Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
Specifiche tecniche

Fotocamera Secondaria: 5 MPix f/1.9, LED flash
Price comparison
Media dei 20 punteggi (dalle 29 recensioni)
recensioni per Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
Metallo. Prima plastica, ora metallo: la nuova edizione del Galaxy J5 dà l'impressione di qualità migliore. I componenti interni sono prevalentemente gli stessi, tuttavia. Basta per un update di successo?
Sorgente: It Pro
EN→IT Archive.org versionThe third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 07/16/2018
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80%
Sorgente: It Pro
EN→IT Archive.org versionThe Moto G series has been the gold standard in budget smartphones, but the Samsung Galaxy J5 is a great alternative thanks to its superlative screen and long lasting battery. It's an excellent choice for anyone who's looking for quality on a budget. Having said all that, it’s worth waiting for the new 2016 Moto G4 (the fourth generation Moto G) which is due any day now. Unless you need a cheap phone right away, it’s worth waiting to see if the now Lenovo-owned Motorola can continue its success streak.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 03/20/2017
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80%
Sorgente: It Pro
EN→IT Archive.org versionThe third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Cortissimo, Data: 10/19/2016
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80%
Sorgente: Expert Reviews
EN→IT Archive.org versionDespite this, it’s clear that the Motorola Moto G4 is the phone to beat in the budget smartphone space right now. But that’s not to say there are no reasons to choose the Samsung Galaxy J5. It remains a good option if you value screen quality and battery life above all else. You might prefer it if you're switching across from another Samsung handset and don't fancy changing to a different manufacturer. And you might prefer a smaller handset; the Samsung Galaxy J5 is more compact, more easily usable in one hand and easier to slip into a pocket. Despite the emergence of the Moto G4, then, it hangs on to its Recommended award.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Corto, Data: 10/07/2016
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 100%
Sorgente: Tech Nave
EN→IT Archive.org versionWe are living in a world where sub-RM1000 smartphones are coming out with features taken from flagships that were around scantly a couple of years ago. This scenario has created phones such as the Honor 5X, Vivo X3, Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, Alcatel Flash Plus 2 and so on. Samsung has a tough road ahead to go against the pack with the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016), but we think they can do it - while breaking some sweat, especially for Samsung fans looking for an affordable metal frame Samsung phone.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 09/11/2016
Sorgente: Yugatech
EN→IT Archive.org versionAs we wrap up the review, we can say that the Galaxy J5 (2016) is a well-built phone with decent specs. Although, a usual concern for most thrifty consumers is the pricing of the device. For something this underpowered yet encased in an above average body and topped with a vibrant display, the brand is asking for Php11,990. The official pricing may have put a frown on some but rest assured, it’s a pretty good handset with nifty features crafted for everyday use.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 08/23/2016
Sorgente: KL Gadget Guy
EN→IT Archive.org versionMake no mistake, with an asking price of RM799 for the J5 and RM999 for the J7, you're pretty much paying a premium for the Samsung brand instead of actual performance. If you're one of those people that wouldn't be caught dead with a phone that isn't from a well recognized international brand, the J5 and J7 can be considered. However, if the Samsung name doesn't mean all that much to you, then you should probably opt for one of the many entry/mid-level smartphones that come from brands located in mainland China.
Confronto, disponibile online, Corto, Data: 08/22/2016
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 73% prezzo: 80% prestazioni: 75% caratteristiche: 75% mobilità: 75% qualità di lavorazione: 80%
Sorgente: It Pro
EN→IT Archive.org versionThe third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 08/15/2016
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80%
Sorgente: Laptop Media
EN→IT Archive.org versionThe Samsung Galaxy J lineup proved yet again that affordability and reliability can coexist successfully. After Galaxy J7 and Galaxy J3 performed very well in our reviews, Galaxy J5 (2016) did not let us down, either. On the contrary, it has great features for the asking price. This is a model with nice design, thin profile and metal frame. It offers a 5.2-inch Super AMOLED HD display which is a very good choice both in terms of size and of image quality.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 07/04/2016
Sorgente: Phone Arena
EN→IT Archive.org versionThe Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) is a smartphone of reasonably good quality. It looks elegant and its screen is fairly pleasant. Its software experience is well-accomplished and its camera can land surprisingly good shots. While the Galaxy J5 (2016) does cover the essentials, it does so with the absolute minimum amount of design flair and hardware power required. Priced at around $255 in Asia and €280 in Europe, it becomes easy prey for comparably priced alternatives that present better value for money.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 06/20/2016
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 60%
Sorgente: It Pro
EN→IT Archive.org versionThe third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 06/03/2016
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80%
Sorgente: Think Digit
EN→IT Archive.org versionThe Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) is not the smartphone you should buy. It is quite underpowered compared to other offerings in the market, doesn't have a fingerprint sensor, and its pros don't outweigh the cons. The compromise isn't worth Samsung's brand value.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Corto, Data: 05/30/2016
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 59%
Sorgente: GSM Arena
EN→IT Archive.org versionAs far as the design is concerned the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) lays a solid foundation for the company's upcoming mid-range smartphones. There'll be few people to complain as the phone looks better than its price tag suggests and is rocking top-notch build quality. However, in terms of hardware the Galaxy J5 (2016) feels like a pretty minor update. The bigger screen and battery are always a good way to lure customers in, but the chipset is feeling decidedly dated at this point. And the camera certainly can't live up to the promises that its specs make.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 05/25/2016
Sorgente: Recombu
EN→IT Archive.org versionAt this price, the Galaxy J5 is a very strong rival for the Moto G and other cut-price handsets. It's a solid all-rounder, offering dependable performance and excellent battery life as well as some brilliant camera tech. We prefer the vanilla Android Marshmallow experience of the Moto G, but Sammy fans will love what the Galaxy J5 has to offer.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Corto, Data: 05/16/2016
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 90%
Sorgente: PC Pro
EN→IT Archive.org versionIt’s a shame to end on the slight downer of the camera because it’s the only area where the Samsung Galaxy J5 puts a foot wrong as far as I’m concerned. Usually, when I’ve reviewed a budget handset, I’m extremely eager to get back to my own phone, but in this instance, I’ll actually be a little sad to see the back of the J5. It’s smooth, stylish, and performs nicely with a bright screen and an incredible battery life. On one such day when I barely used the phone, it lost just 3% of its life from sitting in standby.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Cortissimo, Data: 04/29/2016
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 100%
Sorgente: Computerbild - 2/2017

Singola recensione, , Sconosciuta, Data: 01/15/2017
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 86%
Sorgente: Netzwelt
DE→IT Archive.org versionSingola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 11/12/2016
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 78% caratteristiche: 60% mobilità: 90% qualità di lavorazione: 80%
Sorgente: Computerhoy
ES→IT Archive.org versionSingola recensione, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 12/19/2016
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 71% prezzo: 60% caratteristiche: 60% schermo: 80% mobilità: 90% qualità di lavorazione: 70%
Sorgente: Mi Mundo Gadget
ES→IT Archive.org versionSingola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 11/22/2016
Sorgente: Descargar.mobi
ES→IT Archive.org versionSingola recensione, disponibile online, Corto, Data: 02/15/2016
Sorgente: All About Phones
NL→IT Archive.org versionSingola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 10/17/2016
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80%
Sorgente: CNet France
FR→IT Archive.org versionSingola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 10/14/2016
Sorgente: Komputerswiat
PL→IT Archive.org versionSingola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 02/04/2017
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 75% caratteristiche: 73%
Sorgente: Teleguru
PL→IT Archive.org versionSingola recensione, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 12/06/2016
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 67% prestazioni: 80% schermo: 70% mobilità: 60% qualità di lavorazione: 50%
Sorgente: Komputerswiat
PL→IT Archive.org versionSingola recensione, disponibile online, Cortissimo, Data: 08/17/2016
Sorgente: Tekno Seyir
TR→IT Archive.org versionSingola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 03/16/2017
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80%
Sorgente: XT Mobile
VN→IT Archive.org versionSingola recensione, disponibile online, Corto, Data: 08/22/2016
Sorgente: Jagat Review
ID→IT Archive.org versionSingola recensione, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 09/15/2016
Sorgente: Moj Android
SK→IT Archive.org versionSingola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 08/30/2016
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 92% prestazioni: 81% schermo: 82% mobilità: 92% qualità di lavorazione: 80%
Commenti
Qualcomm Adreno 306:
Queste schede grafiche per portatili non sono adatte al gaming. Anche se dovessero funzionare, ci sarebbero diversi errori grafici e un frame rate molto basso. Questi chips non sono affatto per i gamers! Applicazioni internet e da ufficio, invece non sono problematiche per queste GPUs.
>> Ulteriori informazioni le potete trovare nel nostroConfronto delle schede grafiche e nella nostra Lista dei Benchmark.
410 MSM8916:
64-Bit Cortex-A53 Quad-Core con GPU Adreno 306 realizzato in 28nm
>>Ulteriori informazioni le potete trovare nel nostroConfronto dei processori per portatili.