2151 μs * -3%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	2097.9 μs *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2069.2 μs * +1%
Geekom A7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000	1616.1 μs * +23%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	1026 μs * +51%
Acemagic AM18 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	900 μs * +57%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Memoria di massa

Il Geekom A8 presenta lo stesso modello che abbiamo già testato nel Geekom A7 Geekom A7. Il modello Acer offre prestazioni solide. L'Acer N5000 non è uno degli SSD più veloci, ma il dispositivo di archiviazione di massa supera a pieni voti l'uso quotidiano. Non ci sono problemi termici, il che è eccellente considerando il design compatto. Con 2 TB, il produttore ha anche installato un modello con molto spazio di archiviazione. Questo è un aspetto positivo, in quanto non è possibile installare un supporto dati aggiuntivo nel dispositivo.

Per ulteriori confronti e benchmark, la invitiamo a consultare la nostra Tabella di confronto.

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Acer N5000

Sequential Read: 3796 MB/s

Sequential Write: 3592 MB/s

512K Read: 2074 MB/s

512K Write: 2565 MB/s

4K Read: 50.54 MB/s

4K Write: 138.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 543.2 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 610.2 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	94 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	72.6 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	65 pt
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	63.2 pt
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	62.9 pt
Media della classe Mini PC	53.9 pt
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	51.2 pt
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	50 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	3755 (3733.85^min - 3754.99^max) MB/s +21%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	3114 (3080.09^min - 3114.48^max) MB/s
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	2668 (2648.91^min - 2668.42^max) MB/s -14%
Media della classe Mini PC (277 - 4357, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	2333 MB/s -25%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2315 (2293.84^min - 2315.26^max) MB/s -26%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	2279 (2272.33^min - 2279.03^max) MB/s -27%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2178 (2158.39^min - 2177.68^max) MB/s -30%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1674 (1242.56^min - 1673.54^max) MB/s -46%
seq write
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	3866 (206.78^min - 3865.71^max) MB/s +18%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	3492 (3398.43^min - 3491.76^max) MB/s +7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3386 (3076.94^min - 3385.64^max) MB/s +4%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	3271 (3235.73^min - 3270.93^max) MB/s
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	2629 (1414.22^min - 2628.56^max) MB/s -20%
Media della classe Mini PC (229 - 5595, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	2509 MB/s -23%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2341 (2252.02^min - 2341.4^max) MB/s -28%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1348 (1117.85^min - 1347.87^max) MB/s -59%
seq q8 t1 read
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	4861 (4468.61^min - 4860.57^max) MB/s +1%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	4800 (4387.45^min - 4800.17^max) MB/s
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	4780 (4492.97^min - 4780.46^max) MB/s 0%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	4769 (3791.02^min - 4769.24^max) MB/s -1%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	4684 (4089.86^min - 4684.2^max) MB/s -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4676 (4310.07^min - 4675.81^max) MB/s -3%
Media della classe Mini PC (236 - 8430, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	3790 MB/s -21%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	3194 (2810.81^min - 3194.17^max) MB/s -33%
seq q8 t1 write
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	4695 (4470.16^min - 4694.73^max) MB/s +15%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	4081 (3987.52^min - 4081.49^max) MB/s
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	3901 (912.47^min - 3901.29^max) MB/s -4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3729 (3700.15^min - 3728.95^max) MB/s -9%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	3255 (2485.13^min - 3254.57^max) MB/s -20%
Media della classe Mini PC (239 - 6669, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	2810 MB/s -31%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	2627 (2402.52^min - 2626.88^max) MB/s -36%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2212 (1222.43^min - 2212.27^max) MB/s -46%
4k q1 t1 read
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	80.9 (78.95^min - 80.85^max) MB/s +49%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	64.1 (56.32^min - 64.06^max) MB/s +18%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	63.5 (59.81^min - 63.5^max) MB/s +17%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	55.6 (53.92^min - 55.58^max) MB/s +2%
Media della classe Mini PC (6.85 - 86.6, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	55.3 MB/s +2%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	54.4 (52.17^min - 54.39^max) MB/s
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	52.3 (51.85^min - 52.27^max) MB/s -4%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	47.3 (47.07^min - 47.31^max) MB/s -13%
4k q1 t1 write
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	422 (409.3^min - 421.98^max) MB/s +149%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	279 (237.61^min - 279.08^max) MB/s +65%
Media della classe Mini PC (30.4 - 435, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	196.9 MB/s +16%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	187.2 (181.54^min - 187.2^max) MB/s +11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	184.4 (177.6^min - 184.36^max) MB/s +9%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	169.3 (157.77^min - 169.29^max) MB/s
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	165.9 (164.35^min - 165.92^max) MB/s -2%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	151.3 (148.71^min - 151.28^max) MB/s -11%
4k q32 t16 read
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	2967 (2962.7^min - 2967.4^max) MB/s +90%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1824 (1239.47^min - 1824.09^max) MB/s +17%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	1560 (1546.89^min - 1559.94^max) MB/s 0%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	1558 (1523.21^min - 1557.75^max) MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1452 (1402.67^min - 1451.9^max) MB/s -7%
Media della classe Mini PC (26.1 - 4158, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	1411 MB/s -9%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1143 (1091.01^min - 1142.98^max) MB/s -27%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	910 (889.36^min - 909.64^max) MB/s -42%
4k q32 t16 write
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	3364 (866.38^min - 3364.31^max) MB/s +461%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	1583 (825.5^min - 1583.41^max) MB/s +164%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1499 (1114.25^min - 1499.4^max) MB/s +150%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1434 (1410.26^min - 1433.71^max) MB/s +139%
Media della classe Mini PC (32.6 - 4288, n=119, ultimi 2 anni)	1332 MB/s +122%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	600 (492.7^min - 600.03^max) MB/s
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	595 (582.97^min - 594.71^max) MB/s -1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	497 (467.49^min - 497.28^max) MB/s -17%

AS SSD
Score Total
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	7931 Points +55%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	5975 Points +16%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	5177 Points +1%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	5132 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4987 Points -3%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	4412 Points -14%
Media della classe Mini PC (211 - 10021, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	4244 Points -17%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	3435 Points -33%
Score Read
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	2899 Points +76%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2119 Points +29%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	1685 Points +3%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	1643 Points
Media della classe Mini PC (76 - 3741, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	1578 Points -4%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1561 Points -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1482 Points -10%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	1248 Points -24%
Score Write
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	3564 Points +30%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2807 Points +3%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2777 Points +2%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	2735 Points
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	2676 Points -2%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2082 Points -24%
Media della classe Mini PC (88 - 4371, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	1902 Points -30%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	1600 Points -41%
Seq Read
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	4349.85 MB/s +16%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	4162 MB/s +11%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	3835 MB/s +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3779 MB/s +1%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	3741 MB/s
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	3650 MB/s -2%
Media della classe Mini PC (291 - 6620, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	3231 MB/s -14%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	3010 MB/s -20%
Seq Write
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	3936.64 MB/s +108%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	3477 MB/s +83%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	2611 MB/s +38%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	2568 MB/s +35%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2369 MB/s +25%
Media della classe Mini PC (242 - 5783, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	2292 MB/s +21%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2285 MB/s +20%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	1897 MB/s
4K Read
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	104.3 MB/s +107%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	80.89 MB/s +61%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	63.3 MB/s +26%
Media della classe Mini PC (21.4 - 104.3, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	59.7 MB/s +19%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	52.4 MB/s +4%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	50.3 MB/s
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	49.7 MB/s -1%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	41.8 MB/s -17%
4K Write
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	366 MB/s +113%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	316.33 MB/s +84%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	238 MB/s +39%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	196.9 MB/s +15%
Media della classe Mini PC (30.9 - 366, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	177.5 MB/s +3%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	171.7 MB/s
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	160 MB/s -7%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	139.4 MB/s -19%
4K-64 Read
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	2379 MB/s +95%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1602.91 MB/s +32%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	1270 MB/s +4%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1218 MB/s 0%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	1218 MB/s
Media della classe Mini PC (23.4 - 3220, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	1195 MB/s -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1041 MB/s -15%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	812 MB/s -33%
4K-64 Write
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	2850 MB/s +20%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	2374 MB/s
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2340 MB/s -1%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	2255 MB/s -5%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2066.57 MB/s -13%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1649 MB/s -31%
Media della classe Mini PC (32.8 - 3731, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	1495 MB/s -37%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	1204 MB/s -49%
Access Time Read
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	0.173 ms * -151%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	0.138 ms * -100%
Media della classe Mini PC (0.022 - 0.489, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	0.09579 ms * -39%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	0.069 ms *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.067 ms * +3%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	0.049 ms * +29%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	0.046 ms * +33%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	0.044 ms * +36%
Access Time Write
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	0.126 ms * -75%
Media della classe Mini PC (0.014 - 0.765, n=117, ultimi 2 anni)	0.1133 ms * -57%
Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe	0.078 ms * -8%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	0.072 ms * -0%
Geekom A8 Acer N5000	0.072 ms *
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	0.059 ms * +18%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0	0.031 ms * +57%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.02 ms * +72%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Geekom A8 Acer N5000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4786 (4324.07-4802.27)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4683 (3872.18-4767.25)

Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1320 (771.89-3141.95)

Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1764 (1425.22-4795.56)

Geekom A7 Acer N5000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4848 (4561.2-4857.36)

Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4764 (3862.99-4794.3)

Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4663 (3995.26-4684.2)

Scheda grafica

La AMD Radeon 780M si trova in diversi concorrenti. Come iGPU del AMD Ryzen, 9 8945HSl'unità grafica moderna è utilizzata anche nel Geekom A8. Solo 512 MB di RAM sono riservati all'iGPU nello stato di consegna. Non è molto, ma può essere regolato nell'UEFI. Con la stessa configurazione, il Geekom A7 offre prestazioni equivalenti rispetto al più recente A8. Nel confronto delle prestazioni, possiamo anche vedere che la Radeon 780M di AMD è in grado di tenere il passo con un Intel Arc 8.

Ulteriori confronti e benchmark sono disponibili nella nostra Tabella di confronto delle GPU.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	97.5 pt
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	96 pt
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	95.7 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	92.9 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	91.4 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	54.7 pt
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	54.7 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	13932 Points +3%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	13636 Points +1%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	13533 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12085 Points -11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11691 Points -14%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	6999 Points -48%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	6975 Points -48%

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3205 Points +10%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3193 Points +10%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2968 Points +2%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2912 Points 0%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2901 Points
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	1583 Points -45%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	1581 Points -46%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	8391 Points 0%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	8354 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	8327 Points 0%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7710 Points -8%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7599 Points -9%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	5421 Points -35%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	5407 Points -35%

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	34 fps +25%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	31.6 fps +16%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	29.7 fps +9%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	27.3 fps
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	26 fps -5%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	22.3 fps -18%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	21.8 fps -20%
Extreme Preset DX11
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	35.3 fps +8%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	33.2 fps +1%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	32.8 fps
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	32.7 fps 0%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	32 fps -2%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	23.2 fps -29%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	22.7 fps -31%

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	24 fps +26%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	19.1 fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	18.5 fps -3%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	17.7 fps -7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17.1 fps -10%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	13.7 fps -28%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	13.3 fps -30%
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	32.4 fps +113%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	20.8 fps +37%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	18.3 fps +20%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	15.2 fps
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	14.6 fps -4%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	13.9 fps -9%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12.2 fps -20%

Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	11903 Points +11%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	10702 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10491 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	10102 Points -6%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	9725 Points -9%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	6129 Points -43%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	5950 Points -44%
1920x1080 1080p High
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	3631 Points +7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3391 Points 0%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	3387 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3341 Points -1%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	3129 Points -8%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	2113 Points -38%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	2035 Points -40%
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1920 Points +21%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1812 Points +14%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1777 Points +12%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1585 Points
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1577 Points -1%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	1060 Points -33%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	1042 Points -34%

ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	9863 Points +11%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	9796 Points +10%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	8909 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7480 Points -16%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	6270 Points -30%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	3390 Points -62%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	3382 Points -62%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	492 Points
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	479 Points -3%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	471 Points -4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	469 Points -5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	427 Points -13%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	231 Points -53%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	226 Points -54%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	492 Points
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	486 Points -1%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	484 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	462 Points -6%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	422 Points -14%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	246 Points -50%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	239 Points -51%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2589 Points +10%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2574 Points +9%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2356 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1961 Points -17%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1620 Points -31%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	860 Points -63%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	850 Points -64%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2651 Points +13%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2608 Points +11%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2345 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1594 Points -32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1274 Points -46%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	872 Points -63%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	866 Points -63%
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	3667 Points +14%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	3650 Points +13%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	3225 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3076 Points -5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2444 Points -24%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	1201 Points -63%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	1182 Points -63%

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1173 Samples/s
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	817 Samples/s -30%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	808 Samples/s -31%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	640 Samples/s -45%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	577 Samples/s -51%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	549 Samples/s -53%
Sala GPUs-only
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2732 Samples/s +176%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	2349 Samples/s +137%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2319 Samples/s +134%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1522 Samples/s +54%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1512 Samples/s +53%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	991 Samples/s

Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5308 Points +251%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	4928 Points +226%
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK	4215 Points +179%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	3830 Points +153%
Geekom A8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1512 Points
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1396 Points -8%
Acemagic AM18 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1371 Points -9%

	Geekom A8, AMD Radeon 780M R9 8945HS	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 9 185H	Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 7 155H	Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900H	Geekom A7, AMD Radeon 780M R9 7940HS	Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900HK	Acemagic AM18, AMD Radeon 780M R7 7840HS	Media della classe Mini PC
SPECviewperf 12		-51%	-53%	-60%	7%	-59%	7%	-19%
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)	87.4	49.7 -43%	49.8 -43%	40.1 -54%	84.7 -3%	40.2 -54%	83.7 -4%	75.4 ?(13.6 - 295, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) -14%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)	86.4	51.3 -41%	48.2 -44%	37.1 -57%	89 3%	35.9 -58%	88.5 2%	64.2 ?(10.9 - 251, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) -26%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)	55.1	22.7 -59%	23.1 -58%	26.9 -51%	55.4 1%	27.7 -50%	56.3 2%	37 ?(4.03 - 117, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) -33%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)	19	0.67 -96%	0.91 -95%	0.4 -98%	20.7 9%	0.4 -98%	21.3 12%	13.3 ?(0.15 - 80.4, n=57, ultimi 2 anni) -30%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)	75	58 -23%	54.9 -27%	38.3 -49%	69.7 -7%	39.8 -47%	71.5 -5%	64 ?(11.4 - 226, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) -15%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)	47.7	15.9 -67%	16.9 -65%	11.8 -75%	60.5 27%	12.2 -74%	60.5 27%	28.5 ?(2.53 - 136, n=60, ultimi 2 anni) -40%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)	25.8	19.9 -23%	18.2 -29%	16.6 -36%	30.3 17%	17.4 -33%	30 16%	35.3 ?(5.71 - 133, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) 37%
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)	106	43 -59%	42.7 -60%	45.3 -57%	116 9%	47.3 -55%	116 9%	72.4 ?(20.9 - 243, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) -32%
SPECviewperf 13		-50%	-51%	-56%	5%	-57%	7%	-14%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)	85.8	48.5 -43%	46.4 -46%	40.1 -53%	83.9 -2%	39.9 -53%	83.1 -3%	74.8 ?(13.4 - 294, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) -13%
Catia (catia-05)	126	76.8 -39%	71.6 -43%	51.3 -59%	130 3%	51.6 -59%	129 2%	91.4 ?(15.6 - 381, n=62, ultimi 2 anni) -27%
Creo (creo-02)	92.8	29.3 -68%	29.6 -68%	41.1 -56%	93.4 1%	40.2 -57%	92 -1%	73 ?(11.6 - 275, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) -21%
Energy (energy-02)	22.6	5.27 -77%	5.69 -75%	4.5 -80%	23.8 5%	4.39 -81%	24.1 7%	17.7 ?(0.92 - 310, n=60, ultimi 2 anni) -22%
Maya (maya-05)	103	62.5 -39%	59.5 -42%	47.5 -54%	107 4%	48.3 -53%	108 5%	97.5 ?(15.9 - 340, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) -5%
Medical (medical-02)	69.2	25 -64%	29.7 -57%	14.4 -79%	77.6 12%	14.4 -79%	79 14%	37.6 ?(2.28 - 198, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) -46%
Showcase (showcase-02)	24.2	19.9 -18%	18.2 -25%	17.3 -29%	25.4 5%	17.3 -29%	29.9 24%	35 ?(5.69 - 133, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) 45%
Solidworks (sw-04)	97.3	45.6 -53%	44.8 -54%	57.1 -41%	109 12%	57.4 -41%	107 10%	76.6 ?(27.4 - 223, n=63, ultimi 2 anni) -21%
SPECviewperf 2020		-56%	-58%	-69%	-11%	-68%	-9%	-21%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)	10.9	4.23 -61%	5.05 -54%	3.49 -68%	11.1 2%	3.48 -68%	13 19%	7.85 ?(0.78 - 30.8, n=66, ultimi 2 anni) -28%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)	31	6.03 -81%	4.61 -85%	3.05 -90%	14.1 -55%	3 -90%	14.2 -54%	11.3 ?(0.52 - 47.9, n=66, ultimi 2 anni) -64%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)	35.6	18.5 -48%	17.9 -50%	14.8 -58%	31.4 -12%	15.1 -58%	31.2 -12%	30.7 ?(7.73 - 97.5, n=66, ultimi 2 anni) -14%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)	24.6	11.1 -55%	10 -59%	7.78 -68%	24.8 1%	8.08 -67%	24.7 0%	18.6 ?(4.61 - 64.1, n=65, ultimi 2 anni) -24%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)	21	14.9 -29%	12.9 -39%	9.69 -54%	20.9 0%	9.78 -53%	20.7 -1%	22.5 ?(5.53 - 87.5, n=66, ultimi 2 anni) 7%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)	65.9	6.24 -91%	5.7 -91%	6.29 -90%	61.4 -7%	6.67 -90%	61.1 -7%	37.2 ?(2.25 - 224, n=64, ultimi 2 anni) -44%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)	50.1	37.7 -25%	35.4 -29%	23.9 -52%	47 -6%	24.4 -51%	46.7 -7%	58.9 ?(12.2 - 223, n=66, ultimi 2 anni) 18%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)		-52% / -52%	-54% / -54%	-62% / -61%	0% / 1%	-61% / -61%	2% / 2%	-18% / -18%

3DMark 05 Standard		55721 punti
3DMark 06 Score 1366x768		45913 punti
3DMark Vantage P Result		41775 punti
3DMark 11 Performance		13321 punti
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		168113 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		37487 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score		7670 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		4072 punti
3DMark Time Spy Score		3264 punti
Aiuto

... in confronto

Prestazioni di gioco

La AMD Radeon 780M è solo una iGPU, ma ha buone prestazioni 3D che rendono possibile giocare ad alcuni giochi. Bisogna accettare alcune limitazioni in termini di livello di dettaglio per ottenere frame rate adeguati. Le prestazioni di gioco dipendono molto dal gioco in questione e non possono essere quantificate su tutta la linea.

Per una panoramica dettagliata delle prestazioni dell'iGPU rispetto ad altre schede grafiche, la invitiamo a consultare il nostro Elenco dei giochi GPU.

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	153.5 (20.1^min, 43.1^P0.1, 107.8^P1) fps 0%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	153.5 (7.45^min, 37.4^P0.1, 101.7^P1) fps
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)	135.1 fps -12%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G	130.7 fps -15%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G	107.7 fps -30%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	102 fps -34%
Geekom Mini IT12 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0	86.9 fps -43%
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	85.9 fps -44%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	49.1 (23.1^min, 38.4^P0.1, 40.8^P1) fps +6%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	46.2 (14.1^min, 14.7^P0.1, 16^P1) fps
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)	43.3 fps -6%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G	42.6 fps -8%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G	39.3 fps -15%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	33.5 fps -27%
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	32.3 fps -30%
Geekom Mini IT12 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0	28.9 fps -37%

Borderlands 3
1280x720 Very Low Overall Quality (DX11)
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	102.5 fps
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	97.3 fps -5%
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)	90.4 fps -12%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G	86.6 fps -16%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G	66.4 fps -35%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	54.5 fps -47%
Geekom Mini IT12 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0	51.8 fps -49%
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	50.7 fps -51%
1920x1080 High Overall Quality (DX11)
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	33.3 fps +20%
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)	29 fps +4%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	27.8 fps
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G	26.2 fps -6%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G	17.7 fps -36%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	16.1 fps -42%
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	15.3 fps -45%
Geekom Mini IT12 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0	14.8 fps -47%

GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	166.9 (5.05^min, 125^P1) fps
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	164.4 (4.9^min, 111.1^P1) fps -1%
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)	157.8 (4.54^min, 111.1^P1) fps -5%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G	155.4 (6.68^min, 111.1^P1) fps -7%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G	125.5 (11.9^min, 83.3^P1) fps -25%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	124.5 (12.7^min, 76.9^P1) fps -25%
Geekom Mini IT12 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0	119.3 (25.1^min, 76.9^P1) fps -29%
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	112.7 (9.9^min, 71.4^P1) fps -32%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	66.9 (3.09^min, 45.5^P1) fps +3%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	64.7 (4.56^min, 31.3^P1) fps
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)	59.7 (4.52^min, 40^P1) fps -8%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G	52.2 (11.6^min, 26.3^P1) fps -19%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G	49.2 (13.3^min, 33.3^P1) fps -24%
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	23.6 (10.9^min, 18.2^P1) fps -64%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	20.9 (10.5^min, 16.7^P1) fps -68%
Geekom Mini IT12 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0	18.6 (8^min, 14.3^P1) fps -71%

Far Cry 5
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	88 (77^min) fps
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	87 (75^min) fps -1%
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)	80 (69^min) fps -9%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G	73 (65^min) fps -17%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G	68 (58^min) fps -23%
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	54 (44^min) fps -39%
Geekom Mini IT12 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0	50 (41^min) fps -43%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	45 (40^min) fps -49%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	47 (42^min) fps +12%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	42 (33^min) fps
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)	41 (36^min) fps -2%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G	40 (35^min) fps -5%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G	38 (32^min) fps -10%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	27 (25^min) fps -36%
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	26 (23^min) fps -38%
Geekom Mini IT12 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0	25 (22^min) fps -40%

Far Cry New Dawn
1280x720 Low Preset
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	76 (58^min) fps
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	75 (58^min) fps -1%
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)	70 (50^min) fps -8%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G	64 (49^min) fps -16%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G	58 (46^min) fps -24%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	52 (36^min) fps -32%
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	49 (32^min) fps -36%
Geekom Mini IT12 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0	46 (28^min) fps -39%
1920x1080 High Preset
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	45 (37^min) fps +2%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	44 (37^min) fps
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)	40 (32^min) fps -9%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G	39 (31^min) fps -11%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G	36 (29^min) fps -18%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	28 (21^min) fps -36%
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	27 (20^min) fps -39%
Geekom Mini IT12 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0	25 (19^min) fps -43%

Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	161.5 (141.6^min) fps +1%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	159.7 (142.1^min) fps
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)	150.2 (132.8^min) fps -6%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G	136.8 (122.1^min) fps -14%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	113.8 (8.3^min) fps -29%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G	110.5 (93.1^min) fps -31%
Geekom Mini IT12 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0	108.1 (86.6^min) fps -32%
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	104.2 (79.7^min) fps -35%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	97.45 (86.9^min) fps +10%
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)	89.9 (78.3^min) fps +2%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	88.3 (74.1^min) fps
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G	85.3 (74.5^min) fps -3%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G	69.6 (59.3^min) fps -21%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	67.6 (58.9^min) fps -23%
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	61.7 (51.7^min) fps -30%
Geekom Mini IT12 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0	60.9 (55.7^min) fps -31%

F1 2020
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	201 (180^min) fps +2%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	197.3 (171^min) fps
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G	174.3 (162^min) fps -12%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G	152.2 (142^min) fps -23%
Geekom Mini IT12 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0	82.1 (73^min) fps -58%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	79.3 (67^min) fps +4%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	76.4 (67^min) fps
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G	67.2 (54^min) fps -12%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G	66.4 (56^min) fps -13%
Geekom Mini IT12 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0	33.5 (28^min) fps -56%

GRID Legends
1280x720 Low Preset
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	150.6 (52.6^min) fps +7%
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)	141.6 (6.33^min) fps 0%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	141.4 (2.69^min) fps
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G	129.9 (53.8^min) fps -8%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G	105.4 (1.237^min) fps -25%
Geekom Mini IT12 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0	64.1 (26.8^min) fps -55%
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	53.5 (25.6^min) fps -62%
1920x1080 High Preset
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	68.8 (34.8^min) fps +22%
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)	61 (4.49^min) fps +8%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	56.4 (21.6^min) fps
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G	51.9 (10^min) fps -8%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G	48.2 (2.63^min) fps -15%
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	27.1 (19.2^min) fps -52%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1280x720 Lowest Preset
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	109.2 fps +66%
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)	94.1 fps +43%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G	92.7 fps +41%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G	85.7 fps +30%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	65.9 fps
Geekom Mini IT12 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0	51.4 fps -22%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	45.5 fps -31%
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	43.7 fps -34%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	41.2 fps +76%
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)	36.3 fps +55%
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G	35.2 fps +50%
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro Radeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G	25.2 fps +8%
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	23.4 fps 0%
Geekom A8 Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000	23.4 fps
Khadas Mind Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	22.5 fps -4%
Geekom Mini IT12 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0	19.3 fps -18%

Witcher 3 FPS chart

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M: Ø23.3 (20-28)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core: Ø22.4 (21-24)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core: Ø22.8 (21-25)

Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø15 (13-16)

Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M: Ø25.7 (20-33)

Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M: Ø28.6 (27-30)

	basso	medio	alto	ultra
GTA V (2015)	166.9	159	64.7	24.9
The Witcher 3 (2015)	153.5	88.3	46.2	32.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	159.7	122.9	88.3	82.25
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	54.4	25.1	19.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	66.3	47.8	39.9
Far Cry 5 (2018)	88	49	42	41
Strange Brigade (2018)	74.1	66.9	56.9	49.2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	65.9	26.5	23.4	22.4
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	76	46	44	41
Metro Exodus (2019)	89.2	37.4	28.9	24.1
Borderlands 3 (2019)	102.5	42.8	27.8	24.3
F1 2020 (2020)	197.3	96.9	76.4	53.2
F1 2021 (2021)	216	104.9	80.9	34.9
God of War (2022)	24.7	19.5	15.2	11.3
GRID Legends (2022)	103.4	74.6	56.4	42
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	62	42.5	32.7	29.8
F1 22 (2022)	94.8	85.4	62.6
F1 23 (2023)	76	65.8	48.2
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	44	33.7	22.4	20.4
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024)		179.9	137.7	127.1

Geekom A8 con due eGPU nel test delle prestazioni

Geekom A8 offre una porta USB4, che ci permette di testare il mini-PC in combinazione con le nostre schede grafiche esterne. Abbiamo testato il dispositivo in combinazione con GPD G1, Razer Core X e Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Entrambe le soluzioni grafiche offrono prestazioni nettamente superiori rispetto all'iGPU del Geekom A8. Rispetto ad altri dispositivi, l'aumento delle prestazioni è di livello simile. C'è una piccola differenza con il GPD G1, che può offrire circa il dieci percento di prestazioni in più in combinazione con l'interfaccia OCuLink. Il Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti è dotato di tale interfaccia e funge da modello di riferimento nella panoramica di confronto.

Razer Core X con Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Geekom A8 e GPD G1 (AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT)

Performance Rating - Percent
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	99.7 pt
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	90.7 pt
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	90.6 pt
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	85.8 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	41824 Points +209%
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	34851 Points +158%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	33843 Points +150%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	27060 Points +100%
	13533 Points

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	10204 Points +252%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	9734 Points +236%
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	9703 Points +234%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9555 Points +229%
	2901 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	29101 Points +248%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	29015 Points +247%
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	28983 Points +247%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	28653 Points +243%
	8354 Points
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	6784 Points +211%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	6738 Points +209%
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6735 Points +208%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6704 Points +207%
	2184 Points
2560x1440 Speed Way Score
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1919 Points
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1857 Points
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1854 Points
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1837 Points
Night Raid Graphics Score
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	116677 Points
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	100948 Points
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	100529 Points
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	93268 Points

Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	19596 Points +83%
	10702 Points
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6929 Points -35%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6849 Points -36%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5014 Points -53%
1920x1080 1080p High
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	12194 Points +260%
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	7694 Points +127%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7660 Points +126%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5621 Points +66%
	3387 Points
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5799 Points +266%
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	5388 Points +240%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	5328 Points +236%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	4275 Points +170%
	1585 Points
3840x2160 4k Optimized
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7049 Points
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6056 Points
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6043 Points
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	4765 Points
7680x4320 8k Optimized
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2777 Points
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2770 Points
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2764 Points
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2764 Points

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	98.5 fps +416%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	96.5 fps +405%
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	96.2 fps +404%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	91.6 fps +380%
	19.1 fps
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	89.9 fps +491%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	81 fps +433%
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	80.5 fps +430%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	79.1 fps +420%
	15.2 fps

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	132.3 fps +385%
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	122.2 fps +348%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	121.7 fps +346%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	118.1 fps +333%
	27.3 fps
Extreme Preset DX11
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	130.8 fps +299%
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	129.9 fps +296%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	129.7 fps +295%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	123.2 fps +276%
	32.8 fps

ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	20490 Points +130%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	20386 Points +129%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	20340 Points +128%
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	20154 Points +126%
	8909 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1765 Points +259%
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1708 Points +247%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1703 Points +246%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1701 Points +246%
	492 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1797 Points +265%
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1760 Points +258%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	1754 Points +257%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1748 Points +255%
	492 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	4512 Points +92%
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	4457 Points +89%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	4450 Points +89%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	4300 Points +83%
	2356 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	5418 Points +131%
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	5375 Points +129%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5373 Points +129%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5356 Points +128%
	2345 Points
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7145 Points +122%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7122 Points +121%
Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	7114 Points +121%
Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6811 Points +111%
	3225 Points

	basso	medio	alto	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	176.8	171.4	146.1	83	62.7	70.5
The Witcher 3 (2015)	171.8	121.5	123.5	101	72.9	53.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	93.2	70.6	67.6	55.3		53.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	204	129.9	84.9		64.8	36.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	69.9	49.9	37.5			29.4
Far Cry 5 (2018)	115	95	93	85	80	51
Strange Brigade (2018)	237	179.1	166.7	152	109	61.3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	174.4	127.9	121.4	102.7	64.3	27.8
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	108	78	74	65	63	53
Metro Exodus (2019)	76	46.3	48	41.6	38.9	20
Borderlands 3 (2019)	104.7	93.1	84.6	75.3	59.4	31.9
F1 2020 (2020)	290	193	162.6	113.4	90.6	56.5
F1 2021 (2021)	278	225	151.2	86	64.3	33.4
Far Cry 6 (2021)	97.9	85.6	74.3	58.7	56.7
God of War (2022)	76.5	75.9	74.3	66.1	53	34.1
GRID Legends (2022)	108.1	87.1	68.3	61.2	56.5	44.5
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	171.7	129.1	88.7	72.8	50.6	27.8
F1 22 (2022)	121.7	115.9	90.1	42.2	29.3
F1 23 (2023)	127.6	139.3	114.6	31.7	15.8
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	89.2	75.8	65.4	59.7	40.3	18.7
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023)	79	72	66	53	42	27
Total War Pharaoh (2023)	278.3	158.7	107.2	83.5	60.3	32.5
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023)	38	34	20	19	12
Skull & Bones (2024)	84	76	62	50	39	24

Geekom A8 e Razer Core X (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti)

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	99.6 pt
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	99.3 pt
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	97.4 pt
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	95.7 pt
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	95 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	34990 Points +159%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	34666 Points +156%
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	33282 Points +146%
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	32915 Points +143%
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	32835 Points +143%
	13533 Points

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	11210 Points +286%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	11182 Points +285%
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	11012 Points +280%
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10777 Points +271%
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10743 Points +270%
	2901 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	25894 Points +210%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	25462 Points +205%
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	25163 Points +201%
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	24905 Points +198%
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	24657 Points +195%
	8354 Points
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	7114 Points +226%
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	7076 Points +224%
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	7061 Points +223%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7044 Points +223%
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	6977 Points +219%
	2184 Points
2560x1440 Speed Way Score
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2868 Points
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2859 Points
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	2806 Points
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2761 Points
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2756 Points
Night Raid Graphics Score
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	112660 Points
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	110651 Points
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	102443 Points
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	100574 Points
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	97348 Points

Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	34424 Points +222%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	33894 Points +217%
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	28935 Points +170%
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	27744 Points +159%
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	27313 Points +155%
	10702 Points
1920x1080 1080p High
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	15076 Points +345%
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	14964 Points +342%
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	14936 Points +341%
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	14751 Points +336%
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	14660 Points +333%
	3387 Points
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	7146 Points +351%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7055 Points +345%
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	7036 Points +344%
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	7024 Points +343%
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	6971 Points +340%
	1585 Points
3840x2160 4k Optimized
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	9335 Points
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	9205 Points
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	9193 Points
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	9173 Points
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	9039 Points
7680x4320 8k Optimized
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	4061 Points
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	4050 Points
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	4013 Points
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	3995 Points
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	3966 Points

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	141.6 fps +641%
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	141.5 fps +641%
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	139.8 fps +632%
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	131.7 fps +590%
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	131.4 fps +588%
	19.1 fps
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	137.5 fps +805%
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	137 fps +801%
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	125.7 fps +727%
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	122.2 fps +704%
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	121.1 fps +697%
	15.2 fps

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	174.9 fps +541%
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	174.4 fps +539%
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	169 fps +519%
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	167.3 fps +513%
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	163.2 fps +498%
	27.3 fps
Extreme Preset DX11
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	164.9 fps +403%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	163.2 fps +398%
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	161.9 fps +394%
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	154.3 fps +370%
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	152.4 fps +365%
	32.8 fps

ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	27998 Points +214%
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	27929 Points +213%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	27929 Points +213%
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	27847 Points +213%
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	27460 Points +208%
	8909 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2697 Points +448%
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2691 Points +447%
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	2689 Points +447%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2687 Points +446%
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2667 Points +442%
	492 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2622 Points +433%
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2622 Points +433%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2622 Points +433%
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	2621 Points +433%
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2598 Points +428%
	492 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	5776 Points +145%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	5742 Points +144%
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	5738 Points +144%
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5689 Points +141%
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5606 Points +138%
	2356 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6325 Points +170%
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	6317 Points +169%
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	6306 Points +169%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6283 Points +168%
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	6202 Points +164%
	2345 Points
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	10594 Points +228%
Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	10578 Points +228%
Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) Intel Core i7-1260P	10564 Points +228%
Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10539 Points +227%
Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10388 Points +222%
	3225 Points

	basso	medio	alto	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	184.6	180	171.6	107.6	94.5	101.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)	256	174.9	130.4	65.6	57.2	68
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	176.7	160.6	153.2	142		112.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	216	146.3	100.1		79	48.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	140.5	124.3	95			80.6
Far Cry 5 (2018)	159	137	131	122	100	59
Strange Brigade (2018)	236	187.1	177.7	166	133.7	84.6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	154.5	121.1	118.1	112.1	91	46.6
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	134	117	112	101	92	60
Metro Exodus (2019)	138	89.5	67.7	51.2	44.9	33.4
Borderlands 3 (2019)	139.6	124.1	103.2	85	65.5	38.7
F1 2020 (2020)	231	140.8	139	110.1	94.1	61.4
F1 2021 (2021)	162	126.8	80.8	60.6	54.3	46.5
Far Cry 6 (2021)	82.7	70.9	59.9	51.9	50.1
God of War (2022)	113.1	99.9	83.8	62.9	56.9	40.4
GRID Legends (2022)	126	97.5	81.6	69.3	63	50.5
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	177.6	140.4	100.7	81.8	62	36.3
F1 22 (2022)	71.7	65	50.8	32.2	30.5
F1 23 (2023)	80.3	80.5	63	40	34.4	15.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	110.1	90.4	78.2	78.3	60.7	37
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	96.6	81.2	71.5	63.5	44.4	22.3
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023)	89	82	79	61	53	33
Total War Pharaoh (2023)	302.4	176.2	104.3	79	63.2	39.3
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023)	68	64	55	42	30	11
Skull & Bones (2024)	84	78	69	53	47	31
F1 24 (2024)	88.1	84.5	69.8	46.1	35.3	15.5

Emissioni

Emissioni di rumore

Il Geekom A8 è un mini-PC estremamente compatto, il che significa che nel dispositivo può essere alloggiata solo un'unità di raffreddamento molto piccola. Senza carico, il dispositivo funziona in modo quasi silenzioso ed è appena udibile. Tuttavia, questo cambia sotto carico. Detto questo, non notiamo una grande differenza tra il carico medio e quello massimo, il che significa che il Geekom A8 è rapidamente udibile anche a basso carico. Al suo picco, abbiamo misurato un livello di pressione sonora di poco superiore a 49 dB(A). Solo il Acemagic F2A ha raggiunto valori altrettanto elevati nel nostro test, mentre il Geekom A7 è significativamente più silenzioso sotto carico.

Rumorosità

Idle		24.5 / 24.7 / 24.7 dB(A)
Sotto carico		48.5 / 49.2 dB(A)

	30 dB silenzioso 40 dB(A) udibile 50 dB(A) rumoroso
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm di distanza) Rumorosità ambientale: 24.4 dB(A)

	Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
Noise		-2%	-1%	-3%	-12%	-5%	-7%
off /ambiente *	24.4	24.1 1%	24.9 -2%	25.4 -4%	25.4 -4%	25.4 -4%	24.8 -2%
Idle Minimum *	24.5	29.8 -22%	25.4 -4%	28 -14%	33.3 -36%	27.5 -12%	31 -27%
Idle Average *	24.7	29.9 -21%	25.7 -4%	28.1 -14%	33.6 -36%	28 -13%	31.2 -26%
Idle Maximum *	24.7	30 -21%	25.7 -4%	28.5 -15%	33.7 -36%	33 -34%	31.4 -27%
Load Average *	48.5	37.3 23%	47.8 1%	39.6 18%	43.3 11%	42.8 12%	37.1 24%
Witcher 3 ultra *	47	40.2 14%	45.23 4%	47.2 -0%	43.2 8%	44.5 5%	37.6 20%
Load Maximum *	49.2	43.5 12%	49 -0%	44.2 10%	43.3 12%	44.9 9%	53.7 -9%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Temperatura

L'involucro in alluminio del Geekom A8 si riscalda notevolmente quando è al minimo. Tuttavia, questo non è un problema, anche se la temperatura aumenta solo minimamente sotto carico. Le temperature superficiali a volte scendono addirittura, il che indica che la ventola non funziona quasi mai al minimo e quindi si accumula più calore nel dispositivo stesso.

L'AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS si riscalda fino a 85,5 °C durante lo stress test. Non si tratta di un valore critico, soprattutto perché si verifica solo per un breve periodo. Su un periodo più lungo, la temperatura della CPU si stabilizza a poco meno di 77 °C. Con 35 watt, il SoC funziona secondo le specifiche del produttore.

Geekom A8 in modalità idle (parte anteriore)

Test di stress del Geekom A8 (parte anteriore)

Carico massimo

Idle


39.2 °C	41.9 °C	41.5 °C
35.6 °C	38.6 °C	36.3 °C
33.4 °C	34.9 °C	34.5 °C

Massima: 41.9 °C
Media: 37.3 °C


37 °C	36.8 °C	36.2 °C
32 °C	39.9 °C	33.2 °C
35.1 °C	34.2 °C	31.9 °C

Massima: 39.9 °C
Media: 35.1 °C

Alimentazione (max) 47 °C | Temperatura della stanza 22.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)

(±) La temperatura media del lato superiore sotto carico massimo e' di 37.3 °C / 99 F, rispetto alla media di 32.3 °C / 90 F per i dispositivi di questa classe Mini PC.
(±) La temperatura massima sul lato superiore è di 41.9 °C / 107 F, rispetto alla media di 35.8 °C / 96 F, che varia da 24 a 69.5 °C per questa classe Mini PC.
(+) Il lato inferiore si riscalda fino ad un massimo di 39.9 °C / 104 F, rispetto alla media di 36.1 °C / 97 F
(-) In idle, la temperatura media del lato superiore è di 38.6 °C / 101 F, rispetto alla media deld ispositivo di 32.3 °C / 90 F.

Consumo di energia

Il fabbisogno energetico e l'efficienza che ne deriva sono un punto di forza del Geekom A8. Abbiamo già visto questa tendenza nel Geekom A7. Entrambi i modelli sono molto vicini l'uno all'altro. Soprattutto in modalità idle, il Geekom può vantare un basso consumo energetico. Sotto carico medio, abbiamo documentato 71 watt per il nostro dispositivo di prova. Il Geekom A8 raggiunge il valore di picco di 93,2 watt solo per un breve periodo. L'alimentazione è fornita da un piccolo alimentatore da 120 watt.

Consumo di corrente

Off / Standby	1.4 / 2.7 Watt
Idle	3.2 / 4.9 / 6.8 Watt
Sotto carico	71.3 / 93.2 Watt


Leggenda: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	Media AMD Radeon 780M	Media della classe Mini PC
Power Consumption		-78%	-80%	-57%	-3%	-117%	-96%	-35%	-92%
Idle Minimum *	3.2	8.2 -156%	9.1 -184%	5.7 -78%	3.8 -19%	12.1 -278%	9.8 -206%	6.11 ?(2.7 - 14, n=51) -91%	9.69 ?(1.9 - 45.7, n=121, ultimi 2 anni) -203%
Idle Average *	4.9	12.1 -147%	10.3 -110%	9.5 -94%	4.8 2%	13.2 -169%	11.5 -135%	8.32 ?(4.7 - 17.6, n=51) -70%	11.9 ?(1.9 - 47.5, n=119, ultimi 2 anni) -143%
Idle Maximum *	6.8	14 -106%	14.4 -112%	16.5 -143%	6.5 4%	14.1 -107%	15.3 -125%	10.6 ?(5.2 - 27, n=51) -56%	15.2 ?(2.6 - 57.1, n=121, ultimi 2 anni) -124%
Load Average *	71.3	53.1 26%	54.9 23%	53.3 25%	71.9 -1%	82.9 -16%	75.3 -6%	56.1 ?(19.7 - 93.2, n=50) 21%	59 ?(11.3 - 170.6, n=121, ultimi 2 anni) 17%
Load Maximum *	93.2	100.4 -8%	110.4 -18%	87.8 6%	94.7 -2%	106.8 -15%	102.8 -10%	74.9 ?(34.9 - 111.8, n=51) 20%	100.5 ?(18.1 - 423, n=121, ultimi 2 anni) -8%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Power consumption with the external monitor

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.93 (3.89-6.83)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10.4 (9.08-14.4)

Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.81 (3.82-6.48)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø67.5 (54.1-87.8)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø48.4 (45.6-52.4)

Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø73.1 (66.4-82.2)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø69.9 (55.2-93.2)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø92.2 (78.7-114)

Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø64.2 (55.6-95.8)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø71.3 (62.5-83.3)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø54.9 (50.2-57)

Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø71.9 (56.1-82.9)

Power consumption with the external monitor

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø72.5 (69.7-93.2)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø99.6 (92-110.4)

Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø70 (57.2-94.7)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø73.7 (64.4-85.7)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103 (99.2-107)

Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø73 (64.8-85.1)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø29.6 (24.6-64.4)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø32.7 (19.4-55.3)

Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø28.7 (24.1-75.1)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø66.8 (64.3-85.9)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø100.7 (97.2-108.6)

Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø66.2 (63.5-84.2)

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø71.9 (63.7-91)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø49.7 (47.3-60.6)

Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø72.8 (57.4-85.5)

Pro

+ alloggiamento da 0,5L estremamente compatto e robusto

+ scelta di materiali di alta qualità

+ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS con 8 core e 16 threads

+ iGPU moderna e potente con architettura RDNA3

+ rAM veloce (DDR5-5600 MT/s)

+ numerose opzioni di connessione, tra cui USB4

+ è possibile utilizzare contemporaneamente un massimo di quattro schermi

+ consumo energetico relativamente basso

+ generoso SSD con 2 TB di spazio di archiviazione

+ Lettore di schede SD con supporto UHS

+ garanzia di 36 mesi

Contro

- l'unità di raffreddamento lavora rapidamente al limite

- chiaramente udibile sotto carico

- piedini in gomma incollati

- latenze DPC elevate

Verdetto - Tanta potenza in una minuscola valigetta da 0,5l

Il Geekom A8 in recensione: fornito da Geekom

Il Geekom A8 è un PC estremamente compatto - con un volume di soli 0,5 litri, il Geekom A8 ha prestazioni straordinarie. Il AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS è in grado di dimostrare costantemente un'elevata velocità di lavoro. Con 32 GB di RAM DDR5 e un disco rigido da 2 TB, è ben equipaggiato per il momento. Tuttavia, a causa del design compatto, il SoC può essere utilizzato solo con un consumo energetico minimo. Tuttavia, il Geekom è in grado di svolgere le attività quotidiane senza problemi. In un confronto diretto con il Geekom A7, l'A8 non è all'altezza.

Il Geekom A8 si basa sullo stesso design del Geekom A7. L'alloggiamento, realizzato in modo eccellente, non solo è visivamente di alta qualità, ma ha anche una sensazione convincente. Semmai, il processo di smontaggio è degno di critica. Tuttavia, dato che Geekom vende sempre l'A8 preconfigurato, questo aspetto può essere trascurato. In alternativa al modello Ryzen 9, il Geekom A8 può essere ordinato anche con il Ryzen 7 8845HS (799 euro). In questo modo si risparmia un po' di denaro, anche se le prestazioni non dovrebbero essere sensibilmente peggiori. Tuttavia, dovrà fare una scelta per quanto riguarda la configurazione dell'SSD, in quanto Geekom offre solo il modello Ryzen 7 con un SSD da 1 TB.

Il Geekom A8 è un mini-PC elegante con prestazioni eccellenti. Grazie all'eccellente lavorazione e alla scelta di materiali di alta qualità, il Geekom A8 è un mini-PC di classe superiore.

Non c'è nulla di cui lamentarsi quando si tratta della selezione di interfacce esterne. La piccola centrale informatica offre un'ampia gamma di opzioni di connessione e, con l'USB4, un'interfaccia moderna al top che può ampliare la gamma di applicazioni. Se le prestazioni della veloce iGPU aka AMD Radeon 780M non sono sufficienti, il Geekom A8 può essere trasformato in un potente PC da gioco con una scheda grafica esterna.

In termini di design, Geekom A8 e Geekom A7 sono tra i mini-PC più belli che abbiamo testato finora. Tuttavia, il design compatto causa anche alcuni problemi e limitazioni. Ad esempio, le connessioni esterne sono molto vicine nella parte posteriore. Il livello di rumore sotto carico è un altro punto critico. Ci sarebbe piaciuto vedere un'unità di raffreddamento leggermente meglio calibrata da parte del produttore.

Prezzo e disponibilità

Il Geekom A8 costa attualmente 949 euro (1.030 dollari) nella versione da noi recensita. I clienti possono ordinare il mini-PC direttamente da il produttore. Altrimenti, il Geekom A8 può essere ordinato anche tramite Amazon.

Geekom A8 - 05/24/2024 v7 ^(old)
Sebastian Bade

Chassis

87 / 98 → 89%

Connettività

62 / 81 → 77%

Peso

84%

Prestazioni di gioco

76%

Prestazioni Applicazioni

97%

Workstation

79%

Temperatura

86%

Rumorosità

81%

Media

82%

85%

Mini PC - Media ponderata

Articoli collegati

Geekom A8 (A Serie)

recensione

•

Recensione del Geekom A7 con case da 0,5l: Mini-PC premium con AMD Ryzen 9 ...

recensione

•

Recensione del Geekom A5: Un mini PC rosa, alternativa al NUC con APU AMD R...

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.