Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 847

L'Intel Celeron 847 è un processore dual core Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) per portatili di fascia bassa. Si basa sull'architettura Sandy Bridge ma molte features come il Turbo Boost sono disattivate. Il Celeron 847 integra una scheda grafica chiamata Intel HD Graphics che si basa sulla HD Graphics 2000.

Le prestazioni del Celeron 847 dovrebbero essere superiori rispetto ad una CPU Arrandale Pentium con clock simile e di conseguenza al livello di una Pentium U5400 da 1.2 GHz.

Il TDP da 17W include la GPU integrata ed il controller di memoria e di conseguenza la 847 è adatta per piccoli subnotebooks.

SerieIntel Celeron
Nome in codiceSandy Bridge

Serie: Celeron Sandy Bridge

Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 847 « 1.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Clock Rate1100 MHz
Level 1 Cache128 KB
Level 2 Cache512 KB
Level 3 Cache2 MB
Numero di Cores / Threads2 / 2
Consumo energetico (TDP = Thermal Design Power)17 Watt
Tecnologia del produttore32 nm
Temperatura massima100 °C
SocketBGA1023
FeaturesHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
GPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 800 MHz)
64 BitSupporto 64 Bit
Architecturex86
Data di annuncio06/19/2011
Collegamento Prodotto (esterno)ark.intel.com

Benchmark

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.57     media: 0.6     media: 0.6 (1%)     massimo: 0.72 Points
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.39     media: 0.4     media: 0.4 (10%)     massimo: 0.42 Points
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1094     media: 1269.5     media: 1269.5 (8%)     massimo: 1445 punti
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2026     media: 2407.5     media: 2407.5 (2%)     massimo: 2789 punti
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 2865     media: 3159     media: 3159 (2%)     massimo: 3453 Points
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 1564     media: 1678.5     media: 1678.5 (2%)     massimo: 1793 Points
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 2716     media: 2716     media: 2716 (216%)     massimo: 1260.3 s
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 80.4     media: 80.4     media: 80.4 (236%)     massimo: 34 s
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
824 punti (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0 GB/s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.1 GB/s (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 826     media: 992.5     media: 992.5 (2%)     massimo: 1159 Points
+ 2 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 35.5     media: 35.5     media: 35.5 (176%)     massimo: 20.2 s
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 78.3     media: 78.3     media: 78.3 (209%)     massimo: 37.5 s
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1780     media: 1780     media: 1780 (204%)     massimo: 873.522 s
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3149 Points (32%)
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2541 Points (25%)
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
1742 Points (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
1663 Points (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
2014 Points (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 552     media: 552     media: 552 (409%)     massimo: 134.8 ms
+ 1 benchmarks e specifiche   + Mostra il grafico di confronto
- Valori di benchmark per questa scheda grafica
- Valori medi di benchmark per questa scheda grafica
* Numeri più piccoli rappresentano prestazioni supeiori

v1.28
Errors [Close]

#0 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 2716>1260.3 for benchmark 50, setting:204 +0s ... 0.098s

#1 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 80.4>34 for benchmark 50, setting:203 +0s ... 0.108s

#2 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 35.5>20.2 for benchmark 6, setting:2242 +0s ... 0.167s

#3 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 78.3>37.5 for benchmark 7, setting:2243 +0s ... 0.177s

#4 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1780>873.522 for benchmark 8, setting:2244 +0s ... 0.186s

#5 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 15000> for benchmark 10, setting:2277 +0s ... 0.196s

#6 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 7310> for benchmark 11, setting:2278 +0s ... 0.202s

#7 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 552>134.8 for benchmark 124, setting:649 +0s ... 0.241s

log 10. 05:29:01

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:28:38 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.004s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.004s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.004s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.005s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.005s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.005s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.005s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.006s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.006s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.006s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.006s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.007s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.007s

#18 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#19 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#20 getting avg benchmarks for device 2730 +0.002s ... 0.009s

#21 got single benchmarks 2730 +0.018s ... 0.028s

#22 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.03s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.012s ... 0.042s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.012s ... 0.054s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.012s ... 0.066s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.011s ... 0.077s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.011s ... 0.088s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.01s ... 0.098s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.01s ... 0.108s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.011s ... 0.119s

#32 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.01s ... 0.129s

#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.01s ... 0.139s

#34 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.01s ... 0.149s

#35 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.009s ... 0.157s

#36 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.01s ... 0.167s

#37 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.009s ... 0.177s

#38 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.009s ... 0.186s

#39 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.01s ... 0.196s

#40 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.202s

#41 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.208s

#42 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.215s

#43 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.221s

#44 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.227s

#45 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.234s

#46 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.008s ... 0.241s

#47 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.249s

#48 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.249s

#49 return log +0s ... 0.249s

Recensioni per il Intel Celeron 847 processore

 

Recensione breve del portatile HP Pavilion 14-c010us Chromebook

Basilare. Con l'avvento dei Chromebooks abbiamo un assortimento di macchine che somigliano a netbook spesso accusati di essere poco potenti e troppo piccoli. Co...
Intel Celeron 847 | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics | 14.00" | 1.7 kg

Samsung ATIV 270E4V-K01HS: Intel HD Graphics 2000, 14.00", 2 kg
  Recensioni esterne » Samsung ATIV 270E4V-K01HS

HP Pavilion 14-c002sa: Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), 14.00", 1.8 kg
  Recensioni esterne » HP Pavilion 14-c002sa

HP Pavilion 14-c002ea: Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), 14.00", 1.8 kg
  Recensioni esterne » HP Pavilion 14-c002ea

Acer C710-2457: Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), 11.60", 1.4 kg
  Recensioni esterne » Acer C710-2457

HP Pavilion 14-c001ef: Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), 14.00", 1.8 kg
  Recensioni esterne » HP Pavilion 14-c001ef

Gigabyte Slate S1082: Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), 10.10", 0.8 kg
  Recensioni esterne » Gigabyte Slate S1082

Asus VivoBook X202E-CT103H: Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), 11.60", 1.4 kg
  Recensioni esterne » Asus VivoBook X202E-CT103H

Asus 1015E: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics, 10.10", 1.3 kg
  Recensioni esterne » Asus 1015E

Acer C710-2055: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  Recensioni esterne » Acer C710-2055

HP Pavilion 14-c010us: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  Recensioni esterne » HP Pavilion 14-c010us

Asus VivoBook S200e-CT210h: Intel HD Graphics 2000, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  Recensioni esterne » Asus VivoBook S200e-CT210h

Asus Eee PC F201E-KX064H: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics, 11.60", 1.3 kg
  Recensioni esterne » Asus Eee PC F201E-KX064H

Asus X201E-KX004DU: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics, 11.60", 1.3 kg
  Recensioni esterne » Asus X201E-KX004DU

Asus Eee PC F201E-KX066DU: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics, 11.60", 1.3 kg
  Recensioni esterne » Asus Eee PC F201E-KX066DU

Acer C710-2847: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics, 11.60", 1.3 kg
  Recensioni esterne » Acer C710-2847

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Confronto CPU Mobile
Confronto di tutte le serie di CPU mobile

» Processori Mobile - Elenco Benchmark
Elenco Benchmark di tutte le CPUs conosciute, usate nei portatili (CPUs desktop e portatili)

Altre CPU della serie Celeron

» Intel Celeron 2970M
   2x 2.2 GHz
» Intel Celeron 4205U
   2x 1.8 GHz
» Intel Celeron 1020E
   2x 2.2 GHz
» Intel Celeron 3765U
   2x 1.9 GHz
» Intel Celeron 2950M
   2x 2 GHz
» Intel Celeron 1020M
   2x 2.1 GHz
» Intel Celeron 3755U
   2x 1.7 GHz
» Intel Celeron 3215U
   2x 1.7 GHz
» Intel Celeron 1005M
   2x 1.9 GHz
» Intel Celeron 1000M
   2x 1.8 GHz
» Intel Celeron 1037U
   2x 1.8 GHz
» Intel Celeron 2981U
   2x 1.6 GHz
» Intel Celeron 2980U
   2x 1.6 GHz
» Intel Celeron B840
   2x 1.9 GHz
» Intel Celeron J3455
   4x 1.5 GHz - 2.3 GHz
» Intel Celeron N3450
   4x 1.1 GHz - 2.2 GHz
» Intel Celeron B830
   2x 1.8 GHz
» Intel Celeron 1017U
   2x 1.6 GHz
» Intel Celeron 3205U
   2x 1.5 GHz
» Intel Celeron B820
   2x 1.7 GHz
» Intel Celeron J1900
   4x 2 GHz - 2.42 GHz
» Intel Celeron N2940
   4x 1.83 GHz - 2.25 GHz
» Intel Celeron N3160
   4x 1.6 GHz - 2.24 GHz
» Intel Celeron 2957U
   2x 1.4 GHz
» Intel Celeron 2955U
   2x 1.4 GHz
» Intel Celeron J3355
   2x 2 GHz - 2.5 GHz
» Intel Celeron N3350
   2x 1.1 GHz - 2.4 GHz
» Intel Celeron 1007U
   2x 1.5 GHz
» Intel Celeron N3150
   4x 1.6 GHz - 2.08 GHz
» Intel Celeron N2930
   4x 1.83 GHz - 2.16 GHz
» Intel Celeron J1850
   4x 2 GHz
» Intel Celeron B815
   2x 1.6 GHz
» Intel Celeron B810
   2x 1.6 GHz
» Intel Celeron N2920
   4x 1.86 GHz - 2 GHz
» Intel Celeron 1047UE
   2x 1.4 GHz
» Intel Celeron 887
   2x 1.5 GHz
» Intel Celeron B800
   2x 1.5 GHz
» Intel Celeron J1800
   2x 2.41 GHz - 2.58 GHz
» Intel Celeron N2840
   2x 2.16 GHz - 2.58 GHz
» Intel Celeron J1750
   2x 2.41 GHz
» Intel Celeron N3060
   2x 1.6 GHz - 2.48 GHz
» Intel Celeron N2910
   4x 1.6 GHz
» Intel Celeron N2830
   2x 2.16 GHz - 2.41 GHz
» Intel Celeron N2820
   2x 2.17 GHz - 2.39 GHz
» Intel Celeron N3050
   2x 1.6 GHz - 2.16 GHz
» Intel Celeron N2815
   2x 1.86 GHz - 2.13 GHz
» Intel Celeron N3000
   2x 1.04 GHz - 2.08 GHz
» Intel Celeron N2810
   2x 2 GHz
» Intel Celeron 2961Y
   2x 1.1 GHz
» Intel Celeron 877
   2x 1.4 GHz
» Intel Celeron 867
   2x 1.3 GHz
» Intel Celeron B730
   1x 1.8 GHz
» Intel Celeron 1019Y
   2x 1 GHz
» Intel Celeron 847
   2x 1.1 GHz
» Intel Celeron 807
   1x 1.5 GHz
» Intel Celeron B720
   1x 1.7 GHz
» Intel Celeron N2808
   2x 1.58 GHz - 2.25 GHz
» Intel Celeron 927UE
   1x 1.5 GHz
» Intel Celeron N2807
   2x 1.58 GHz - 2.16 GHz
» Intel Celeron N2806
   2x 1.58 GHz - 2 GHz
» Intel Celeron B710
   1x 1.6 GHz
» Intel Celeron 797
   1x 1.4 GHz
» Intel Celeron N2805
   2x 1.46 GHz

CPUs simili

+ AMD E1-2500
   2x 1.4 GHz
+ AMD E1 Micro-6200T
   2x 1 GHz - 1.4 GHz
+ AMD E1-6010
   2x 1.35 GHz
+ AMD Mobile Sempron X2 NI-52
   2x 1.8 GHz
+ AMD Athlon Neo X2 L335
   2x 1.6 GHz
» Intel Celeron 847
   2x 1.1 GHz
- Intel Celeron M 925
   1x 2.3 GHz
- Intel Celeron 807
   1x 1.5 GHz
- AMD V-Series V160
   1x 2.4 GHz
- AMD Athlon II Neo K345
   2x 1.4 GHz
- Intel Celeron B720
   1x 1.7 GHz
> Recensioni e prove di notebook, tablets e smartphones > Info Techniche / Tips > Processori per portatili > Intel Celeron 847 Notebook Processor
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2014-09-19)