Oppo R9s
Specifiche tecniche
Price comparison
Media dei 5 punteggi (dalle 17 recensioni)
recensioni per Oppo R9s
Sorgente: Ausdroid EN→IT Archive.org version
We’ve gone pretty hard on the phones on the software side, but the reality is that they’re affordable, high quality alternatives to the top-tier phones from the big manufacturers. Color OS simply isn’t to our tastes at all – It makes Oppo’s amazing hardware feel just the little bit more pedestrian and uninspired, and it made it a tough sell to stick with the phones for longer than the review period when our usual day-to-day phones feature a more Android-like UI. There’s an increasing number of Aussies out there buying Oppo’s phones though, and it makes us feel that our criticism of Color OS is perhaps a bit off-base for general consumers.
Confronto, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 05/02/2017
Sorgente: Hardware Zone EN→IT Archive.org version
In a nutshell, the Oppo R9s and Oppo R9s Plus are reasonably decent phones - all the expected functionality for its price point, good design (albeit it looks very familiar) and has an acceptable set of cameras for normal photography and high resolution selfies. However in these days, a decent phone for a reasonable price may not be adequate and Oppo needs to be concerned about competition.
Confronto, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 04/30/2017
Sorgente: Android Authority EN→IT Archive.org version
The OPPO R9s has an excellent camera, offers impressive battery life, and features a nice display. However, the number of compromises here is staggering. Among derivative design and software, the R9s has sloppy software, offers below average performance, and has a bleak software support outlook. For Western users, the strange display coating, YouTube audio sync issue, and limited availability are even bigger issues to consider.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 03/15/2017
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 82% prestazioni: 80% schermo: 75% mobilità: 90% qualità di lavorazione: 80%
Sorgente: Cybershack EN→IT Archive.org version
Selling for AUD$598 with 64GB of storage, the OPPO R9s is a great deal, but it’s slightly difficult to recommend over the significantly cheaper F1s if you don’t need the extra bells and whistles, such as the better camera or the horsepower. Vanilla Android would push this phone over the edge and make it an easily recommendable device over its competitors, but as it stands you’ll have to weigh up whether you can deal with the slightly odd operating system. If the operating system isn’t a problem, then you’re getting one of the best value-for-money phones on the market.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 02/24/2017
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80%
Sorgente: Bill Bennett EN→IT Archive.org version
Oppo’s R9s story is all about the price. We don’t know for sure but if it lands in New Zealand at NZ$750 it’ll be competitive. For that money you get most of what you’ll find in premium phones selling for twice the price.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 02/15/2017
Sorgente: Gadgetguy EN→IT Archive.org version
So, great value for money and general performance ranging from very good to excellent. Oppo is on a winner with the R9s phone.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 02/01/2017
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 90% prezzo: 100% prestazioni: 90%
Sorgente: Tech Nave EN→IT Archive.org version
Comparing it with the F1s, both phones share a lot of similarities and one might even opt for the F1s for being cheaper at RM1198, whereas the R9S stands at RM1798. That’s a RM600 difference and it’s easily understood why some customers won’t go for the R9S. However, the R9S is a lot better in terms of picture quality, and the performance is better with a Snapdragon 625 processor. Let’s not forget the awesome battery recharge technology as well. Despite these good points, we still wished OPPO could have been more creative in their design department for it. Seriously, guys.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 01/26/2017
Sorgente: Lowyat.net EN→IT Archive.org version
For the past one year, it is hard not to relate the word “selfie” with OPPO Malaysia’s smartphones given how the company has been working hard to establish its devices which include F1, F1 Plus, and F1s as the “Selfie Expert” devices. This year though, the company has somehow decided to focus on the power of rear camera with the arrival of R9s in our market.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 01/14/2017
Sorgente: Stuff TV EN→IT Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 5 is a worthy contender, although it doesn’t have the same expandable storage, and the excellent OnePlus 3 is a smidge more expensive, but packs a more powerful Snapdragon 820 chip. In any case, both examples do not have the will to last as long as the R9s.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 01/05/2017
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80%
Sorgente: GSM Arena EN→IT Archive.org version
That said, Oppo's execution is the best, and this isn't just because of the six-string antenna design (though that's a big part of it). The R9s has the same screen size as the iPhone 7 Plus, but you wouldn't guess it - the Oppo is so much more compact and lighter. The fingerprint reader is faster than Apple's too.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 12/05/2016
Sorgente: Lowyat.net EN→IT Archive.org version
True to its promise, OPPO today has unveiled two new smartphones called R9s and R9s Plus. As indicated by their names, these new devices are generally the successor to the R9 (released in Malaysia as F1 Plus) and R9 Plus smartphones which themselves were just launched around seven months ago.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Corto, Data: 10/19/2016
Sorgente: Chinahandys.net DE→IT Archive.org version
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 04/06/2017
Valutazione: Punteggio totale: 80% prestazioni: 50% schermo: 90% mobilità: 90% qualità di lavorazione: 100%
Sorgente: El Confidencial ES→IT Archive.org version
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 12/07/2016
Sorgente: Komorkomania PL→IT Archive.org version
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 10/20/2016
Sorgente: Komorkomania PL→IT Archive.org version
Confronto, disponibile online, Medio, Data: 10/14/2016
Sorgente: Webriyota.com TR→IT Archive.org version
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 01/16/2017
Sorgente: TechZ VN→IT Archive.org version
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lunghissimo, Data: 04/16/2017
Commenti
Qualcomm Adreno 506:
Soltanto i giochi datasi possono essere giocati in modo fluido con questi chips grafici (se non richiedono troppe prestazioni). I cores con memoria grafica condivisa in questa categoria hanno il vantaggio delle minori emissioni di calore e della maggiore autonomia della batteria. Per ufficio, internet, image processing, e video editing queste schede grafiche sono utilizzabili senza particolari problematiche.
>> Ulteriori informazioni le potete trovare nel nostroConfronto delle schede grafiche e nella nostra Lista dei Benchmark.
625:
SoC octa-core di fascia media con otto cores CPU ARM Cortex-A53 fino a 2 GHz, una GPU Adreno 506, un controller di memoria DDR3L-1866 ed un modem X9 LTE (Cat 7). Realizzato con un moderno processo da 14nm.
>>Ulteriori informazioni le potete trovare nel nostroConfronto dei processori per portatili.
5.50": Questo display è abbastanza grande per uno smartphone ma spesso viene usato su smartphones.
I display con dimensioni maggiori consentono risoluzioni più elevate. Quindi, i dettagli come le lettere sono più grandi. D'altro canto, il consumo energetico è inferiore negli schermi con diagonali piccole e su dispositivi più piccoli, più leggeri ed economici.
>> Per scoprire come è la risoluzione del vostro schermo, andate a vedere la nostraLista DPI.
82.4%: Il punteggio deve essere considerato medio, in quanto il numero di portatili che hanno ottenuto un punteggio migliore è uguale a quello dei portatili che hanno avuto un punteggio peggiore.
>> Ulteriori informazioni le potete trovare nella nostra Guida all'acquisto di un portatile.