Nokia 3.1 Plus
Specifiche tecniche
Fotocamera Secondaria: 8 MPix 4H7/FF/f2.2
Price comparison
Media dei 10 punteggi (dalle 23 recensioni)
recensioni per Nokia 3.1 Plus
Il Nokia 3.1 Plus vanta diversi giorni di durata della batteria, offrendo allo stesso tempo una veloce e veloce esperienza Android One su hardware decente. Scopri nella nostra recensione cosa aspettarti dal Nokia 3.1 Plus.
Sorgente: PC Mag EN→IT Archive.org version
The affordable Nokia 3.1 Plus for Cricket offers decent performance and good quality for the price, but does little to stand out.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Cortissimo, Data: 05/08/2019
Sorgente: Unbox EN→IT Archive.org version
They absolutely did. While it took them several months (the Nokia 3.1 launched last February 2018, while the Nokia 3.1 Plus launched in October 2018), HMD Global was able to get the right balance of what a budget Android One phone should be: a phone with decent internals, essential features and speedy Android updates.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 03/01/2019
Sorgente: Unbox EN→IT Archive.org version
With the Nokia 3.1 now priced at Php 8,990, the Nokia 3.1 Plus gets its predecessor’s original price of Php 9,990. While it is better than the Nokia 3.1, the Nokia 3.1 Plus is facing tough competition against the likes of Huawei, vivo, Xiaomi, and OPPO.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Corto, Data: 02/12/2019
Sorgente: Android Central EN→IT Archive.org version
This may not be the best phone we've seen from Nokia as of late, but it's a great reminder that this is one of the few companies in the business that knows how to make an exceptional phone at a low cost.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 02/04/2019
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80%
Sorgente: Android Authority EN→IT Archive.org version
HMD Global is bringing the Nokia brand back to the U.S. through Cricket Wireless. This affordable phone finds a good spot in Cricket's lineup of entry-level devices. Anyone on a budget should consider the Nokia 3.1 Plus thanks to its adept handling of smartphone basics.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 02/04/2019
Sorgente: The Indian Express EN→IT Archive.org version
Nokia 3.1 Plus stands out for its build quality and design. However, the competition is ahead when it comes to overall performance. Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has a Snapdragon 636 processor and a 20MP front camera with flash. The battery is a much bigger 4,000mAh. Realme U1 is another stylish option in the budget segment. It gives Nokia 3.1 Plus a tough competition with Helio P70 processor, 25MP selfie camera, face unlock, and more features. Nokia 3.1 Plus might appeal to loyal Nokia users. For others, options are plenty.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 12/10/2018
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 70%
Sorgente: Think Digit EN→IT Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 Plus is for you if you want a smartphone for around Rs 11,000 that’s great on build, design, and software. It’s not for you if you’re expecting outright performance or quick clicks from either of its cameras.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 11/15/2018
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 65%
Sorgente: The Techy EN→IT Archive.org version
The nokia 3.1 plus is a well-built smartphone staying up to its name – nokia. while it has a good feel in the hand, it fails to deliver in performance. The processor is slow resulting in longer load times and slower multitasking. however, we have seen more powerful processors in phones at much lower price points, making it hard for the nokia 3.1 plus to justify its cost.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Corto, Data: 11/15/2018
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 75% prestazioni: 80% qualità di lavorazione: 70%
Sorgente: NDTV Gadgets EN→IT Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 Plus is not the most competitive phone at its price level; not by a long shot. No matter how good it looks on the outside, it's hard to ignore just how much smoother the usage experience is with other models. If you're spending this much money, you should expect nothing less, and physical durability isn't worth much if your needs are going to outgrow its capabilities within a year or two.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 10/19/2018
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 70% prezzo: 60% prestazioni: 60% schermo: 70% mobilità: 100% qualità di lavorazione: 80%
Sorgente: India Today EN→IT Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 Plus is a budget phone with a not so budget pricing, which is perhaps what most people are going to be talking about the most. At Rs 11,499, the phone is pricier than the Nokia 5.1 Plus, which comes with a better chipset. But with that being said, the Nokia 3.1 Plus is also a classy phone. It may not get a glass back, but the design still manages to feel premium. It also gets a bigger display for those who find the Nokia 5.1 Plus a little too compact. While a Helio P22 chipset does leave you wanting more, the battery life will surely not. It is a pretty good Nokia 5.1 Plus alternative, but in the larger scheme of things, the phone falls a little flat among competitors in this price segment. I reckon HMD will have a good chance selling the phone through offline channels rather than online, but we will have to wait and see on that.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Corto, Data: 10/16/2018
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 75%
Sorgente: Gadgets Now EN→IT Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 Plus launch makes it clear that the HMD Global ...
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Corto, Data: 10/15/2018
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 50%
Sorgente: The Times of India EN→IT Archive.org version
Nokia 3.1 Plus impresses us with its unique design and build quality. Performance, however, is rather disappointing. Camera can also be a lot better. At price point, Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 or Redmi 6 Pro and Asus Zenfone Max Pro M1 are better alternatives. ALSO READ: Nokia 6.1 Plus review.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Corto, Data: 10/14/2018
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 60%
Sorgente: The Mobile Indian EN→IT Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 Plus comes loaded with a premium metal design and it surely has some interesting display. The performance is one thing we need to check, while the initial impression of the camera is not that great. The battery should comfortably last a day and you will not face any major issue in the software department. Overall, the Nokia 3.1 Plus seems to be an interesting smartphone, although the competition is pretty tough here.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Corto, Data: 10/11/2018
Sorgente: Android Authority EN→IT Archive.org version
HMD Global is on a roll with its budget and mid-range smartphone portfolio, especially in India. After launching the Nokia 6.1 Plus and Nokia 5.1 Plus in India in quick succession, and the Nokia 7.1 globally, the company has now launched the Nokia 3.1 Plus in India.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Corto, Data: 10/11/2018
Sorgente: Inside Handy DE→IT Archive.org version
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 12/06/2018
Sorgente: Curved DE→IT Archive.org version
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Corto, Data: 12/05/2018
Sorgente: Andro 4 All ES→IT Archive.org version
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 01/11/2019
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 70%
Sorgente: Antyweb PL→IT Archive.org version
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 05/30/2019
Sorgente: Mega Obzor RU→IT Archive.org version
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 01/26/2019
Sorgente: FPT shop VN→IT Archive.org version
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Corto, Data: 03/14/2019
Sorgente: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→IT Archive.org version
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 12/12/2018
Sorgente: The Gioididong VN→IT Archive.org version
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 11/17/2018
Sorgente: Zing VN→IT Archive.org version
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Cortissimo, Data: 11/14/2018
Commenti
Imagination PowerVR GE8320:
Scheda grafica integrata per SoC ARM di fascia media.
Queste schede grafiche per portatili non sono adatte al gaming. Anche se dovessero funzionare, ci sarebbero diversi errori grafici e un frame rate molto basso. Questi chips non sono affatto per i gamers! Applicazioni internet e da ufficio, invece non sono problematiche per queste GPUs.
>> Ulteriori informazioni le potete trovare nel nostroConfronto delle schede grafiche e nella nostra Lista dei Benchmark.
Helio P22 MT6762:
>>Ulteriori informazioni le potete trovare nel nostroConfronto dei processori per portatili.
6.00": Questo display è abbastanza grande per uno smartphone ma spesso viene usato su smartphones.
I display con dimensioni maggiori consentono risoluzioni più elevate. Quindi, i dettagli come le lettere sono più grandi. D'altro canto, il consumo energetico è inferiore negli schermi con diagonali piccole e su dispositivi più piccoli, più leggeri ed economici.
>> Per scoprire come è la risoluzione del vostro schermo, andate a vedere la nostraLista DPI.
69.62%: Questo punteggio è negativo. La maggior parte dei portatili hanno fatto di meglio. Se ne sconsiglia l'acquisto.
>> Ulteriori informazioni le potete trovare nella nostra Guida all'acquisto di un portatile.