Crosscall Stellar-X5
Specifiche tecniche
Fotocamera Secondaria: 16 MPix
Price comparison
recensioni per Crosscall Stellar-X5
Sorgente: DxOMark
EN→ITThe Crosscall Stellar-X5 showed an average overall battery performance with good autonomy, and decent efficiency, but a poor charging experience. When used moderately, the Stellar-X5 managed to last more than two and a half days, which is above average in our database. The Stellar-X5 performed well during our typical usage scenario, but it struggled during our tests when settings such as screen brightness were calibrated. The Stellar-X5’s charging experience was quite slow, with the 20W charger never delivering above 18W. Using a wired charger, the device took more than 3 hours to reach a full charge. A quick 5-minute battery top-up recovered on average a bit more than 2 hours and 30 minutes of autonomy.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 09/17/2024
Sorgente: DxOMark
EN→ITThe Crosscall Stellar-X5 is the French brand’s entry into the Ultra-premium realm, with a sleeker look and feel as well as better camera specifications than prior models in an aim to bridge the gap between the rugged work phone and the personal phone. The higher-resolution sensor and a better chipset than the previously tested Action-X5 indeed resulted in significant improvements in all aspects of our image quality evaluation. The Stellar-X5’s camera score also improved considerably thanks to images that were consistently well exposed and that showed an extended dynamic range. In addition, the camera has an efficient zero shutter lag capability in most tested conditions, meaning the user is likely to capture the intended moment, particularly fast-action scenarios like sports.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 06/11/2024
Sorgente: DxOMark
EN→ITThe Crosscall Stellar-X5’s screen provided a very uneven performance in our Display protocol, with a screen experience that was affected by a pinkish cast in all conditions. Although the Stellar-X5’s display luminance and contrast levels were able to match most ultra-premium phones in indoor conditions, the device’s display was still difficult to read, especially in bright outdoor environments. In complete darkness, the screen’s luminance remained much too bright to offer a comfortable viewing experience. Watching HDR10 video was also a mixed experience. Although there were no frame drops, it was sometimes hard to make out the dark tones in the video content due to the lack of brightness.
Singola recensione, disponibile online, Lungo, Data: 06/04/2024
Commenti
Qualcomm Adreno 710:
La maggior parte dei giochi attuali può essere giocata in modo fluido. Ma preparatevi ad una riduzione delle presentazioni grafiche considerando le impostazioni di dettaglio basse e la risoluzione limitata. Tuttavia, queste schede forniscono ancora abbastanza potenza per le applicazioni da ufficio e la proiezioni di video (ma non per i video HD).
>> Ulteriori informazioni le potete trovare nel nostroConfronto delle schede grafiche e nella nostra Lista dei Benchmark.
SD 6 Gen 1: SoC di fascia media con 8 core Kryo (4x ARM Cortex A78 con cluster di prestazioni a 2,2 GHz, 4x ARM Cortex A55 con cluster di efficienza a 1,8) e un modem X62 5G (fino a 2900 Mbps in download). Il chip è prodotto con il moderno processo a 4 nm.
>>Ulteriori informazioni le potete trovare nel nostroConfronto dei processori per portatili.
6.58":
Solo pochi smartphones hanno schermi più grandi.
I display con dimensioni maggiori consentono risoluzioni più elevate. Quindi, i dettagli come le lettere sono più grandi. D'altro canto, il consumo energetico è inferiore negli schermi con diagonali piccole e su dispositivi più piccoli, più leggeri ed economici.
>> Per scoprire come è la risoluzione del vostro schermo, andate a vedere la nostraLista DPI.
>> Ulteriori informazioni le potete trovare nella nostra Guida all'acquisto di un portatile.
