Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

NVIDIA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

La Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti è una scheda grafica desktop di fascia alta basata sulla generazione Ampere. È stata annunciata all'inizio del 2022 come la scheda grafica desktop da gioco più veloce.

Utilizza il grande chip GA102 e offre 10.752 shader e 24 GB di memoria grafica GDDR6X. La RTX3090ti ha una potenza nominale di 450 Watt.

GeForce RTX 3000 Serie

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 10752 @ 1.56 - 1.86 GHz384 Bit @ 21000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 10496 @ 1.4 - 1.7 GHz384 Bit @ 19500 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 10240 @ 1.37 - 1.67 GHz384 Bit @ 19000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB 8960/ cores @ 1.26 - 1.71 GHz384 Bit @ 19000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 8704 @ 1.45 - 1.71 GHz320 Bit @ 19000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 6144 @ 1.58 - 1.77 GHz256 Bit @ 19000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU 7424 @ 0.98 - 1.59 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 5888 @ 1.5 - 1.73 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU 6144 @ 0.78 - 1.25 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 4864 @ 1.41 - 1.67 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU 5888 @ 0.92 - 1.48 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU 5120 @ 0.78 - 1.29 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3584 @ 1.32 - 1.78 GHz192 Bit @ 15000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q 6144 @ 0.78 - 1.25 GHz256 Bit @ 6000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q 5120 @ 1.29 GHz256 Bit
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU 3840 @ 0.82 - 1.7 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q 3840 @ 1.28 GHz192 Bit
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 2560 @ 1.55 - 1.78 GHz128 Bit Bit @ 1750 MHz
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU 2560 @ 1.22 - 1.49 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU 2560 @ 1.24 - 1.49 GHz96 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU 1792 64 Bit
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU 2048 @ 1.24 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Nome in codiceAmpere GA102
ArchitetturaAmpere
Pipelines10752 - unified
TMUs336
ROPs112
Raytracing Cores84
Tensor / AI Cores336
Velocità del core1560 - 1860 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance40 TFLOPS FP16, 40 TFLOPS FP32, 625 TFLOPS FP64
CacheL1: 10.5 MB, L2: 6 MB
Velocità della memoria21000 effective = 1313 MHz
Larghezza del bus di memoria384 Bit
Tipo di memoriaGDDR6X
Max. quantità di memoria24 GB
Memoria condivisano
Memory Bandwidth1008 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6
Consumo di corrente450 Watt
Transistor Count28.3 Billion
Die Size 628 mm²
tecnologia8 nm
PCIe4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Data dell'annuncio27.01.2022
PredecessorGeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)

Benchmark

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
23.5 pt (71%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -100%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
19.4 -17%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB
19.7 -16%
AMD Radeon RX 6800
20.1 -14%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
20.4 -13%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
20.8 -11%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
20.9 -11%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
21.6 -8%
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
22 -6%
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
22 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
23.5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
23.6 0%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
24.1 3%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
24.1 3%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
25.6 9%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super
26.1 11%
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
26.4 12%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
28.1 20%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
28.6 22%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 42%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
19241 Points (55%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
21645 Points (57%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   - Nascondi il grafico di confronto
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
564087 Points (57%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
444102 Points (52%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
75753 Points (72%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
246319 Points (61%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
36563 Points (61%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
53110 Points (60%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
465704 Points (52%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
118439 Points (60%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
46562 Points (54%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
64315 Points (61%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
139165 Points (54%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
49471 Points (64%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
69481 Points (60%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   - Nascondi il grafico di confronto
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
201.7 fps (61%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
85.7 fps (21%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
15.6 fps (2%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
265 fps (58%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
87.1 fps (22%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
197 fps (54%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
27.6 fps (25%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
76.4 fps (31%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
150 fps (25%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
371 fps (65%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
118 fps (32%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
28 fps (3%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
265 fps (58%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
113 fps (24%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
493 fps (56%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
48.4 fps (16%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
353 fps (52%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
230 fps (26%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
373 fps (65%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
197 fps (58%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
23.7 fps (2%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
22.2 fps (21%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
353 fps (57%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
31.6 fps (4%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
84.5 fps (40%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
58.6 fps (38%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
145 fps (60%)
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
108.2 fps (36%)
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
204 fps (12%)
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
6221 Samples/s (22%)
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
16046 Samples/s (28%)
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
52258 punti (56%)
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 598     media: 615     media: 599 (85%)     massimo: 648 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 561     media: 564     media: 561 (78%)     massimo: 569 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
0306090120150180210240270300330360390420450480510540570Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.3447     media: 0.3     media: 0.3 (29%)     massimo: 0.345 fps per Watt
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
- Valori di benchmark per questa scheda grafica
- Valori medi di benchmark per questa scheda grafica
* Numeri più piccoli rappresentano prestazioni supeiori

Benchmarks per i giochi

I seguenti benchmarks deirivano dai benchmarks dei portatili recensiti. Le prestazioni dipendono dalla scheda grafica utilizzata, dal clock rate, dal processore, dai settaggi di sistema, dai drivers, e dai sistemi operativi. Quindi i risultati non sono rappresentativi per i portatili con questa GPU. Per informazioni dettagliate sui risultati del benchmark, cliccate sul numero di fps.

Ghostwire Tokyo

Ghostwire Tokyo

2022
basso 1920x1080
263 263 ~ 263 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
medio 1920x1080
260 260 ~ 260 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
alto 1920x1080
261 261 ~ 261 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
261 261 ~ 261 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
210 210 ~ 210 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
113.2 113.2 ~ 113 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Settings 1280x720
270
Highest Settings + Maximum Ray Tracing 1920x1080
120.2
120.2
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands

Tiny Tina's Wonderlands

2022
basso 1920x1080
324  fps    + Confronta
medio 1920x1080
277 277 ~ 277 fps    + Confronta
alto 1920x1080
231 231 ~ 231 fps    + Confronta
ultra 1920x1080
190.2 190.2 ~ 190 fps    + Confronta
QHD 2560x1440
142.6 142.6 ~ 143 fps    + Confronta
4K 3840x2160
81.1 81.1 ~ 81 fps    + Confronta
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
324
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
348
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6

2022
basso 1920x1080
219 219 ~ 219 fps    + Confronta
medio 1920x1080
201 201 ~ 201 fps    + Confronta
alto 1920x1080
172.8 172.8 ~ 173 fps    + Confronta
ultra 1920x1080
151.8 151.8 ~ 152 fps    + Confronta
QHD 2560x1440
103.9 103.9 ~ 104 fps    + Confronta
4K 3840x2160
53.3 53.3 ~ 53 fps    + Confronta
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
74.7
74.7
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 3840x2160
24.3
24.3
GRID Legends

GRID Legends

2022
basso 1920x1080
228 228 ~ 228 fps    + Confronta
medio 1920x1080
202 202 ~ 202 fps    + Confronta
alto 1920x1080
173.4 173.4 ~ 173 fps    + Confronta
ultra 1920x1080
156.6 156.6 ~ 157 fps    + Confronta
QHD 2560x1440
153.2 153.2 ~ 153 fps    + Confronta
4K 3840x2160
120.5 120.5 ~ 121 fps    + Confronta
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli ultra.
Elden Ring

Elden Ring

2022
basso 1920x1080
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
medio 1920x1080
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
alto 1920x1080
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli ultra.
Dying Light 2

Dying Light 2

2022
basso 1920x1080
202 202 ~ 202 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
medio 1920x1080
171.4 171.4 ~ 171 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
alto 1920x1080
153 153 ~ 153 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
113.2 113.2 ~ 113 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
64.3 64.3 ~ 64 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli alto.
Additional Benchmarks
High Quality Raytracing 1920x1080
76.4
76.4
Rainbow Six Extraction

Rainbow Six Extraction

2022
basso 1920x1080
411 411 ~ 411 fps    + Confronta
medio 1920x1080
347 347 ~ 347 fps    + Confronta
alto 1920x1080
315 315 ~ 315 fps    + Confronta
ultra 1920x1080
290 290 ~ 290 fps    + Confronta
QHD 2560x1440
208 208 ~ 208 fps    + Confronta
4K 3840x2160
116 116 ~ 116 fps    + Confronta
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli ultra.
Forza Horizon 5

Forza Horizon 5

2021
basso 1280x720
231  fps    + Confronta
medio 1920x1080
200 200 ~ 200 fps    + Confronta
alto 1920x1080
188 188 ~ 188 fps    + Confronta
ultra 1920x1080
127 127 ~ 127 fps    + Confronta
QHD 2560x1440
114 114 ~ 114 fps    + Confronta
4K 3840x2160
89 89 ~ 89 fps    + Confronta
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
231
Call of Duty Vanguard

Call of Duty Vanguard

2021
medio 1920x1080
195.5 195.5 ~ 196 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
alto 1920x1080
207 207 ~ 207 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
191.2 191.2 ~ 191 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
149.9 149.9 ~ 150 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
93.7 93.7 ~ 94 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
208
208
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
medio 1920x1080
179 179 ~ 179 fps    + Confronta
alto 1920x1080
161.6 162 ~ 162 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
142 142 ~ 142 fps    + Confronta
QHD 2560x1440
132.9 132.9 ~ 133 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
89.9 90 ~ 90 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
195
195
Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR TAA 1920x1080
122
122
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
medio 1920x1080
537 537 ~ 537 fps    + Confronta
alto 1920x1080
470 470 ~ 470 fps    + Confronta
ultra 1920x1080
242 242 ~ 242 fps    + Confronta
QHD 2560x1440
189.3 189.3 ~ 189 fps    + Confronta
4K 3840x2160
114.9 114.9 ~ 115 fps    + Confronta
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1920x1080
569
569
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla

Assassin´s Creed Valhalla

2020
medio 1920x1080
160 160 ~ 160 fps    + Confronta
alto 1920x1080
138 138 ~ 138 fps    + Confronta
ultra 1920x1080
123 123 ~ 123 fps    + Confronta
QHD 2560x1440
108 108 ~ 108 fps    + Confronta
4K 3840x2160
73 73 ~ 73 fps    + Confronta
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli ultra.
Watch Dogs Legion

Watch Dogs Legion

2020
medio 1920x1080
171.4 171.4 ~ 171 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
alto 1920x1080
154.2 154.2 ~ 154 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
130.2 130.2 ~ 130 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
107.8 107.8 ~ 108 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
70.1 70.1 ~ 70 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing (DX12) 1920x1080
88.7
88.7
Mafia Definitive Edition

Mafia Definitive Edition

2020
medio 1920x1080
240 240 240 ~ 240 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
alto 1920x1080
231 231 ~ 231 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
173.9 173.9 ~ 174 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
99.2 99.2 ~ 99 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli alto.
Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

2019
medio 1920x1080
204 204 ~ 204 fps    + Confronta
alto 1920x1080
187.6 187.6 ~ 188 fps    + Confronta
ultra 1920x1080
173.3 173.3 ~ 173 fps    + Confronta
QHD 2560x1440
143.1 143.1 ~ 143 fps    + Confronta
4K 3840x2160
83.8 83.8 ~ 84 fps    + Confronta
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
221
221
Control

Control

2019
medio 1920x1080
240 240 ~ 240 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
alto 1920x1080
209 209 ~ 209 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
142.5 142.5 ~ 143 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
73.9 73.9 ~ 74 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli alto.
Additional Benchmarks
High Quality Preset & High Ray Tracing Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
130.8
130.8
Total War: Three Kingdoms

Total War: Three Kingdoms

2019
medio 1920x1080
342.6 342.6 ~ 343 fps    + Confronta
alto 1920x1080
248.9 248.9 ~ 249 fps    + Confronta
ultra 1920x1080
176.6 176.6 ~ 177 fps    + Confronta
QHD 2560x1440
117.9 117.9 ~ 118 fps    + Confronta
4K 3840x2160
59.9 59.9 ~ 60 fps    + Confronta
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli ultra.
Metro Exodus

Metro Exodus

2019
medio 1920x1080
213 213 ~ 213 fps    + Confronta
alto 1920x1080
175.2 175.2 ~ 175 fps    + Confronta
ultra 1920x1080
145.9 145.9 ~ 146 fps    + Confronta
QHD 2560x1440
125.3 125.3 ~ 125 fps    + Confronta
4K 3840x2160
84.3 84.3 ~ 84 fps    + Confronta
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Quality DXR 16xAF 1920x1080
128.5
128.5
Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018
medio 1920x1080
265 265 ~ 265 fps    + Confronta
alto 1920x1080
257 257 ~ 257 fps    + Confronta
ultra 1920x1080
244 244 ~ 244 fps    + Confronta
QHD 2560x1440
184 184 ~ 184 fps    + Confronta
4K 3840x2160
106 106 ~ 106 fps    + Confronta
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
301
301
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
basso 1280x720
169.1 169.1 ~ 169 fps    + Confronta
medio 1920x1080
158.1 158.1 ~ 158 fps    + Confronta
alto 1920x1080
135.9 135.9 ~ 136 fps    + Confronta
4K 3840x2160
115.7 115.7 ~ 116 fps    + Confronta
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli alto.
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
basso 1280x720
222 222 ~ 222 fps    + Confronta
medio 1920x1080
226 226 ~ 226 fps    + Confronta
alto 1920x1080
186.1 186.1 ~ 186 fps    + Confronta
QHD 2560x1440
151.6 151.6 ~ 152 fps    + Confronta
4K 3840x2160
96.3 96.3 ~ 96 fps    + Confronta
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli alto.
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
basso 1280x720
257.7 257.7 ~ 258 fps    + Confronta
medio 1366x768
231.2 231.2 ~ 231 fps    + Confronta
alto 1920x1080
217.1 217.1 ~ 217 fps    + Confronta
ultra 1920x1080
194.1 195.8 ~ 195 fps    + Confronta
4K 3840x2160
184.2 184.2 ~ 184 fps    + Confronta
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli ultra.
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
alto 1920x1080
394 394 ~ 394 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
193.4 193.4 196.3 ~ 194 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
172.9 172.9 ~ 173 fps    + Confronta + 📈 Graph
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
107.5
107.5
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
442
442
GTA V

GTA V

2015
alto 1920x1080
179.9 185.6 ~ 183 fps    + Confronta
ultra 1920x1080
151.8 160.7 ~ 156 fps    + Confronta
QHD 2560x1440
146.4 155.3 ~ 151 fps    + Confronta
4K 3840x2160
179.5 182.6 ~ 181 fps    + Confronta
» Giocabile con tutti i portatili testati con dettagli ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
102.3
102.3
104.8
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
185.2
187.1
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
186.3
187.4
bassomedioaltoultraQHD4K
Ghostwire Tokyo263260261261210113
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands32427723119014381
Cyberpunk 2077 1.621920117315210453
GRID Legends228202173157153121
Elden Ring606060606060
Dying Light 220217115311364
Rainbow Six Extraction411347315290208116
Forza Horizon 523120018812711489
Call of Duty Vanguard19620719115094
Far Cry 617916214213390
F1 2021537470242189115
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla16013812310873
Watch Dogs Legion17115413010870
Mafia Definitive Edition24023117499
Borderlands 320418817314384
Control24020914374
Total War: Three Kingdoms34324917711860
Metro Exodus21317514612584
Shadow of the Tomb Raider265257244184106
X-Plane 11.11169158136116
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark22222618615296
Dota 2 Reborn258231217195184
The Witcher 3394194173
GTA V183156151181
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
10

1
21

1
23

1
18

7
14
1
19
4

Per conoscere altri giochi che potrebbero essere utilizzabili e per una lista completa di tutti i giochi e delle schede grafiche visitate la nostra Gaming List

v1.28
log 19. 09:24:59

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:32:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.025s ... 0.027s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#22 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#23 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#24 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#25 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.032s

#26 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#27 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.032s

#28 getting avg benchmarks for device 11324 +0.028s ... 0.06s

#29 got single benchmarks 11324 +0.011s ... 0.07s

#30 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.07s

#31 min, max, avg, median took s +0.828s ... 0.899s

#32 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.899s

#33 Got 242 rows for game benchmarks. +0.043s ... 0.942s

#34 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.942s

#35 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.016s ... 0.958s

#36 benchmarks composed for output. +1.359s ... 2.317s

#37 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.005s ... 2.322s

#38 return log +0s ... 2.322s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

Classe 1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Desktop
Radeon RX 7900 XTX Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Desktop
Radeon RX 7900 XT Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Desktop
Radeon RX 7900 GRE Desktop
Radeon RX 6950 XT Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Desktop
Radeon RX 7800 XT Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Desktop
NVIDIA RTX A6000 Desktop
Radeon RX 6900 XT Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB Desktop
RTX 6000 Ada Generation Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Desktop
Radeon Pro W6800 Desktop
Radeon RX 6800 XT Desktop
Radeon RX 6800 Desktop
Radeon RX 7700 XT Desktop
NVIDIA Titan RTX Desktop
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Desktop
Radeon RX 6750 XT Desktop
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon RX 6700 XT Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Desktop
Arc A770 Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Desktop
Radeon RX 7600 Desktop
GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon RX 6650 XT Desktop
Radeon RX 6600 XT Desktop
GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop) Desktop

Classe 2

Arc A750 Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Desktop
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Desktop
Titan X Pascal Desktop
GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon VII Desktop
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) Desktop
Arc A580 Desktop
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon RX 6600 Desktop
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop) Desktop
RX Vega 64 Desktop
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) Desktop
RX Vega 56 Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Desktop
GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop) Desktop
Pro Vega 56 Desktop
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) Desktop
RTX A2000 Desktop
Radeon RX 6500 XT Desktop
Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce GTX 980 Ti Desktop
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon R9 Fury Desktop
Radeon R9 Nano Desktop
GeForce GTX 980 Desktop
Radeon RX 590 Desktop
Radeon RX 580 Desktop
Radeon R9 390X Desktop
GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon RX 570 Desktop
Radeon RX 480 Desktop
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) Desktop
Arc A380 Desktop
GeForce GTX 970 Desktop
Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) Desktop

Classe 3

T1000 Desktop
Radeon R9 380 Desktop
GeForce GTX 960 Desktop
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon R7 370 Desktop
GeForce GTX 950 Desktop
T600 Desktop
Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce GT 710 Desktop
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
FirePro W4100 Desktop
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
FirePro W2100 Desktop

Classe 4

VideoCore VII *

Posizione approssimativa dell'adattatore grafico

> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Info Techniche / Tips > Confronto delle schede video > NVIDIA > NVIDIA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Klaus Hinum, 2022-08-16 (Update: 2022-08-16)