Recensione Breve del Portatile Gigabyte P55K v5

Name: Gigabyte P55K v5
Brand: Gigabyte

GTX 965M gaming. Non contento di una GTX 960M e la GTX 970M è un po' troppo? Allora la GTX 965M potrebbe fare al caso vostro.

Allen Ngo, Published 04/28/2016 🇺🇸 🇪🇸 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

Dispositivo di test fornito da CUKUSA.com

Scarica la tua immagine come PNG / SVG

Gigabyte P55K v5 (P55 Serie)

Processore

Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake

Scheda grafica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 924 MHz, Memoria: 5010 MHz, GDDR5, 359

Memoria

32 GB

, DDR4-2132 SDRAM, 1066.1 MHz (PC4-17000)

Schermo

15.60 pollici 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Name: AU Optronics B156HAN01.2, ID: AUO12ED, lucido: no

Scheda madre

Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)

Harddisk

SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122, 1024 GB

Scheda audio

Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller

Porte di connessione

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen 2, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Connessioni Audio: Köpfhörer, Mikrofon, Lettore schede: SD-Cardreader

Rete

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1 + LE

Drive ottico

MATSHITADVD-RAM UJ8G2

Dimensioni

altezza x larghezza x profondità (in mm): 34 x 380 x 269

Batteria

63 Wh ioni di litio

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD-Webcam

Altre caratteristiche

Tastiera: chiclet, Illuminazione Tastiera: si, 24 Mesi Garanzia

Peso

2.645 kg, Alimentazione: 665 gr

Prezzo

1399 Euro

Links

Gigabyte homepage

Nota: il produttore potrebbe usare componenti di fornitori diversi pannelli dei diplay, drive o banchi di memoria con specifiche simili.

guarda tutte le specifiche

Asus GL552VW-DK725T Gigabyte P55K v5 SCHENKER XMG A516 Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV MSI GS60-6QE4K16H21 Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD DIN A4 ❌

Right: 3.5 mm earphones, 3.5 mm microphone, 2x USB 3.0, Optical drive, AC adapter

Left: Kensington Lock, VGA, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB Type-C Gen. 2, 1x USB 3.0


283 cd/m²	301.9 cd/m²	264.9 cd/m²
265.5 cd/m²	274.9 cd/m²	219.2 cd/m²
258.7 cd/m²	245.8 cd/m²	217.2 cd/m²

Distribuzione della luminosità

Name: AU Optronics B156HAN01.2, ID: AUO12ED tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Massima: 301.9 cd/m² (Nits) Media: 259 cd/m²
Distribuzione della luminosità: 72 %
Al centro con la batteria: 274.9 cd/m²
Contrasto: 749:1 (Nero: 0.367 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.21 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
91% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2)

	Gigabyte P55K v5 15.6", 1920x1080	Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD 15.6", 1920x1080	MSI GS60-6QE4K16H21 15.6", 3840x2160	Asus GL552JX-CN154H 15.6", 1920x1080	Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV 15.6", 3840x2160
Display		6%	-16%	5%	21%
Display P3 Coverage	65.9	68.5 4%	53.1 -19%	67.8 3%	86.2 31%
sRGB Coverage	91	97.2 7%	80 -12%	97.5 7%	100 10%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage		70.4	54.8	70	99.5
Response Times		-72%	2%		-9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	37.2 ?(16, 21.2)	64 ?(27, 37) -72%	40 ?(12, 28) -8%		49 ?(24, 25) -32%
Response Time Black / White *	29.2 ?(12, 17.2)	50 ?(12, 38) -71%	26 ?(8, 18) 11%		25 ?(7, 18) 14%
PWM Frequency			1316 ?(20)		1000 ?(10)
Screen		2%	-33%	10%	27%
Brightness middle	274.9	371.5 35%	212 -23%	326 19%	303 10%
Brightness	259	356 37%	197 -24%	317 22%	291 12%
Brightness Distribution	72	92 28%	78 8%	91 26%	83 15%
Black Level *	0.367	0.252 31%	0.49 -34%	0.31 16%	0.22 40%
Contrast	749	1474 97%	433 -42%	1052 40%	1377 84%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.39	5.55 -64%	7.8 -130%	4.14 -22%	3.47 -2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.76	10.95 -90%			6.79 -18%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.21	7.1 -69%	5.23 -24%	5.46 -30%	1.17 72%
Gamma	2.18 ^101%	2.1 ^105%	3.05 ^72%	2.44 ^90%	2.35 ^94%
CCT	6069 ^107%		6693 ^97%	7574 ^86%	6658 ^98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	59.2	63.4 7%	50 -16%	64 8%	86 45%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	90.9	97.9 8%	80 -12%	97 7%	100 10%
Media totale (Programma / Settaggio)		-21% / -8%	-16% / -25%	8% / 9%	13% / 21%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Tempi di risposta del Display

ℹ

I tempi di risposta del display mostrano quanto sia veloce lo schermo a cambaire da un colore all'altro. Tempi di risposta lenti possono creare sovrapposizioni negloi oggetti in movimento. Specialmente i giocatori patiti del 3D dovrebbero usare uno schermo con tempi di risposta bassi.

↔ Tempi di risposta dal Nero al Bianco
29.2 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato	↗ 12 ms Incremento
29.2 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato	↘ 17.2 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta relativamente lenti nei nostri tests e potrebbe essere troppo lento per i gamers. In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.1 (minimo) a 240 (massimo) ms. » 76 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore. Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (21 ms).
↔ Tempo di risposta dal 50% Grigio all'80% Grigio
37.2 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato	↗ 16 ms Incremento
37.2 ms ... aumenta ↗ e diminuisce ↘ combinato	↘ 21.2 ms Calo
Lo schermo mostra tempi di risposta lenti nei nostri tests e sarà insoddisfacente per i gamers. In confronto, tutti i dispositivi di test variano da 0.165 (minimo) a 636 (massimo) ms. » 50 % di tutti i dispositivi è migliore. Questo significa che i tempi di risposta rilevati sono peggiori rispetto alla media di tutti i dispositivi testati (32.9 ms).

Sfarfallio dello schermo / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Per ridurre la luminosità dello schermo, alcuni portatili accendono e spengono la retroilluminazione in rapida successione - un metodo chiamato Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). Questa frequenza di ciclo a livello ideale non dovrebbe essere percepibile dall'occhi umano. Se tale frequenza è troppo bassa, gli utenti con occhi sensibili potrebbero stancarsi gli occhi o avere mal di testa o anche notare uno sfarfallio.

flickering dello schermo / PWM non rilevato

In confronto: 53 % di tutti i dispositivi testati non utilizza PWM per ridurre la luminosita' del display. Se è rilevato PWM, una media di 8774 (minimo: 5 - massimo: 343500) Hz è stata rilevata.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit (ordina per valore)
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	139 Points
Eurocom Sky DLX7 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	177 Points +27%
Aorus X7 Pro v5 GeForce GTX 970M SLI, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e	150 Points +8%
MSI PX60 QD-034US GeForce GTX 950M, 5700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	144 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 GeForce GTX 860M, 4700HQ, Western Digital WD10S21X SSHD 1TB + 8GB SSD-Cache	125 Points -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit (ordina per valore)
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	680 Points
Eurocom Sky DLX7 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	878 Points +29%
Aorus X7 Pro v5 GeForce GTX 970M SLI, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e	701 Points +3%
MSI PX60 QD-034US GeForce GTX 950M, 5700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	723 Points +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 GeForce GTX 860M, 4700HQ, Western Digital WD10S21X SSHD 1TB + 8GB SSD-Cache	490 Points -28%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit (ordina per valore)
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	1.56 Points
Eurocom Sky DLX7 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	1.97 Points +26%
Aorus X7 Pro v5 GeForce GTX 970M SLI, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e	1.73 Points +11%
MSI PX60 QD-034US GeForce GTX 950M, 5700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	1.67 Points +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 GeForce GTX 860M, 4700HQ, Western Digital WD10S21X SSHD 1TB + 8GB SSD-Cache	1.46 Points -6%
CPU Multi 64Bit (ordina per valore)
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	7.48 Points
Eurocom Sky DLX7 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	9.7 Points +30%
Aorus X7 Pro v5 GeForce GTX 970M SLI, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e	7.7 Points +3%
MSI PX60 QD-034US GeForce GTX 950M, 5700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	7.86 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 GeForce GTX 860M, 4700HQ, Western Digital WD10S21X SSHD 1TB + 8GB SSD-Cache	5.29 Points -29%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit (ordina per valore)
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	20493 Points
Eurocom Sky DLX7 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	26040 Points +27%
Aorus X7 Pro v5 GeForce GTX 970M SLI, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e	21046 Points +3%
MSI PX60 QD-034US GeForce GTX 950M, 5700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	21568 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 GeForce GTX 860M, 4700HQ, Western Digital WD10S21X SSHD 1TB + 8GB SSD-Cache	14329 Points -30%
Rendering Single 32Bit (ordina per valore)
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	5301 Points
Eurocom Sky DLX7 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	6604 Points +25%
Aorus X7 Pro v5 GeForce GTX 970M SLI, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e	5653 Points +7%
MSI PX60 QD-034US GeForce GTX 950M, 5700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	5539 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 GeForce GTX 860M, 4700HQ, Western Digital WD10S21X SSHD 1TB + 8GB SSD-Cache	4999 Points -6%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m (ordina per valore)
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	229.9 s *
Eurocom Sky DLX7 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	178 s * +23%
MSI PX60 QD-034US GeForce GTX 950M, 5700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	205.8 s * +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 GeForce GTX 860M, 4700HQ, Western Digital WD10S21X SSHD 1TB + 8GB SSD-Cache	323 s * -40%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M (ordina per valore)
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	589 s *
Eurocom Sky DLX7 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	463.8 s * +21%
MSI PX60 QD-034US GeForce GTX 950M, 5700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	570 s * +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 GeForce GTX 860M, 4700HQ, Western Digital WD10S21X SSHD 1TB + 8GB SSD-Cache	569 s * +3%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6840

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

20493

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5301

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

49 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.48 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.56 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

51 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

680 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

139 Points

Aiuto

... in confronto

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2 (ordina per valore)
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	3845 Points
Asus GL552VW-DH74 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO M.2 500GB	3855 Points 0%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	3753 Points -2%
MSI GS60-6QE4K16H21 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Hynix HFS256G3MND	3134 Points -18%
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B512 M.2 512 GB	3154 Points -18%
Work Score Accelerated v2 (ordina per valore)
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4964 Points
Asus GL552VW-DH74 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO M.2 500GB	4916 Points -1%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	4696 Points -5%
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B512 M.2 512 GB	3964 Points -20%
Creative Score Accelerated v2 (ordina per valore)
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4621 Points
Asus GL552VW-DH74 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO M.2 500GB	4843 Points +5%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	4659 Points +1%
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B512 M.2 512 GB	4449 Points -4%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3845 punti
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4621 punti
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4964 punti
Aiuto

	Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	Gigabyte P55W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe	Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	MSI GS60-6QE4K16H21 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Hynix HFS256G3MND	Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B512 M.2 512 GB
AS SSD		100%	133%	12%	14%
Copy Game MB/s	377.5	463.7 23%	805 113%		346.1 -8%
Copy Program MB/s	178.2	278.4 56%	325.3 83%		276.5 55%
Copy ISO MB/s	354.5	558 57%	1127 218%		457.1 29%
Score Total	868	2201 154%	2410 178%	998 15%	859 -1%
Score Write	311	342 10%	675 117%	352 13%	354 14%
Score Read	366	1265 246%	1180 222%	425 16%	333 -9%
Access Time Write *	0.085	0.033 61%	0.035 59%	0.112 -32%	0.053 38%
Access Time Read *	0.087	0.066 24%	0.038 56%	0.089 -2%	0.071 18%
4K-64 Write	227.9	175.5 -23%	513 125%	232.2 2%	243.8 7%
4K-64 Read	294.6	1045 255%	990 236%	344.7 17%	259.4 -12%
4K Write	46.73	112.7 141%	105.4 126%	80.9 73%	67.9 45%
4K Read	25.09	45.15 80%	31.86 27%	28.77 15%	21.75 -13%
Seq Write	360.4	536 49%	570 58%	389.3 8%	424.8 18%
Seq Read	467.6	1739 272%	1579 238%	516 10%	514 10%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122

Valore Minimo di trasferimento: 57.8 MB/s

Valore Massimo di trasferimento: 123.4 MB/s

Valore Medio di trasferimento: 93.3 MB/s

Tempi di accesso: 15.1 ms

Burst Rate: 214.4 MB/s

Utilizzo CPU: 3.3 %

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined (ordina per valore)
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	6712 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	10625 Points +58%
Gigabyte P55W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe	6759 Points +1%
Asus GL552VW-DH74 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO M.2 500GB	5808 Points -13%
Asus N752VX-GC131T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256	3682 Points -45%
1280x720 Performance GPU (ordina per valore)
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	7128 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	12967 Points +82%
Gigabyte P55W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe	9910 Points +39%
Asus GL552VW-DH74 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO M.2 500GB	5779 Points -19%
Asus N752VX-GC131T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256	4457 Points -37%
1280x720 Performance (ordina per valore)
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	7269 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	12364 Points +70%
Gigabyte P55W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe	8932 Points +23%
Asus GL552VW-DH74 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO M.2 500GB	6110 Points -16%
Asus N752VX-GC131T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256	4596 Points -37%

3DMark
Fire Strike Extreme Combined (ordina per valore)
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	1037 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	2047 Points +97%
Asus GL552VW-DH74 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO M.2 500GB	960 Points -7%
Asus N752VX-GC131T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256	605 Points -42%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics (ordina per valore)
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	2507 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	4673 Points +86%
Asus GL552VW-DH74 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO M.2 500GB	2178 Points -13%
Asus N752VX-GC131T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256	1520 Points -39%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Combined (ordina per valore)
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	1858 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	3748 Points +102%
Gigabyte P55W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe	2774 Points +49%
Asus GL552VW-DH74 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO M.2 500GB	1791 Points -4%
Asus N752VX-GC131T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256	1033 Points -44%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics (ordina per valore)
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	5323 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	9963 Points +87%
Gigabyte P55W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe	7450 Points +40%
Asus GL552VW-DH74 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO M.2 500GB	4645 Points -13%
Asus N752VX-GC131T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256	3174 Points -40%
Fire Strike Extreme Score (ordina per valore)
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	2433 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	4522 Points +86%
Asus GL552VW-DH74 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO M.2 500GB	2156 Points -11%
Asus N752VX-GC131T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256	1482 Points -39%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score (ordina per valore)
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4760 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	8793 Points +85%
Gigabyte P55W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe	6565 Points +38%
Asus GL552VW-DH74 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO M.2 500GB	4299 Points -10%
Asus N752VX-GC131T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B256	2866 Points -40%

3DMark 11 Performance		7269 punti
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		83531 punti
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		18013 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Score		4760 punti
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		2433 punti
Aiuto

... in confronto

Sleeping Dogs
1366x768 High Preset AA:High
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	176.6 fps +67%
Aorus X3 Plus v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	123.5 fps +17%
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	105.8 fps
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NV GeForce GTX 960M, 6300HQ	87.4 fps -17%
MSI PX60 QD-034US GeForce GTX 950M, 5700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	77.8 fps -26%
1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	59.7 fps +81%
Aorus X3 Plus v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	45 fps +37%
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	32.9 fps
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NV GeForce GTX 960M, 6300HQ	23.5 fps -29%
MSI PX60 QD-034US GeForce GTX 950M, 5700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	18.6 fps -43%

BioShock Infinite
1366x768 High Preset
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	205.5 fps +55%
Aorus X3 Plus v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	146.8 fps +11%
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	132.2 fps
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NV GeForce GTX 960M, 6300HQ	112.2 fps -15%
MSI PX60 QD-034US GeForce GTX 950M, 5700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	106.7 fps -19%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	92.4 fps +76%
Aorus X3 Plus v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	71.8 fps +37%
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	52.4 fps
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NV GeForce GTX 960M, 6300HQ	42.8 fps -18%
MSI PX60 QD-034US GeForce GTX 950M, 5700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	39.6 fps -24%

Metro: Last Light
1366x768 High (DX11) AF:16x
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	125.8 fps +70%
Aorus X3 Plus v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	93.8 fps +27%
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	74 fps
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NV GeForce GTX 960M, 6300HQ	56.5 fps -24%
MSI PX60 QD-034US GeForce GTX 950M, 5700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	51.1 fps -31%
1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	70.6 fps +80%
Aorus X3 Plus v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	53.6 fps +37%
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	39.2 fps
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NV GeForce GTX 960M, 6300HQ	30.6 fps -22%
MSI PX60 QD-034US GeForce GTX 950M, 5700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	25.8 fps -34%

Thief
1366x768 High Preset AA:FXAA & Low SS AF:4x
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	114.7 fps +73%
Aorus X3 Plus v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	73 fps +10%
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	66.2 fps
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NV GeForce GTX 960M, 6300HQ	50.5 fps -24%
MSI PX60 QD-034US GeForce GTX 950M, 5700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	46.3 fps -30%
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	65.4 fps +88%
Aorus X3 Plus v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	46.5 fps +34%
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	34.8 fps
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NV GeForce GTX 960M, 6300HQ	27.9 fps -20%
MSI PX60 QD-034US GeForce GTX 950M, 5700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	23 fps -34%

Batman: Arkham Knight
1920x1080 High / On (Interactive Smoke & Paper Debris Off) AA:SM AF:8x
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	76 fps +95%
Aorus X3 Plus v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	59 fps +51%
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	39 fps
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NV GeForce GTX 960M, 6300HQ	29 fps -26%
1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	52 fps +117%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NV GeForce GTX 960M, 6300HQ	27 fps +13%
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	24 fps

Metal Gear Solid V
1920x1080 High / On
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	60 fps 0%
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	60 fps
Aorus X3 Plus v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	59.9 fps 0%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NV GeForce GTX 960M, 6300HQ	55.9 fps -7%
MSI PX60 QD-034US GeForce GTX 950M, 5700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	49.9 fps -17%
1920x1080 Extra High / On
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	60 fps +27%
Aorus X3 Plus v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	59.1 fps +25%
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	47.1 fps
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NV GeForce GTX 960M, 6300HQ	38 fps -19%
MSI PX60 QD-034US GeForce GTX 950M, 5700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	32.8 fps -30%

Fallout 4
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	73.8 fps +88%
Aorus X3 Plus v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	52.9 fps +35%
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	39.3 fps
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NV GeForce GTX 960M, 6300HQ	33.1 fps -16%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	59.7 fps +94%
Aorus X3 Plus v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	42.4 fps +38%
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	30.7 fps
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NV GeForce GTX 960M, 6300HQ	25.5 fps -17%

Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	60.4 fps +65%
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	36.6 fps
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 1TB	51.6 fps +82%
Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	28.3 fps

	medio	alto	ultra
Sleeping Dogs (2012)	150.1	105.8	32.9
BioShock Infinite (2013)	148.1	132.2	52.4
Metro: Last Light (2013)	115.6	74	39.2
Thief (2014)	75.9	66.2	34.8
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)	75	39	24
Metal Gear Solid V (2015)	60	60	47.1
Fallout 4 (2015)	60.2	39.3	30.7
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	60.8	36.6	28.3

	Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	MSI GS60-6QE4K16H21 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Hynix HFS256G3MND	Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B512 M.2 512 GB	Gigabyte P35X v5 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Noise		9%	-6%	-3%	-3%
off /ambiente *	29			31.3 -8%
Idle Minimum *	32	29.2 9%	35 -9%	31.2 2%	32.2 -1%
Idle Average *	33	29.3 11%	36 -9%	31.2 5%	32.3 2%
Idle Maximum *	33	29.5 11%	37 -12%	36.2 -10%	32.6 1%
Load Average *	41	36.5 11%	40 2%	45.3 -10%	44.4 -8%
Load Maximum *	50	47.7 5%	50 -0%	47.3 5%	54.6 -9%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Rumorosità

Idle		32 / 33 / 33 dB(A)
DVD		37 / dB(A)
Sotto carico		41 / 50 dB(A)

	30 dB silenzioso 40 dB(A) udibile 50 dB(A) rumoroso
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm di distanza) Rumorosità ambientale: 29 dB(A)

Carico massimo

Idle


52.6 °C	44.6 °C	30 °C
42.6 °C	41.8 °C	29.2 °C
41.2 °C	44.6 °C	30 °C

Massima: 52.6 °C
Media: 39.6 °C


31 °C	34.4 °C	40.2 °C
29.6 °C	47 °C	50.2 °C
32 °C	39.8 °C	50 °C

Massima: 50.2 °C
Media: 39.4 °C

Alimentazione (max) 52 °C | Temperatura della stanza 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(-) La temperatura media del lato superiore sotto carico massimo e' di 39.6 °C / 103 F, rispetto alla media di 33.9 °C / 93 F per i dispositivi di questa classe Gaming.
(-) La temperatura massima sul lato superiore è di 52.6 °C / 127 F, rispetto alla media di 40.5 °C / 105 F, che varia da 21.2 a 68.8 °C per questa classe Gaming.
(-) Il lato inferiore si riscalda fino ad un massimo di 50.2 °C / 122 F, rispetto alla media di 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle, la temperatura media del lato superiore è di 21.7 °C / 71 F, rispetto alla media deld ispositivo di 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) I poggiapolsi e il touchpad possono diventare molto caldi al tatto con un massimo di 44.6 °C / 112.3 F.
(-) La temperatura media della zona del palmo della mano di dispositivi simili e'stata di 28.9 °C / 84 F (-15.7 °C / -28.3 F).

	Gigabyte P55K v5 GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	Gigabyte P55W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe	Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	MSI GS60 6QE-046XPL GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU	Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B512 M.2 512 GB
Power Consumption		-2%	-26%	-45%	1%
Idle Minimum *	10.1	9 11%	12.5 -24%	12.8 -27%	8.9 12%
Idle Average *	13.3	13 2%	19.6 -47%	19.1 -44%	13.9 -5%
Idle Maximum *	15.4	17 -10%	22.8 -48%	23.6 -53%	15.6 -1%
Load Average *	75.8	81 -7%	102 -35%	147.9 -95%	89 -17%
Load Maximum *	144	152 -6%	107 26%	155.9 -8%	118 18%

* ... Meglio usare valori piccoli

Consumo di corrente

Off / Standby	0.28 / 1.17 Watt
Idle	10.1 / 13.3 / 15.4 Watt
Sotto carico	75.8 / 144 Watt


Leggenda: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Gigabyte P55K v5 61 Wh	Gigabyte P55W v5 61 Wh	Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD 84 Wh	MSI GS60-6QE4K16H21 47 Wh	Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV 52 Wh
Autonomia della batteria		19%	71%	-43%	-8%
Reader / Idle	502	604 20%	979 95%	213 -58%	530 6%
WiFi v1.3	295	348 18%	544 84%	157 -47%	218 -26%
Load	79	93 18%	106 34%	61 -23%	75 -5%

Autonomia della batteria

Idle (senza WLAN, min luminosità)		8ore 22minuti
WiFi Websurfing		4ore 55minuti
Sotto carico (max luminosità)		1ore 19minuti

Pro

+ colori leggermente più precisi; ampia copertura della gamma

+ tastiera comoda; lunga corsa dei tasti

+ eccellenti prestazioni gaming in 1080p

+ prezzo di partenza basso

Contro

- supporto Thunderbolt 3 non nativo

- ventola sempre attiva

- manca la compatibilità RAID

In review: Gigabyte P55K v5. Test model courtesy of CUKUSA.com

The Gigabyte P55K v5 is defined by its GTX 965M GPU and lower starting prices compared to its P55W v5 counterpart. Users can expect about a 25 percent decrease in FPS performance when moving from the GTX 970M to the GTX 965M while potentially saving hundreds of dollars. Overall horsepower will still be good enough for 1080p gameplay on High to Ultra settings at a smooth 30 FPS with a few exceptions. If this is more than acceptable, then the P55K is an easier recommendation.

Aside from the performance hit, we were hoping to see reduced fan noise, longer runtimes, and lower core temperatures than its more powerful P55W v5 sibling. This is unfortunately not the case as we were unable to reproduce any consistent results to prove that the less powerful P55K is any quieter or cooler under similar conditions. The display panel, however, is measurably more accurate than the one on our P55W test unit, so digital artists may want to cherry pick specific SKUs for the higher sRGB coverage as well.

The GTX 965M in the P55K v5 lies comfortably between the GTX 960M and GTX 970M, though the system overall does not necessarily run any quieter, cooler, or longer than its more powerful P55W v5 SKU.

Nota: si tratta di una recensione breve, con alcune sezioni non tradotte, per la versione integrale in inglese guardate qui.

Gigabyte P55K v5 - 2016-04-29 04/29/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis

84 / 98 → 86%

Tastiera

87%

Dispositivo di puntamento

81%

Connettività

53 / 81 → 66%

Peso

59 / 10-66 → 88%

Batteria

81%

Display

87%

Prestazioni di gioco

87%

Prestazioni Applicazioni

89%

Temperatura

87 / 95 → 91%

Rumorosità

75 / 90 → 83%

Audio

77%

Fotocamera

61 / 85 → 71%

Media

77%

83%

Gaming - Media ponderata

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5238 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Recensioni e prove > Recensioni e prove > Recensione Breve del Portatile Gigabyte P55K v5

Allen Ngo, 2016-04-28 (Update: 2020-06- 8)