Notebookcheck Logo

Asus Zephyrus M15 GU502LU vs. GU502LW: dov'è la differenza?

Modalità Turbo e Modalità Performance.

La modalità Turbo fa la differenza se si vuole massimizzare le prestazioni di uno dei due dispositivi. Andiamo oltre a ciò che gli utenti possono aspettarsi dalle serie gaming di fascia media di Asus.
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 (ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502 Serie)
Processore
Intel Core i7-10750H 6 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Scheda grafica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 1455 MHz, Memoria: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 456.55, Optimus
Memoria
16 GB 
, 8 GB soldered + 8 GB DDR4-3200 SODIMM slot, Dual-Channel
Schermo
15.60 pollici 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Panda LM156LF-2F01, IPS, NCP004D, lucido: no, 144 Hz
Scheda madre
Intel HM470
Harddisk
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, 512 GB 
Scheda audio
Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS
Porte di connessione
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen 2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: 3.5 mm microphone, 3.5 mm headphones
Rete
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Dimensioni
altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 18.9 x 360 x 252
Batteria
76 Wh polimeri di litio
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Altre caratteristiche
Tastiera: Chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, Armoury Crate, 12 Mesi Garanzia
Peso
2.045 kg, Alimentazione: 722 gr
Prezzo
1400 USD
Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

 

Punteggio
Data
Modello
Peso
Altezza
Dimensione
Risoluzione
Miglior Prezzo
82.1 %
v7 (old)
10/2020
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
2 kg18.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.5 %
v7 (old)
10/2020
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2 kg18.9 mm15.60"3840x2160
82.1 %
v7 (old)
09/2020
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
2.1 kg32 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.1 %
v7 (old)
10/2020
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2 kg19.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.3 %
v7 (old)
07/2020
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.5 kg26.1 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.2 %
v7 (old)
05/2020
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
2.3 kg27.5 mm15.60"1920x1080
358 mm 240 mm 32 mm 2.1 kg363.1 mm 259.6 mm 26.1 mm 2.5 kg357.7 mm 248 mm 27.5 mm 2.3 kg359.8 mm 245.8 mm 19.9 mm 2 kg360 mm 252 mm 18.9 mm 2 kg360 mm 252 mm 18.9 mm 2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1427 (808min - 1646max) MBit/s +68%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1166 (600min - 1337max) MBit/s +37%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1130 MBit/s +33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
849 (573min - 993max) MBit/s
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
610 (562min - 651max) MBit/s -28%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
566 (37min - 647max) MBit/s -33%
iperf3 receive AX12
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1450 (738min - 1579max) MBit/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1370 MBit/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1370 (1305min - 1430max) MBit/s
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1314 (949min - 1439max) MBit/s -4%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
905 (709min - 946max) MBit/s -34%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
880 (772min - 916max) MBit/s -36%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1369 (1305-1430)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø849 (573-993)
270.4
cd/m²
264.9
cd/m²
262.3
cd/m²
251.5
cd/m²
282.5
cd/m²
244.2
cd/m²
252.1
cd/m²
264.7
cd/m²
248
cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità
Panda LM156LF-2F01 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Massima: 282.5 cd/m² (Nits) Media: 260.1 cd/m² Minimum: 15.29 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 86 %
Al centro con la batteria: 282.5 cd/m²
Contrasto: 831:1 (Nero: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.75
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.32% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Panda LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
LGD05FE, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK
BOE NV156FHM-NX1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
BOE CQ NV156FHM-NX1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB3, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display
73%
0%
-1%
60%
Display P3 Coverage
39.32
69.4
77%
39.86
1%
38.8
-1%
63.5
61%
sRGB Coverage
59.1
99
68%
58.4
-1%
57.8
-2%
94.4
60%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
40.65
70.5
73%
41.18
1%
40.09
-1%
65.1
60%
Response Times
-66%
46%
-15%
17%
57%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
26 ?(11.2, 14.8)
60 ?(29.2, 30.8)
-131%
17 ?(9, 8)
35%
38.4 ?(18.8, 19.6)
-48%
26 ?(12, 14)
-0%
10.4 ?(6.4, 4)
60%
Response Time Black / White *
25.6 ?(14.8, 10.8)
25.6 ?(11.6, 14)
-0%
11 ?(7, 4)
57%
20.8 ?(10.8, 10)
19%
17 ?(8, 9)
34%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
53%
PWM Frequency
Screen
59%
30%
-16%
4%
21%
Brightness middle
282.5
387
37%
314
11%
296.3
5%
301
7%
384.9
36%
Brightness
260
377
45%
293
13%
284
9%
277
7%
358
38%
Brightness Distribution
86
90
5%
87
1%
84
-2%
77
-10%
87
1%
Black Level *
0.34
0.23
32%
0.22
35%
0.38
-12%
0.26
24%
0.67
-97%
Contrast
831
1683
103%
1427
72%
780
-6%
1158
39%
574
-31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.89
1.8
63%
2.51
49%
6.56
-34%
5.12
-5%
2.43
50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
17.46
3.94
77%
4.42
75%
21.81
-25%
8.86
49%
4.58
74%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.75
0.7
85%
1.71
64%
5.34
-12%
4.88
-3%
2.03
57%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
2.9
-32%
3.26
-48%
4.4
-100%
3.47
-58%
2.6
-18%
Gamma
2.14 103%
2.178 101%
2.42 91%
2.22 99%
2.37 93%
2.2 100%
CCT
6850 95%
6992 93%
6150 106%
6716 97%
7062 92%
6981 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37.2
99
166%
37.3
0%
37
-1%
59.7
60%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
58.5
99
69%
57.6
-2%
57
-3%
93.9
61%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
22% / 46%
38% / 33%
-10% / -13%
7% / 5%
46% / 33%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti possono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con tempi di risposta bassi.
       Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
25.6 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 14.8 ms Incremento
↘ 10.8 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.1 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 58 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (20.9 ms).
       Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
26 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato↗ 11.2 ms Incremento
↘ 14.8 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers.
In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.165 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 32 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore.
Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono migliori rispettto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (32.8 ms).

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Per ridurre la luminosità dello schermo, alcuni portatili accendono e spengono la retroilluminazione in rapida successione - un metodo chiamato Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Questa frequenza di ciclo a livello ideale non dovrebbe essere percepibile dall'occhi umano. Se tale frequenza è troppo bassa, gli utenti con occhi sensibili potrebbero stancarsi gli occhi o avere mal di testa o anche notare uno sfarfallio.
flickering dello schermo / PWM non rilevato

In confronto: 53 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 8705 (minimo: 5 - massimo: 343500) Hz è stata rilevata.

07014021028035042049056063070077084091098010501120119012601330Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1337 (1319.7-1347.21)
Aorus 5 KB GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1145 (1045.12-1193.85)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1226 (1200.59-1340.53)
Dell G3 15 3500-G4DG2 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1119 (1067.81-1225.19)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
6181 Points +90%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
3956 Points +21%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
3907 Points +20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3871 Points +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
3869 Points +19%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
3795 Points +16%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
3505 Points +7%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3271 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Core i7-10750H
3261 Points
Media Intel Core i7-10750H
  (1749 - 3325, n=43)
2848 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
2410 Points -26%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
493 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
490 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
482 Points +5%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
479 Points +4%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
477 Points +3%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
474 Points +3%
Media Intel Core i7-10750H
  (431 - 504, n=43)
473 Points +3%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
467 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Core i7-10750H
461 Points
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
436 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
421 Points -9%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
2513 (2424.1min - 2512.72max) Points +87%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1821 Points +35%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1741 (1664.03min - 1741.33max) Points +29%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1733 (1604.75min - 1733.1max) Points +29%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
1664 (1603.72min - 1663.62max) Points +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
1634 (1595.85min - 1741.4max) Points +21%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
1623 Points +20%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1418 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Core i7-10750H
1347 (1319.7min - 1347.21max) Points
Media Intel Core i7-10750H
  (804 - 1418, n=50)
1263 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
1156 (1010.13min - 1155.97max) Points -14%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
211 Points +10%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
206 Points +8%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
202 Points +6%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
198 Points +4%
Media Intel Core i7-10750H
  (184 - 213, n=45)
196.7 Points +3%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
192 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Core i7-10750H
191 Points
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
186 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
186 Points -3%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
176 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
174 Points -9%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
527 Seconds * -58%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
450 Seconds * -35%
Media Intel Core i7-10750H
  (322 - 587, n=43)
389 Seconds * -17%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
337.2 Seconds * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Core i7-10750H
333 Seconds *
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
284 Seconds * +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
284 Seconds * +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
279 Seconds * +16%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
261 Seconds * +22%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
179 Seconds * +46%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5525 MIPS +10%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
5367 MIPS +7%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
5349 MIPS +6%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
5114 MIPS +2%
Media Intel Core i7-10750H
  (4504 - 5470, n=43)
5114 MIPS +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Core i7-10750H
5031 MIPS
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
4655 MIPS -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
4622 MIPS -8%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4584 MIPS -9%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4414 MIPS -12%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
67252 MIPS +83%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
48392 MIPS +32%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
47941 MIPS +30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
47806 MIPS +30%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
47520 MIPS +29%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
43805 MIPS +19%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
37625 MIPS +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Core i7-10750H
36792 MIPS
Media Intel Core i7-10750H
  (26040 - 37345, n=43)
33946 MIPS -8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
33899 MIPS -8%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1368 Points +12%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
1336 Points +9%
Media Intel Core i7-10750H
  (1114 - 1333, n=43)
1263 Points +3%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
1242 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Core i7-10750H
1225 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
1188 Points -3%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1154 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
1141 Points -7%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1116 Points -9%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
10725 Points +70%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8586 Points +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
7682 Points +22%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
7583 Points +20%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
7453 Points +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Core i7-10750H
6308 Points
Media Intel Core i7-10750H
  (4443 - 6674, n=43)
6135 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
6068 Points -4%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
5739 Points -9%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
19.8 fps +83%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
13.5 fps +25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
13 fps +20%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
12.35 fps +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
12 fps +11%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
11.7 fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.8 fps
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
10.4 fps -4%
Media Intel Core i7-10750H
  (5.54 - 11.6, n=43)
9.61 fps -11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
9.1 fps -16%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
93.9 s * -96%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
73.3 s * -53%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
56.7 s * -18%
Media Intel Core i7-10750H
  (43.1 - 99.2, n=43)
53.3 s * -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
48.4 s * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Core i7-10750H
48 s *
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
47.1 s * +2%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
46.2 s * +4%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
0.664 sec * -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.616 sec *
Media Intel Core i7-10750H
  (0.578 - 0.708, n=42)
0.611 sec * +1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
0.61 sec * +1%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.597 sec * +3%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.597 sec * +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
0.58 sec * +6%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K
0.567 sec * +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.565 sec * +8%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1347 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
141 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
191 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3261 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
461 Points
Aiuto
PCMark 10
Score
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6254 Points +19%
Media Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (5241 - 5594, n=3)
5425 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5241 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
5208 Points -1%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5127 Points -2%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Phison PS5013 PM8256GPTCB4B8TF
4987 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
4887 Points -7%
Essentials
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
10017 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
9793 Points
Media Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (9543 - 9793, n=3)
9683 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
9008 Points -8%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
8443 Points -14%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Phison PS5013 PM8256GPTCB4B8TF
8378 Points -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
8351 Points -15%
Productivity
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8458 Points
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8193 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
8058 Points -5%
Media Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (7382 - 8458, n=3)
7846 Points -7%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
7681 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
7235 Points -14%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Phison PS5013 PM8256GPTCB4B8TF
7119 Points -16%
Digital Content Creation
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8088 Points +72%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
6345 Points +35%
Media Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (4716 - 6354, n=3)
5758 Points +22%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Phison PS5013 PM8256GPTCB4B8TF
5644 Points +20%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5640 Points +20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4716 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
4366 Points -7%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
4853 Points +9%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4516 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4463 Points
Media Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  ()
4463 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
3984 Points -11%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Phison PS5013 PM8256GPTCB4B8TF
3702 Points -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
3409 Points -24%
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5894 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5764 Points
Media Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  ()
5764 Points 0%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5507 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
5319 Points -8%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Phison PS5013 PM8256GPTCB4B8TF
4986 Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
4396 Points -24%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4463 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5764 punti
PCMark 10 Score
5241 punti
Aiuto
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
3178 μs * -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
2697 μs *
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Phison PS5013 PM8256GPTCB4B8TF
1654 μs * +39%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
1481 μs * +45%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
1172 μs * +57%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
723 μs * +73%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK
Phison PS5013 PM8256GPTCB4B8TF
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
AS SSD
53%
109%
11%
37%
148%
Seq Read
1198
2523
111%
2053
71%
1592
33%
2012
68%
2066
72%
Seq Write
676
1578
133%
2562
279%
1057
56%
1261
87%
2418
258%
4K Read
48.09
50.4
5%
42.46
-12%
34.12
-29%
43.66
-9%
54.2
13%
4K Write
112.7
115.6
3%
97.2
-14%
120.4
7%
109.3
-3%
129
14%
4K-64 Read
323.1
634
96%
1414
338%
410.1
27%
851
163%
1865
477%
4K-64 Write
790
1114
41%
1471
86%
634
-20%
780
-1%
1878
138%
Access Time Read *
0.067
0.095
-42%
0.079
-18%
0.072
-7%
0.117
-75%
0.042
37%
Access Time Write *
0.14
0.038
73%
0.039
72%
0.105
25%
0.036
74%
0.091
35%
Score Read
491
936
91%
1662
238%
613
25%
1096
123%
2126
333%
Score Write
970
1388
43%
1825
88%
860
-11%
1016
5%
2249
132%
Score Total
1704
2770
63%
4364
156%
1771
4%
2643
55%
5482
222%
Copy ISO MB/s
898
2106
135%
1913
113%
1255
40%
1481
65%
2927
226%
Copy Program MB/s
523
549
5%
833
59%
508
-3%
467.5
-11%
728
39%
Copy Game MB/s
948
854
-10%
1667
76%
986
4%
734
-23%
1614
70%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
43%
46%
21%
17%
63%
Write 4K
126.2
123
-3%
120
-5%
170.2
35%
145.4
15%
145
15%
Read 4K
52.9
52.5
-1%
36.09
-32%
52.5
-1%
51.6
-2%
46.84
-11%
Write Seq
934
1698
82%
1778
90%
1105
18%
1007
8%
2377
154%
Read Seq
1524
2440
60%
1362
-11%
1507
-1%
1145
-25%
2185
43%
Write 4K Q32T1
423.4
450.4
6%
429.1
1%
380.8
-10%
468.4
11%
463.5
9%
Read 4K Q32T1
338.3
550
63%
493.2
46%
531
57%
528
56%
527
56%
Write Seq Q32T1
960
1794
87%
2936
206%
1253
31%
1381
44%
2395
149%
Read Seq Q32T1
1832
2812
53%
3227
76%
2543
39%
2291
25%
3470
89%
Write 4K Q8T8
1536
Read 4K Q8T8
1490
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)
48% / 50%
78% / 87%
16% / 15%
27% / 30%
106% / 117%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1832 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 960 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 338.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 423.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1524 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 934 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 52.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 126.2 MB/s

Throttling Disco: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
21237 Points +29%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
18807 Points +14%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H
18169 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H
17321 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
16488 Points
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
15913 Points -3%
Media NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (14186 - 16488, n=24)
14867 Points -10%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
14394 Points -13%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
11332 Points -31%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
10663 Points -35%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H
10550 Points -36%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
9428 Points -43%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
8171 Points +33%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H
7006 Points +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H
6627 Points +8%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
6312 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
6123 Points
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
6059 Points -1%
Media NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (5335 - 6123, n=22)
5653 Points -8%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
4548 Points -26%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
3841 Points -37%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
3626 Points -41%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
3568 Points -42%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H
3539 Points -42%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
7688 Points +23%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H
6909 Points +10%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
6610 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H
6604 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
6261 Points
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
6154 Points -2%
Media NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (4946 - 6261, n=21)
5717 Points -9%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
4396 Points -30%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
4131 Points -34%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H
3872 Points -38%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
3795 Points -39%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
3559 Points -43%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
28997 Points +28%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
25706 Points +13%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H
23335 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
22670 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H
22516 Points -1%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
20723 Points -9%
Media NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (18610 - 22670, n=24)
20096 Points -11%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
18205 Points -20%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H
14437 Points -36%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
14231 Points -37%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
13575 Points -40%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
12620 Points -44%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H
13167 Points +1%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
13126 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
13061 Points
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
12993 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H
12942 Points -1%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
12078 Points -8%
Media NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (9500 - 13311, n=23)
12019 Points -8%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H
11620 Points -11%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
11561 Points -11%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
7573 Points -42%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
6839 Points -48%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
6838 Points -48%
3DMark 11 Performance
19342 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
38136 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score
14649 punti
3DMark Time Spy Score
6261 punti
Aiuto
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 High Quality
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
107 fps +67%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
79.7 fps +25%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
66.1 fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
63.9 fps
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
60 fps -6%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
59.9 fps -6%
Media NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (55.4 - 63.9, n=5)
59 fps -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
54.6 fps -15%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5300M
29.3 (8min) fps -54%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
140 fps +60%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
87.6 fps
Media NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (78.1 - 87.6, n=5)
81.5 fps -7%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
81.4 fps -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
74.1 fps -15%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
74 fps -16%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5300M
51.6 (42min) fps -41%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
223.2 (201min - 258max) fps +90%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
168 (155min - 175max) fps +43%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
160.8 (152min - 177max) fps +37%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
155.8 fps +32%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
152.3 fps +30%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
142 fps +21%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
142 (114min) fps +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
127.4 fps +8%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
124.8 fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
117.6 (107min - 128max) fps
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
117.4 fps 0%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
111 (96min - 121max) fps -6%
Media NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (93 - 120.4, n=17)
104.7 fps -11%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
104 (92min - 111max) fps -12%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
103.6 (92min - 110max) fps -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
94.5 (85min - 105max) fps -20%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
90.3 fps -23%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
76.1 (71min - 80max) fps -35%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
70.9 fps -40%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
68.9 fps -41%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
62.7 fps -47%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5300M
60 (48min) fps -49%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
113.2 (106min - 129max) fps +74%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
85.7 (80min - 91max) fps +32%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
82.1 (77min - 86max) fps +26%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
80.6 fps +24%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
80.3 fps +23%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
78.4 fps +20%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
76.3 (64min) fps +17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
74.4 (62min) fps +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
70.7 fps +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
68.3 fps +5%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
67 (55min) fps +3%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
66.1 (62min - 70max) fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
65.1 (62min - 69max) fps
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
63.3 fps -3%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
63.2 (57min - 69max) fps -3%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
57 (47min) fps -12%
Media NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (51.6 - 65.1, n=21)
56.2 fps -14%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
54.2 (46min - 63max) fps -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
51.3 (47min - 56max) fps -21%
Dell G3 15 3500-G4DG2
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
50.6 fps -22%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
50.2 fps -23%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
40.1 (37min - 44max) fps -38%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
40 fps -39%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
39.8 (28min) fps -39%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5300M
38.3 (31min) fps -41%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
36.2 fps -44%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
158 (136.4min) fps +27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
135 (100.8min) fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
130 (113.1min) fps +5%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
128 (111.7min) fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
124 (107.1min) fps
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
122.1 (104.7min) fps -2%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
122 (105.4min) fps -2%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
121 (106.1min) fps -2%
Media NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (103.3 - 130, n=11)
119.8 fps -3%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
119 (104.2min) fps -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
118.8 (104.4min) fps -4%
Dell G3 15 3500-G4DG2
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
117 (102.5min) fps -6%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
111 (95.8min) fps -10%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
106 (91.5min) fps -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
106 (92.9min) fps -15%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5300M
97.9 (85.2min) fps -21%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
93.3 (84.6min) fps -25%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
148 (127.7min) fps +25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
129 (110.1min) fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
122 (104.6min) fps +3%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
120 (104.9min) fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
118 (100.3min) fps
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
117.1 (100.9min) fps -1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
115 (98.5min) fps -3%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
115 (100min) fps -3%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
113.6 (100min) fps -4%
Media NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (94.6 - 125, n=11)
113.6 fps -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
113.1 (100min) fps -4%
Dell G3 15 3500-G4DG2
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
111 (96.7min) fps -6%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
104 (88.9min) fps -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
103 (91.7min) fps -13%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M
102 (88.8min) fps -14%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5300M
94.7 (83.3min) fps -20%
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
88.3 (79.8min) fps -25%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø60 (56-64)
bassomedioaltoultra
GTA V (2015) 178 171 140 76
The Witcher 3 (2015) 288.3 193.2 117.6 65.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 150 135 124 118
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 137 87.6 63.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 101 89 75.2
Strange Brigade (2018) 311 150 122 104
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Phison PS5013 PM8256GPTCB4B8TF
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Noise
-7%
3%
-2%
3%
-6%
off /ambiente *
25.8
25
3%
27
-5%
26.5
-3%
30.7
-19%
29.3
-14%
Idle Minimum *
25.8
31
-20%
32.4
-26%
26.5
-3%
30.7
-19%
31.9
-24%
Idle Average *
33.2
32
4%
32.4
2%
26.5
20%
30.7
8%
31.9
4%
Idle Maximum *
33.2
36
-8%
32.4
2%
32.4
2%
30.7
8%
33.5
-1%
Load Average *
37.3
55
-47%
32.5
13%
55.4
-49%
36.6
2%
47
-26%
Witcher 3 ultra *
60.8
53
13%
47.2
22%
55.3
9%
47
23%
53.8
12%
Load Maximum *
60.8
57
6%
51.9
15%
55.3
9%
50.9
16%
56.7
7%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Rumorosità

Idle
25.8 / 33.2 / 33.2 dB(A)
Sotto carico
37.3 / 60.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silenzioso
40 dB(A)
udibile
50 dB(A)
rumoroso
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm di distanza)   Rumorosità ambientale: 25.8 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203131.732.632.930.32534.434.635.635.635.43124.323.72325.823.74023.223.221.522.723502421.321.321.325.76332.720.822.721.134.28027.32223.722.523.510022.820.821.720.929.312523.924.422.522.427.916024.12019.216.827.520025.321.219.116.832.525028.221.719.315.930.631530.922.519.617.434.34003222.519.816.13850034.422.619.915.738.463034.222.719.713.839.48003724.720.813.542100038.324.621.413.543.7125041.325.622.813.247160043.527.724.113.248.9200042.425.822.313.248.7250040.723.821.213.247.4315043.624.521.413.150.8400044.626.421.113.353.1500041.823.519.713.551.163004225.520.313.649.8800040.22817.113.348.21000036.923.315.513.346.81250036.923.515.413.2451600029.72015.912.540.5SPL53.537.333.225.860.8N8.62.71.80.713.6median 36.9median 23.5median 19.9median 13.5median 43.7Delta6.81.71.41.87.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
Carico massimo
 40.8 °C49.2 °C40.8 °C 
 39.2 °C49.4 °C39 °C 
 30 °C26 °C28 °C 
Massima: 49.4 °C
Media: 38 °C
49.4 °C60 °C48.6 °C
37.4 °C44.6 °C38.8 °C
26.2 °C27 °C28.4 °C
Massima: 60 °C
Media: 40 °C
Alimentazione (max)  45 °C | Temperatura della stanza 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) La temperatura media del lato superiore sotto carico massimo e' di 38 °C / 100 F, rispetto alla media di 33.9 °C / 93 F per i dispositivi di questa classe Gaming.
(-) La temperatura massima sul lato superiore è di 49.4 °C / 121 F, rispetto alla media di 40.5 °C / 105 F, che varia da 21.2 a 68.8 °C per questa classe Gaming.
(-) Il lato inferiore si riscalda fino ad un massimo di 60 °C / 140 F, rispetto alla media di 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle, la temperatura media del lato superiore è di 26.2 °C / 79 F, rispetto alla media deld ispositivo di 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Riproducendo The Witcher 3, la temperatura media per il lato superiore e' di 36 °C / 97 F, rispetto alla media del dispositivo di 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) I poggiapolsi e il touchpad sono piu' freddi della temperatura della pelle con un massimo di 30 °C / 86 F e sono quindi freddi al tatto.
(±) La temperatura media della zona del palmo della mano di dispositivi simili e'stata di 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.332.630.32532.835.632.8312523254022.721.522.7502421.324633022.730803723.73710048.221.748.212554.322.554.316061.519.261.520064.319.164.325067.119.367.131566.719.666.74006419.86450069.319.969.363072.919.772.980074.620.874.610007021.470125069.822.869.8160071.724.171.720007122.371250065.521.265.5315066.221.466.2400073.821.173.850007519.775630075.420.375.4800072.217.172.21000070.415.570.41250067.915.467.91600071.515.971.5SPL83.933.283.9N63.41.863.4median 69.8median 19.9median 69.8Delta3.71.43.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Diagramma frequenza (le caselle possono essere selezionate/deselezionate per confrontare i dispositivi)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 analisi audio

(+) | gli altoparlanti sono relativamente potenti (83.9 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | bassi ridotti - in media 9.4% inferiori alla media
(±) | la linearità dei bassi è media (10.2% delta rispetto alla precedente frequenza)
Medi 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | medi bilanciati - solo only 2.2% rispetto alla media
(+) | medi lineari (5.2% delta rispetto alla precedente frequenza)
Alti 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | Alti bilanciati - appena 3.7% dalla media
(+) | alti lineari (5.8% delta rispetto alla precedente frequenza)
Nel complesso 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | suono nel complesso lineare (9.9% differenza dalla media)
Rispetto alla stessa classe
» 4% di tutti i dispositivi testati in questa classe è stato migliore, 2% simile, 94% peggiore
» Il migliore ha avuto un delta di 6%, medio di 18%, peggiore di 132%
Rispetto a tutti i dispositivi testati
» 4% di tutti i dispositivi testati in questa classe è stato migliore, 1% similare, 96% peggiore
» Il migliore ha avuto un delta di 4%, medio di 25%, peggiore di 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz analisi audio

(+) | gli altoparlanti sono relativamente potenti (83.6 dB)
Bassi 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | bassi ridotti - in media 11.3% inferiori alla media
(±) | la linearità dei bassi è media (14.2% delta rispetto alla precedente frequenza)
Medi 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | medi bilanciati - solo only 2.4% rispetto alla media
(+) | medi lineari (5.5% delta rispetto alla precedente frequenza)
Alti 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | Alti bilanciati - appena 2% dalla media
(+) | alti lineari (4.5% delta rispetto alla precedente frequenza)
Nel complesso 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | suono nel complesso lineare (10.2% differenza dalla media)
Rispetto alla stessa classe
» 6% di tutti i dispositivi testati in questa classe è stato migliore, 2% simile, 92% peggiore
» Il migliore ha avuto un delta di 5%, medio di 19%, peggiore di 53%
Rispetto a tutti i dispositivi testati
» 4% di tutti i dispositivi testati in questa classe è stato migliore, 1% similare, 95% peggiore
» Il migliore ha avuto un delta di 4%, medio di 25%, peggiore di 134%

Consumo di corrente
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 2.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 10 / 16.9 / 28.3 Watt
Sotto carico midlight 122.7 / 224.1 Watt
 color bar
Leggenda: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Phison PS5013 PM8256GPTCB4B8TF, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption
6%
17%
2%
38%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
10
10
-0%
9.2
8%
9.9
1%
3.2
68%
14.2
-42%
Idle Average *
16.9
13
23%
14.6
14%
17
-1%
8.3
51%
18.8
-11%
Idle Maximum *
28.3
23
19%
18.1
36%
31.9
-13%
8.7
69%
23.9
16%
Load Average *
122.7
137
-12%
84
32%
90.5
26%
82
33%
96.9
21%
Witcher 3 ultra *
143.2
140
2%
142
1%
162.3
-13%
151
-5%
185
-29%
Load Maximum *
224.1
222
1%
194
13%
202.1
10%
195
13%
233.4
-4%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Autonomia della batteria
WiFi Websurfing
5ore 52minuti
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 76 Wh
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502L
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 76 Wh
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 70.91 Wh
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 46.74 Wh
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 60 Wh
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 51 Wh
Autonomia della batteria
-6%
11%
38%
23%
-37%
WiFi v1.3
352
331
-6%
391
11%
484
38%
433
23%
220
-37%
Reader / Idle
516
703
848
Load
90
101
84

Pro

+ eccellente sostenibilità delle prestazioni in modalità turbo
+ facilità di manutenzione; 2x M.2 2280, 1x SODIMM
+ design del telaio sottile ed elegante
+ 144 Hz frequenza di aggiornamento
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ no PWM

Contro

- Il display Panda ha tempi di risposta lenti e colori limitati
- i font dei tasti sono difficili da vedere senza la retroilluminazione
- un po' costoso per un portatile GTX 1660 Ti
- nessuna webcam integrata o lettore SD
- i profili delle prestazioni sono confusi
- ventole rumorose in modalità turbo
Recensione: Asus Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-B17N4. Dispositivo di test fornito da Intel
Recensione: Asus Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-B17N4. Dispositivo di test fornito da Intel

La modalità Turbo sui portatili Asus Zephyrus ha un impatto maggiore sulle prestazioni rispetto alla modalità Turbo della maggior parte dei portatili MSI. Gli utenti non dovrebbero confondere la modalità Turbo con la modalità Performance, che funziona a velocità di clock più basse e a temperature leggermente più alte a causa limite basso del rumore della ventola.

A parte i profili di potenza confusi e le loro influenze sulle prestazioni, il GU502LU potrebbe essere migliore se si considera il prezzo di $1400 USD. La GPU GTX 1660 Ti, lo spazio colore ristretto e i tempi di risposta del display lento sono comuni nei computer portatili gaming economici che costano al dettaglio a centinaia di dollari in meno rispetto a questo Asus. Invece, il sovrapprezzo qui è riguarda il design del telaio relativamente sottile e leggero, poiché le alternative più economiche con le stesse specifiche interne sono tipicamente più spesse, più pesanti e probabilmente meno attraenti come la serie Acer Nitro, HP Pavilion Gaming, MSI GP65, o la serie Dell G3.

Prestazioni di gioco convenienti per un prezzo medio. Gli utenti pagheranno un extra per il telaio più sottile, più elegante e più portatile. Per il resto, è possibile trovare la stessa CPU, GPU e display su gaming laptop più economici e più pesanti.

Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 - 10/12/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis
81 / 98 → 82%
Tastiera
79%
Dispositivo di puntamento
75%
Connettività
62 / 80 → 77%
Peso
63 / 10-66 → 94%
Batteria
68 / 95 → 72%
Display
80%
Prestazioni di gioco
93%
Prestazioni Applicazioni
90%
Temperatura
83 / 95 → 88%
Rumorosità
69 / 90 → 77%
Audio
88%
Media
72%
82%
Gaming - Media ponderata

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Asus Zephyrus M15 GU502LU vs. GU502LW: dov'è la differenza?
Allen Ngo, 2020-10-14 (Update: 2020-10-14)